Lingual microbiota profiles of patients with geographic tongue

Geographic tongue (GT) is an oral mucosal lesion that affects the tongue. The association between GT and the bacterial colonization profiles of the tongue is not clear. Lingual swabs were collected from lesion sites and healthy sites of 35 patients with GT (19 males and 16 females; Mage = 54.3 ± 16....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amal Dafar, Maria Bankvall, Hülya Çevik-Aras, Mats Jontell, Fei Sjöberg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2017-01-01
Series:Journal of Oral Microbiology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20002297.2017.1355206
id doaj-7bd8030029344298aa94f689db9e00f9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7bd8030029344298aa94f689db9e00f92020-11-24T22:58:48ZengTaylor & Francis GroupJournal of Oral Microbiology2000-22972017-01-019110.1080/20002297.2017.13552061355206Lingual microbiota profiles of patients with geographic tongueAmal Dafar0Maria Bankvall1Hülya Çevik-Aras2Mats Jontell3Fei Sjöberg4Institute of OdontologyInstitute of OdontologyInstitute of OdontologyInstitute of OdontologyInstitute of Clinical Sciences; The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of GothenburgGeographic tongue (GT) is an oral mucosal lesion that affects the tongue. The association between GT and the bacterial colonization profiles of the tongue is not clear. Lingual swabs were collected from lesion sites and healthy sites of 35 patients with GT (19 males and 16 females; Mage = 54.3 ± 16.1 years) and 22 controls (12 males and 10 females; Mage = 56.3 ± 15.8 years). Bacterial DNA was extracted and sequenced by next-generation sequencing. At the phylum level, Fusobacteria were significantly less abundant, while Spirochaetes were significantly more abundant in GT patients compared to controls. At the operational taxonomic units level, multivariate analysis revealed distinct clusters for the three groups based on the lingual microbiota composition. Acinetobacter and Delftia were significantly associated with GT lesion and healthy sites. However, Microbacterium, Leptospira, Methylotenera, and Lactococcus were significantly associated with GT lesion sites. Additionally, Mogibacterium and Simonsiella were significantly associated with GT healthy sites and controls. The changes in the lingual microbiota profiles of patients with GT imply a shift in the lingual bacterial ecology. However, it remains unknown if this shift is a consequence of the lesions or of factors associated with the initiation and progression of the disease.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20002297.2017.1355206Benign migratory glossitistongue lesionsoral mucosal lesionsoral diseasesnext-generation sequencing
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Amal Dafar
Maria Bankvall
Hülya Çevik-Aras
Mats Jontell
Fei Sjöberg
spellingShingle Amal Dafar
Maria Bankvall
Hülya Çevik-Aras
Mats Jontell
Fei Sjöberg
Lingual microbiota profiles of patients with geographic tongue
Journal of Oral Microbiology
Benign migratory glossitis
tongue lesions
oral mucosal lesions
oral diseases
next-generation sequencing
author_facet Amal Dafar
Maria Bankvall
Hülya Çevik-Aras
Mats Jontell
Fei Sjöberg
author_sort Amal Dafar
title Lingual microbiota profiles of patients with geographic tongue
title_short Lingual microbiota profiles of patients with geographic tongue
title_full Lingual microbiota profiles of patients with geographic tongue
title_fullStr Lingual microbiota profiles of patients with geographic tongue
title_full_unstemmed Lingual microbiota profiles of patients with geographic tongue
title_sort lingual microbiota profiles of patients with geographic tongue
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Journal of Oral Microbiology
issn 2000-2297
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Geographic tongue (GT) is an oral mucosal lesion that affects the tongue. The association between GT and the bacterial colonization profiles of the tongue is not clear. Lingual swabs were collected from lesion sites and healthy sites of 35 patients with GT (19 males and 16 females; Mage = 54.3 ± 16.1 years) and 22 controls (12 males and 10 females; Mage = 56.3 ± 15.8 years). Bacterial DNA was extracted and sequenced by next-generation sequencing. At the phylum level, Fusobacteria were significantly less abundant, while Spirochaetes were significantly more abundant in GT patients compared to controls. At the operational taxonomic units level, multivariate analysis revealed distinct clusters for the three groups based on the lingual microbiota composition. Acinetobacter and Delftia were significantly associated with GT lesion and healthy sites. However, Microbacterium, Leptospira, Methylotenera, and Lactococcus were significantly associated with GT lesion sites. Additionally, Mogibacterium and Simonsiella were significantly associated with GT healthy sites and controls. The changes in the lingual microbiota profiles of patients with GT imply a shift in the lingual bacterial ecology. However, it remains unknown if this shift is a consequence of the lesions or of factors associated with the initiation and progression of the disease.
topic Benign migratory glossitis
tongue lesions
oral mucosal lesions
oral diseases
next-generation sequencing
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20002297.2017.1355206
work_keys_str_mv AT amaldafar lingualmicrobiotaprofilesofpatientswithgeographictongue
AT mariabankvall lingualmicrobiotaprofilesofpatientswithgeographictongue
AT hulyacevikaras lingualmicrobiotaprofilesofpatientswithgeographictongue
AT matsjontell lingualmicrobiotaprofilesofpatientswithgeographictongue
AT feisjoberg lingualmicrobiotaprofilesofpatientswithgeographictongue
_version_ 1725646429850959872