Combining the effects of undersized drilling and bone density on implant insertion torque

Aim: This study evaluated the influence of surgical undersized drilling on insertion torque of an implant system at low bone density. Methods: Implant site preparations were made in two polyurethane foam blocks with different densities, where two preparation techniques were considered: Control group...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bernardo Alievi Camargo, Daniel Becker Nunes, Aloísio Oro Spazzin, Leonardo Federizzi, Christian Schuh, Érica Alves Gomes
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Estadual de Campinas 2017-08-01
Series:Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8649981
id doaj-7bd12b3974584119a51efffb45e14de2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7bd12b3974584119a51efffb45e14de22021-07-15T13:59:12ZengUniversidade Estadual de CampinasBrazilian Journal of Oral Sciences1677-32252017-08-0115310.20396/bjos.v15i3.8649981Combining the effects of undersized drilling and bone density on implant insertion torqueBernardo Alievi Camargo0Daniel Becker Nunes1Aloísio Oro Spazzin2Leonardo Federizzi3Christian Schuh4Érica Alves Gomes5Universidade de Passo FundoCentro Universitário IngáCentro de Estudos Odontológicos MeridionalCentro de Estudos Odontológicos MeridionalCentro de Estudos Odontológicos MeridionalUniversidade de Ribeirão PretoAim: This study evaluated the influence of surgical undersized drilling on insertion torque of an implant system at low bone density. Methods: Implant site preparations were made in two polyurethane foam blocks with different densities, where two preparation techniques were considered: Control group (C): conventional drilling, following the manufacturer’s instructions; and Group (E): undersized drilling, experimental technique using a final surgical drill with reduced diameter. The artificial bone blocks were selected based on density: D1 (0.64 g/cm3) and D2 (0.32 g/cm3). Three groups were considered according to the preparation technique and bone density used (n=10): CD1 – conventional drilling technique in artificial bone with higher density; CD2 – conventional drilling technique in artificial bone with lower density; and ED2 – undersized drilling in artificial bone with lower density. Externalhexagon implants (11 × 4 mm) were inserted and the insertion torque values were measured using a digital torque-meter. Data were submitted to one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test (α=0.05). Results: The results showed significant statistical differences between groups (p<0.001), where the highest insertion torque was found for the Group CD1 (48.9 Ncm) followed by Group ED2 (22.6 Ncm) and Group CD2 (11.7 Ncm). Conclusions: The undersized drilling technique for implant site preparation leads to increased insertion torque on low bone density. https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8649981Dental implantation. Torque. Bone density. Drilling techniques.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bernardo Alievi Camargo
Daniel Becker Nunes
Aloísio Oro Spazzin
Leonardo Federizzi
Christian Schuh
Érica Alves Gomes
spellingShingle Bernardo Alievi Camargo
Daniel Becker Nunes
Aloísio Oro Spazzin
Leonardo Federizzi
Christian Schuh
Érica Alves Gomes
Combining the effects of undersized drilling and bone density on implant insertion torque
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
Dental implantation. Torque. Bone density. Drilling techniques.
author_facet Bernardo Alievi Camargo
Daniel Becker Nunes
Aloísio Oro Spazzin
Leonardo Federizzi
Christian Schuh
Érica Alves Gomes
author_sort Bernardo Alievi Camargo
title Combining the effects of undersized drilling and bone density on implant insertion torque
title_short Combining the effects of undersized drilling and bone density on implant insertion torque
title_full Combining the effects of undersized drilling and bone density on implant insertion torque
title_fullStr Combining the effects of undersized drilling and bone density on implant insertion torque
title_full_unstemmed Combining the effects of undersized drilling and bone density on implant insertion torque
title_sort combining the effects of undersized drilling and bone density on implant insertion torque
publisher Universidade Estadual de Campinas
series Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
issn 1677-3225
publishDate 2017-08-01
description Aim: This study evaluated the influence of surgical undersized drilling on insertion torque of an implant system at low bone density. Methods: Implant site preparations were made in two polyurethane foam blocks with different densities, where two preparation techniques were considered: Control group (C): conventional drilling, following the manufacturer’s instructions; and Group (E): undersized drilling, experimental technique using a final surgical drill with reduced diameter. The artificial bone blocks were selected based on density: D1 (0.64 g/cm3) and D2 (0.32 g/cm3). Three groups were considered according to the preparation technique and bone density used (n=10): CD1 – conventional drilling technique in artificial bone with higher density; CD2 – conventional drilling technique in artificial bone with lower density; and ED2 – undersized drilling in artificial bone with lower density. Externalhexagon implants (11 × 4 mm) were inserted and the insertion torque values were measured using a digital torque-meter. Data were submitted to one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test (α=0.05). Results: The results showed significant statistical differences between groups (p<0.001), where the highest insertion torque was found for the Group CD1 (48.9 Ncm) followed by Group ED2 (22.6 Ncm) and Group CD2 (11.7 Ncm). Conclusions: The undersized drilling technique for implant site preparation leads to increased insertion torque on low bone density.
topic Dental implantation. Torque. Bone density. Drilling techniques.
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8649981
work_keys_str_mv AT bernardoalievicamargo combiningtheeffectsofundersizeddrillingandbonedensityonimplantinsertiontorque
AT danielbeckernunes combiningtheeffectsofundersizeddrillingandbonedensityonimplantinsertiontorque
AT aloisioorospazzin combiningtheeffectsofundersizeddrillingandbonedensityonimplantinsertiontorque
AT leonardofederizzi combiningtheeffectsofundersizeddrillingandbonedensityonimplantinsertiontorque
AT christianschuh combiningtheeffectsofundersizeddrillingandbonedensityonimplantinsertiontorque
AT ericaalvesgomes combiningtheeffectsofundersizeddrillingandbonedensityonimplantinsertiontorque
_version_ 1721300574546165760