Evaluation of cavitated and non-cavitated carious lesions using the WHO basic methods, ICDAS-II and laser fluorescence measurements

Aim: This study was aimed to compare the diagnostic outcome of the WHO criteria, ICDAS-II criteria and laser fluorescence measurements in measuring the caries ratings of children. Settings and Design: Cross-sectional study. Materials and Methods: The study involved 31 children between 3 and 14 years...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mridula Goswami, Anju Singh Rajwar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2015-01-01
Series:Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jisppd.com/article.asp?issn=0970-4388;year=2015;volume=33;issue=1;spage=10;epage=14;aulast=Goswami
id doaj-7b7046df84bc48ec9cba952ff71f22fb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7b7046df84bc48ec9cba952ff71f22fb2020-11-24T23:36:43ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry0970-43881998-39052015-01-01331101410.4103/0970-4388.148961Evaluation of cavitated and non-cavitated carious lesions using the WHO basic methods, ICDAS-II and laser fluorescence measurementsMridula GoswamiAnju Singh RajwarAim: This study was aimed to compare the diagnostic outcome of the WHO criteria, ICDAS-II criteria and laser fluorescence measurements in measuring the caries ratings of children. Settings and Design: Cross-sectional study. Materials and Methods: The study involved 31 children between 3 and 14 years of age, attending the Department of Pedodontics at Maulana Azad College of Dental Sciences, New Delhi. The surface-related caries status was registered according to the WHO basic method criteria (1997). Additionally, the ICDAS-II visual criteria and the DIAGNOdent readings were documented. Statistical analysis used: The data were analysed with ezANOVA and Excel 2000 (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA). Results: The mean ICDAS-II values amounted to 8.76 ± 0.72. The mean values for DMFS/def were 7.67 ± 0.91, whereas for DIAGNOdent it amounted to 4.00 ± 0.62. Conclusions: In conclusion, this study showed the diagnostic potential of the ICDAS-II criteria in comparison to the traditional WHO criteria by means of the non-cavitated caries lesions additionally detected. The DIAGNOdent use in field studies that already apply detailed visual criteria seems to bring limited additional information.http://www.jisppd.com/article.asp?issn=0970-4388;year=2015;volume=33;issue=1;spage=10;epage=14;aulast=GoswamiCaries detectiondental cariesDIAGNOdentearly diagnosisICDAS-II
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mridula Goswami
Anju Singh Rajwar
spellingShingle Mridula Goswami
Anju Singh Rajwar
Evaluation of cavitated and non-cavitated carious lesions using the WHO basic methods, ICDAS-II and laser fluorescence measurements
Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry
Caries detection
dental caries
DIAGNOdent
early diagnosis
ICDAS-II
author_facet Mridula Goswami
Anju Singh Rajwar
author_sort Mridula Goswami
title Evaluation of cavitated and non-cavitated carious lesions using the WHO basic methods, ICDAS-II and laser fluorescence measurements
title_short Evaluation of cavitated and non-cavitated carious lesions using the WHO basic methods, ICDAS-II and laser fluorescence measurements
title_full Evaluation of cavitated and non-cavitated carious lesions using the WHO basic methods, ICDAS-II and laser fluorescence measurements
title_fullStr Evaluation of cavitated and non-cavitated carious lesions using the WHO basic methods, ICDAS-II and laser fluorescence measurements
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of cavitated and non-cavitated carious lesions using the WHO basic methods, ICDAS-II and laser fluorescence measurements
title_sort evaluation of cavitated and non-cavitated carious lesions using the who basic methods, icdas-ii and laser fluorescence measurements
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry
issn 0970-4388
1998-3905
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Aim: This study was aimed to compare the diagnostic outcome of the WHO criteria, ICDAS-II criteria and laser fluorescence measurements in measuring the caries ratings of children. Settings and Design: Cross-sectional study. Materials and Methods: The study involved 31 children between 3 and 14 years of age, attending the Department of Pedodontics at Maulana Azad College of Dental Sciences, New Delhi. The surface-related caries status was registered according to the WHO basic method criteria (1997). Additionally, the ICDAS-II visual criteria and the DIAGNOdent readings were documented. Statistical analysis used: The data were analysed with ezANOVA and Excel 2000 (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA). Results: The mean ICDAS-II values amounted to 8.76 ± 0.72. The mean values for DMFS/def were 7.67 ± 0.91, whereas for DIAGNOdent it amounted to 4.00 ± 0.62. Conclusions: In conclusion, this study showed the diagnostic potential of the ICDAS-II criteria in comparison to the traditional WHO criteria by means of the non-cavitated caries lesions additionally detected. The DIAGNOdent use in field studies that already apply detailed visual criteria seems to bring limited additional information.
topic Caries detection
dental caries
DIAGNOdent
early diagnosis
ICDAS-II
url http://www.jisppd.com/article.asp?issn=0970-4388;year=2015;volume=33;issue=1;spage=10;epage=14;aulast=Goswami
work_keys_str_mv AT mridulagoswami evaluationofcavitatedandnoncavitatedcariouslesionsusingthewhobasicmethodsicdasiiandlaserfluorescencemeasurements
AT anjusinghrajwar evaluationofcavitatedandnoncavitatedcariouslesionsusingthewhobasicmethodsicdasiiandlaserfluorescencemeasurements
_version_ 1725521859153231872