SCENARIO «QUARREL» IN THE ASPECT OF CONFLICT DISCOURSE

• Main Author: С. В. Форманова
• Format: Article
• Language: Bulgarian
• Published: Odessa I. I. Mechnykov National University 2017-06-01
• Series: Записки з українського мовознавства
• Subjects: конфлікт; конфліктний дискурс; сценарій; сварка; інвектива; комунікативна інтеракція; прагматична настанова
• Online Access: http://zum.onu.edu.ua/article/view/131416

The article is devoted to analysis of communicative-pragmatic argument as in modern scientific interpretations and the results of the actual material. Posted different definitions of the term in linguistics; the option to quarrel and pragmatic attitude; conflict analysis scenarios ‘quarrel’, resulting discourse of conflict and aggression; speech features described conflict interaction between communicants proposed typology scenarios ‘quarrel’. The article is to determine the characteristics of the ‘quarrel’ as a factor in conflict discourse. The objective involves solving the following tasks: 1) organize and summarize theoretical background studies conflict discourse; 2) determine the characteristics of ‘argument’; 3) analyze conflict scenarios ‘quarrel’; 4) describe the speech features of conflict interaction between communicants. The object of analysis is in conflict scenarios quarrels discourse. The subject of the research is conflicting discourse. For any conflict, including interpersonal, verbal form is characterized by aggression that is manifested in the form of charges, image, reproaches, lies undertaken to discredit  opponents and implemented in the script ‘quarrel’. The quarrel is a natural phenomenon in many countries, even with high ethnic culture. The quarrel caused by several reasons, the main of which is insulting, fighting, swearing - all that discredits opponent humiliates his honor and dignity. The quarrel destroy the opponent, puts him out of emotional balance. Typically, a quarrel provokes the opponent to perform certain actions aimed at the destruction of linguistic identity and behavior contrary to etiquette; has a negative impact on the interlocutor, designs contempt for the enemy manipulates them. The primary means of argument is invective, which demonstrates a negative attitude to the recipient, despises him as a person contributes to the psychological, moral, emotional and communicative discomfort.