Comparison of adverse events between video and direct laryngoscopes for tracheal intubations in emergency department and ICU patients–a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract Objective This systematic review and meta-analysis was designed to determine whether video laryngoscope (VL) compared with direct laryngoscope (DL) could reduce the occurrence of adverse events associated with tracheal intubation in the emergency and ICU patients. Methods The current issue...
Main Authors: | Jia Jiang, Na Kang, Bo Li, An-Shi Wu, Fu-Shan Xue |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2020-02-01
|
Series: | Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-020-0702-7 |
Similar Items
-
Macintosh laryngoscope and i-view™ and C-MAC® video laryngoscopes for tracheal intubation with an aerosol box: a randomized crossover manikin study
by: Toshiyuki Nakanishi, et al.
Published: (2021-06-01) -
GlideScope Video Laryngoscope for Difficult Intubation in Emergency Patients: a Quasi-Randomized Controlled Trial
by: Koorosh Ahmadi, et al.
Published: (2015-12-01) -
Video laryngoscopy does not improve the intubation outcomes in emergency and critical patients – a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
by: Jia Jiang, et al.
Published: (2017-11-01) -
GlideScope® cobalt video laryngoscope versus direct Miller laryngoscope for lateral position-tracheal intubation in neonates with myelodysplasia: A prospective randomized study
by: Eman Ramadan Salama, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01) -
C-MAC Video Laryngoscope versus Conventional Direct Laryngoscopy for Endotracheal Intubation During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
by: Byeong Chul Min, et al.
Published: (2019-05-01)