Combining the effects of undersized drilling and bone density on implant insertion torque
Aim: This study evaluated the influence of surgical undersized drilling on insertion torque of an implant system at low bone density. Methods: Implant site preparations were made in two polyurethane foam blocks with different densities, where two preparation techniques were considered: Control group...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas
2017-08-01
|
Series: | Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8649981 |
id |
doaj-7bd12b3974584119a51efffb45e14de2 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-7bd12b3974584119a51efffb45e14de22021-07-15T13:59:12ZengUniversidade Estadual de CampinasBrazilian Journal of Oral Sciences1677-32252017-08-0115310.20396/bjos.v15i3.8649981Combining the effects of undersized drilling and bone density on implant insertion torqueBernardo Alievi Camargo0Daniel Becker Nunes1Aloísio Oro Spazzin2Leonardo Federizzi3Christian Schuh4Érica Alves Gomes5Universidade de Passo FundoCentro Universitário IngáCentro de Estudos Odontológicos MeridionalCentro de Estudos Odontológicos MeridionalCentro de Estudos Odontológicos MeridionalUniversidade de Ribeirão PretoAim: This study evaluated the influence of surgical undersized drilling on insertion torque of an implant system at low bone density. Methods: Implant site preparations were made in two polyurethane foam blocks with different densities, where two preparation techniques were considered: Control group (C): conventional drilling, following the manufacturer’s instructions; and Group (E): undersized drilling, experimental technique using a final surgical drill with reduced diameter. The artificial bone blocks were selected based on density: D1 (0.64 g/cm3) and D2 (0.32 g/cm3). Three groups were considered according to the preparation technique and bone density used (n=10): CD1 – conventional drilling technique in artificial bone with higher density; CD2 – conventional drilling technique in artificial bone with lower density; and ED2 – undersized drilling in artificial bone with lower density. Externalhexagon implants (11 × 4 mm) were inserted and the insertion torque values were measured using a digital torque-meter. Data were submitted to one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test (α=0.05). Results: The results showed significant statistical differences between groups (p<0.001), where the highest insertion torque was found for the Group CD1 (48.9 Ncm) followed by Group ED2 (22.6 Ncm) and Group CD2 (11.7 Ncm). Conclusions: The undersized drilling technique for implant site preparation leads to increased insertion torque on low bone density. https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8649981Dental implantation. Torque. Bone density. Drilling techniques. |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Bernardo Alievi Camargo Daniel Becker Nunes Aloísio Oro Spazzin Leonardo Federizzi Christian Schuh Érica Alves Gomes |
spellingShingle |
Bernardo Alievi Camargo Daniel Becker Nunes Aloísio Oro Spazzin Leonardo Federizzi Christian Schuh Érica Alves Gomes Combining the effects of undersized drilling and bone density on implant insertion torque Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences Dental implantation. Torque. Bone density. Drilling techniques. |
author_facet |
Bernardo Alievi Camargo Daniel Becker Nunes Aloísio Oro Spazzin Leonardo Federizzi Christian Schuh Érica Alves Gomes |
author_sort |
Bernardo Alievi Camargo |
title |
Combining the effects of undersized drilling and bone density on implant insertion torque |
title_short |
Combining the effects of undersized drilling and bone density on implant insertion torque |
title_full |
Combining the effects of undersized drilling and bone density on implant insertion torque |
title_fullStr |
Combining the effects of undersized drilling and bone density on implant insertion torque |
title_full_unstemmed |
Combining the effects of undersized drilling and bone density on implant insertion torque |
title_sort |
combining the effects of undersized drilling and bone density on implant insertion torque |
publisher |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
series |
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences |
issn |
1677-3225 |
publishDate |
2017-08-01 |
description |
Aim: This study evaluated the influence of surgical undersized drilling on insertion torque of an implant system at low bone density. Methods: Implant site preparations were made in two polyurethane foam blocks with different densities, where two preparation techniques were considered: Control group (C): conventional drilling, following the manufacturer’s instructions; and Group (E): undersized drilling, experimental technique using a final surgical drill with reduced diameter. The artificial bone blocks were selected based on density: D1 (0.64 g/cm3) and D2 (0.32 g/cm3). Three groups were considered according to the preparation technique and bone density used (n=10): CD1 – conventional drilling technique in artificial bone with higher density; CD2 – conventional drilling technique in artificial bone with lower density; and ED2 – undersized drilling in artificial bone with lower density. Externalhexagon implants (11 × 4 mm) were inserted and the insertion torque values were measured using a digital torque-meter. Data were submitted to one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test (α=0.05). Results: The results showed significant statistical differences between groups (p<0.001), where the highest insertion torque was found for the Group CD1 (48.9 Ncm) followed by Group ED2 (22.6 Ncm) and Group CD2 (11.7 Ncm). Conclusions: The undersized drilling technique for implant site preparation leads to increased insertion torque on low bone density.
|
topic |
Dental implantation. Torque. Bone density. Drilling techniques. |
url |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8649981 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT bernardoalievicamargo combiningtheeffectsofundersizeddrillingandbonedensityonimplantinsertiontorque AT danielbeckernunes combiningtheeffectsofundersizeddrillingandbonedensityonimplantinsertiontorque AT aloisioorospazzin combiningtheeffectsofundersizeddrillingandbonedensityonimplantinsertiontorque AT leonardofederizzi combiningtheeffectsofundersizeddrillingandbonedensityonimplantinsertiontorque AT christianschuh combiningtheeffectsofundersizeddrillingandbonedensityonimplantinsertiontorque AT ericaalvesgomes combiningtheeffectsofundersizeddrillingandbonedensityonimplantinsertiontorque |
_version_ |
1721300574546165760 |