The critical detection distance for passively tracking tagged fish using a fixed radio telemetry station in a small stream

Abstract Background Fixed radio telemetry stations are used to study the movement ecology of fishes in streams and rivers. A common assumption of such studies is that detection efficiency remains constant through space and time. The objective of this study was to understand how site characteristics...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Brittany G. Sullivan, Daniel P. Struthers, Mark K. Taylor, Chris Carli, Steven J. Cooke
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-12-01
Series:Animal Biotelemetry
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40317-019-0187-1
id doaj-7bbd96d13c2c4797b3eb18cba028ec73
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7bbd96d13c2c4797b3eb18cba028ec732020-12-27T12:06:22ZengBMCAnimal Biotelemetry2050-33852019-12-01711710.1186/s40317-019-0187-1The critical detection distance for passively tracking tagged fish using a fixed radio telemetry station in a small streamBrittany G. Sullivan0Daniel P. Struthers1Mark K. Taylor2Chris Carli3Steven J. Cooke4Fish Ecology and Conservation Physiology Laboratory, Department of Biology and Institute of Environmental and Interdisciplinary Science, Carleton UniversityParks Canada Agency, Banff National ParkParks Canada Agency, Banff National ParkDepartment of Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Stock AssessmentFish Ecology and Conservation Physiology Laboratory, Department of Biology and Institute of Environmental and Interdisciplinary Science, Carleton UniversityAbstract Background Fixed radio telemetry stations are used to study the movement ecology of fishes in streams and rivers. A common assumption of such studies is that detection efficiency remains constant through space and time. The objective of this study was to understand how site characteristics and tag distance can influence the detection efficiency of a fixed receiver when used for fisheries research in a small stream. Field tests included a fixed receiver station on Forty Mile Creek, in Banff National Park, AB, Canada that recorded signals from radio tags over specified distances (i.e., 0 m, 27 m, 53 m, 80 m) within the expected detection range from July to October, 2016. Model selection was used to test which parameters may influence detection efficiency. Results The fixed receiver was able to record an average of 89% of transmissions over the study period. Detection efficiency was greater or equal to 0.97 at tag distances of ≤ 53 m. Detection efficiency significantly declined by 36% to a rate of 0.62 for tags placed 80 m from the fixed receiver. Water temperature and water depth also reduced detection efficiency, but only at the critical threshold of 80 m from the tag. Interestingly, turbidity had no influence on detection efficiency in this study. Conclusions This study provided insights into the reliability of fixed receiver stations as a passive tracking technique in small streams. The abrupt change in detection efficiency observed in this study presumably occurs in other systems. Identifying critical detection distance thresholds would appear to be a useful strategy for avoiding false-negative results. It is recommended that researchers who conduct radio tracking studies with fixed arrays should consider the deployment of sentinel tags over the study to understand the system performance.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40317-019-0187-1Tag validationRange testingTransmitterRadio telemetrySentinel tagFish
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Brittany G. Sullivan
Daniel P. Struthers
Mark K. Taylor
Chris Carli
Steven J. Cooke
spellingShingle Brittany G. Sullivan
Daniel P. Struthers
Mark K. Taylor
Chris Carli
Steven J. Cooke
The critical detection distance for passively tracking tagged fish using a fixed radio telemetry station in a small stream
Animal Biotelemetry
Tag validation
Range testing
Transmitter
Radio telemetry
Sentinel tag
Fish
author_facet Brittany G. Sullivan
Daniel P. Struthers
Mark K. Taylor
Chris Carli
Steven J. Cooke
author_sort Brittany G. Sullivan
title The critical detection distance for passively tracking tagged fish using a fixed radio telemetry station in a small stream
title_short The critical detection distance for passively tracking tagged fish using a fixed radio telemetry station in a small stream
title_full The critical detection distance for passively tracking tagged fish using a fixed radio telemetry station in a small stream
title_fullStr The critical detection distance for passively tracking tagged fish using a fixed radio telemetry station in a small stream
title_full_unstemmed The critical detection distance for passively tracking tagged fish using a fixed radio telemetry station in a small stream
title_sort critical detection distance for passively tracking tagged fish using a fixed radio telemetry station in a small stream
publisher BMC
series Animal Biotelemetry
issn 2050-3385
publishDate 2019-12-01
description Abstract Background Fixed radio telemetry stations are used to study the movement ecology of fishes in streams and rivers. A common assumption of such studies is that detection efficiency remains constant through space and time. The objective of this study was to understand how site characteristics and tag distance can influence the detection efficiency of a fixed receiver when used for fisheries research in a small stream. Field tests included a fixed receiver station on Forty Mile Creek, in Banff National Park, AB, Canada that recorded signals from radio tags over specified distances (i.e., 0 m, 27 m, 53 m, 80 m) within the expected detection range from July to October, 2016. Model selection was used to test which parameters may influence detection efficiency. Results The fixed receiver was able to record an average of 89% of transmissions over the study period. Detection efficiency was greater or equal to 0.97 at tag distances of ≤ 53 m. Detection efficiency significantly declined by 36% to a rate of 0.62 for tags placed 80 m from the fixed receiver. Water temperature and water depth also reduced detection efficiency, but only at the critical threshold of 80 m from the tag. Interestingly, turbidity had no influence on detection efficiency in this study. Conclusions This study provided insights into the reliability of fixed receiver stations as a passive tracking technique in small streams. The abrupt change in detection efficiency observed in this study presumably occurs in other systems. Identifying critical detection distance thresholds would appear to be a useful strategy for avoiding false-negative results. It is recommended that researchers who conduct radio tracking studies with fixed arrays should consider the deployment of sentinel tags over the study to understand the system performance.
topic Tag validation
Range testing
Transmitter
Radio telemetry
Sentinel tag
Fish
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40317-019-0187-1
work_keys_str_mv AT brittanygsullivan thecriticaldetectiondistanceforpassivelytrackingtaggedfishusingafixedradiotelemetrystationinasmallstream
AT danielpstruthers thecriticaldetectiondistanceforpassivelytrackingtaggedfishusingafixedradiotelemetrystationinasmallstream
AT markktaylor thecriticaldetectiondistanceforpassivelytrackingtaggedfishusingafixedradiotelemetrystationinasmallstream
AT chriscarli thecriticaldetectiondistanceforpassivelytrackingtaggedfishusingafixedradiotelemetrystationinasmallstream
AT stevenjcooke thecriticaldetectiondistanceforpassivelytrackingtaggedfishusingafixedradiotelemetrystationinasmallstream
AT brittanygsullivan criticaldetectiondistanceforpassivelytrackingtaggedfishusingafixedradiotelemetrystationinasmallstream
AT danielpstruthers criticaldetectiondistanceforpassivelytrackingtaggedfishusingafixedradiotelemetrystationinasmallstream
AT markktaylor criticaldetectiondistanceforpassivelytrackingtaggedfishusingafixedradiotelemetrystationinasmallstream
AT chriscarli criticaldetectiondistanceforpassivelytrackingtaggedfishusingafixedradiotelemetrystationinasmallstream
AT stevenjcooke criticaldetectiondistanceforpassivelytrackingtaggedfishusingafixedradiotelemetrystationinasmallstream
_version_ 1724369402009223168