Subthreshold 577 nm micropulse laser treatment for central serous chorioretinopathy.

To compare the efficacy of the subthreshold micropulse laser (SML) to conventional laser (CL) in treating focal leakages of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) in the eyes with central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC).Twenty-nine eyes of 28 patients with CSC and typical focal leakage were treated wit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ichiro Maruko, Hideki Koizumi, Taiji Hasegawa, Hisaya Arakawa, Tomohiro Iida
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2017-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5574536?pdf=render
id doaj-7b8f13256d0847e7985665826505d382
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7b8f13256d0847e7985665826505d3822020-11-25T02:47:49ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-01128e018411210.1371/journal.pone.0184112Subthreshold 577 nm micropulse laser treatment for central serous chorioretinopathy.Ichiro MarukoHideki KoizumiTaiji HasegawaHisaya ArakawaTomohiro IidaTo compare the efficacy of the subthreshold micropulse laser (SML) to conventional laser (CL) in treating focal leakages of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) in the eyes with central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC).Twenty-nine eyes of 28 patients with CSC and typical focal leakage were treated with CL or SML. Both treatments were made with a 577 nm yellow laser (CL: NIDEK MC-500, SML: IRIDEX IQ577). The percentage of eyes with a complete resolution, the distance of the laser burns from the fovea, and injury of the RPE after treatment were studied.A complete resolution was seen in 10 of 15 eyes (66.7%) after CL and 9 of 14 eyes (64.3%) after SML (P = 0.89). The average distance from the foveal center to the leakage point was 1282±596 μm for eyes treated with CL and 1271±993 μm for eyes treated with SML (P = 0.4). Only three eyes treated with SML had treatment sites within 500 μm of the fovea. RPE damage determined by fundus autofluorescence was found in all eyes treated with CL and only one eye treated with SML (P<.01).SML achieved equivalent therapeutic effects as CL but without RPE damage in eyes with CSC.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5574536?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ichiro Maruko
Hideki Koizumi
Taiji Hasegawa
Hisaya Arakawa
Tomohiro Iida
spellingShingle Ichiro Maruko
Hideki Koizumi
Taiji Hasegawa
Hisaya Arakawa
Tomohiro Iida
Subthreshold 577 nm micropulse laser treatment for central serous chorioretinopathy.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Ichiro Maruko
Hideki Koizumi
Taiji Hasegawa
Hisaya Arakawa
Tomohiro Iida
author_sort Ichiro Maruko
title Subthreshold 577 nm micropulse laser treatment for central serous chorioretinopathy.
title_short Subthreshold 577 nm micropulse laser treatment for central serous chorioretinopathy.
title_full Subthreshold 577 nm micropulse laser treatment for central serous chorioretinopathy.
title_fullStr Subthreshold 577 nm micropulse laser treatment for central serous chorioretinopathy.
title_full_unstemmed Subthreshold 577 nm micropulse laser treatment for central serous chorioretinopathy.
title_sort subthreshold 577 nm micropulse laser treatment for central serous chorioretinopathy.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2017-01-01
description To compare the efficacy of the subthreshold micropulse laser (SML) to conventional laser (CL) in treating focal leakages of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) in the eyes with central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC).Twenty-nine eyes of 28 patients with CSC and typical focal leakage were treated with CL or SML. Both treatments were made with a 577 nm yellow laser (CL: NIDEK MC-500, SML: IRIDEX IQ577). The percentage of eyes with a complete resolution, the distance of the laser burns from the fovea, and injury of the RPE after treatment were studied.A complete resolution was seen in 10 of 15 eyes (66.7%) after CL and 9 of 14 eyes (64.3%) after SML (P = 0.89). The average distance from the foveal center to the leakage point was 1282±596 μm for eyes treated with CL and 1271±993 μm for eyes treated with SML (P = 0.4). Only three eyes treated with SML had treatment sites within 500 μm of the fovea. RPE damage determined by fundus autofluorescence was found in all eyes treated with CL and only one eye treated with SML (P<.01).SML achieved equivalent therapeutic effects as CL but without RPE damage in eyes with CSC.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5574536?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT ichiromaruko subthreshold577nmmicropulselasertreatmentforcentralserouschorioretinopathy
AT hidekikoizumi subthreshold577nmmicropulselasertreatmentforcentralserouschorioretinopathy
AT taijihasegawa subthreshold577nmmicropulselasertreatmentforcentralserouschorioretinopathy
AT hisayaarakawa subthreshold577nmmicropulselasertreatmentforcentralserouschorioretinopathy
AT tomohiroiida subthreshold577nmmicropulselasertreatmentforcentralserouschorioretinopathy
_version_ 1724751085501939712