Evaluation of cavitated and non-cavitated carious lesions using the WHO basic methods, ICDAS-II and laser fluorescence measurements
Aim: This study was aimed to compare the diagnostic outcome of the WHO criteria, ICDAS-II criteria and laser fluorescence measurements in measuring the caries ratings of children. Settings and Design: Cross-sectional study. Materials and Methods: The study involved 31 children between 3 and 14 years...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2015-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.jisppd.com/article.asp?issn=0970-4388;year=2015;volume=33;issue=1;spage=10;epage=14;aulast=Goswami |
id |
doaj-7b7046df84bc48ec9cba952ff71f22fb |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-7b7046df84bc48ec9cba952ff71f22fb2020-11-24T23:36:43ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry0970-43881998-39052015-01-01331101410.4103/0970-4388.148961Evaluation of cavitated and non-cavitated carious lesions using the WHO basic methods, ICDAS-II and laser fluorescence measurementsMridula GoswamiAnju Singh RajwarAim: This study was aimed to compare the diagnostic outcome of the WHO criteria, ICDAS-II criteria and laser fluorescence measurements in measuring the caries ratings of children. Settings and Design: Cross-sectional study. Materials and Methods: The study involved 31 children between 3 and 14 years of age, attending the Department of Pedodontics at Maulana Azad College of Dental Sciences, New Delhi. The surface-related caries status was registered according to the WHO basic method criteria (1997). Additionally, the ICDAS-II visual criteria and the DIAGNOdent readings were documented. Statistical analysis used: The data were analysed with ezANOVA and Excel 2000 (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA). Results: The mean ICDAS-II values amounted to 8.76 ± 0.72. The mean values for DMFS/def were 7.67 ± 0.91, whereas for DIAGNOdent it amounted to 4.00 ± 0.62. Conclusions: In conclusion, this study showed the diagnostic potential of the ICDAS-II criteria in comparison to the traditional WHO criteria by means of the non-cavitated caries lesions additionally detected. The DIAGNOdent use in field studies that already apply detailed visual criteria seems to bring limited additional information.http://www.jisppd.com/article.asp?issn=0970-4388;year=2015;volume=33;issue=1;spage=10;epage=14;aulast=GoswamiCaries detectiondental cariesDIAGNOdentearly diagnosisICDAS-II |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Mridula Goswami Anju Singh Rajwar |
spellingShingle |
Mridula Goswami Anju Singh Rajwar Evaluation of cavitated and non-cavitated carious lesions using the WHO basic methods, ICDAS-II and laser fluorescence measurements Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry Caries detection dental caries DIAGNOdent early diagnosis ICDAS-II |
author_facet |
Mridula Goswami Anju Singh Rajwar |
author_sort |
Mridula Goswami |
title |
Evaluation of cavitated and non-cavitated carious lesions using the WHO basic methods, ICDAS-II and laser fluorescence measurements |
title_short |
Evaluation of cavitated and non-cavitated carious lesions using the WHO basic methods, ICDAS-II and laser fluorescence measurements |
title_full |
Evaluation of cavitated and non-cavitated carious lesions using the WHO basic methods, ICDAS-II and laser fluorescence measurements |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of cavitated and non-cavitated carious lesions using the WHO basic methods, ICDAS-II and laser fluorescence measurements |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of cavitated and non-cavitated carious lesions using the WHO basic methods, ICDAS-II and laser fluorescence measurements |
title_sort |
evaluation of cavitated and non-cavitated carious lesions using the who basic methods, icdas-ii and laser fluorescence measurements |
publisher |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
series |
Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry |
issn |
0970-4388 1998-3905 |
publishDate |
2015-01-01 |
description |
Aim: This study was aimed to compare the diagnostic outcome of the WHO criteria, ICDAS-II criteria and laser fluorescence measurements in measuring the caries ratings of children. Settings and Design: Cross-sectional study. Materials and Methods: The study involved 31 children between 3 and 14 years of age, attending the Department of Pedodontics at Maulana Azad College of Dental Sciences, New Delhi. The surface-related caries status was registered according to the WHO basic method criteria (1997). Additionally, the ICDAS-II visual criteria and the DIAGNOdent readings were documented. Statistical analysis used: The data were analysed with ezANOVA and Excel 2000 (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA). Results: The mean ICDAS-II values amounted to 8.76 ± 0.72. The mean values for DMFS/def were 7.67 ± 0.91, whereas for DIAGNOdent it amounted to 4.00 ± 0.62. Conclusions: In conclusion, this study showed the diagnostic potential of the ICDAS-II criteria in comparison to the traditional WHO criteria by means of the non-cavitated caries lesions additionally detected. The DIAGNOdent use in field studies that already apply detailed visual criteria seems to bring limited additional information. |
topic |
Caries detection dental caries DIAGNOdent early diagnosis ICDAS-II |
url |
http://www.jisppd.com/article.asp?issn=0970-4388;year=2015;volume=33;issue=1;spage=10;epage=14;aulast=Goswami |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mridulagoswami evaluationofcavitatedandnoncavitatedcariouslesionsusingthewhobasicmethodsicdasiiandlaserfluorescencemeasurements AT anjusinghrajwar evaluationofcavitatedandnoncavitatedcariouslesionsusingthewhobasicmethodsicdasiiandlaserfluorescencemeasurements |
_version_ |
1725521859153231872 |