Comparisons between context-specific and beverage-specific quantity frequency instruments to assess alcohol consumption indices: Individual and sample level analysis.

There are many survey instruments to determine drinking patterns and alcohol consumption levels in the general population. This study aims to compare the context-specific quantity-frequency (CSQF) and beverage-specific quantity-frequency (BSQF) methods to estimate alcohol consumption indices at indi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Polathep Vichitkunakorn, Karnsunaphat Balthip, Alan Geater, Sawitri Assanangkornchai
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6097696?pdf=render
id doaj-7c006dd563f94637988388342d14ce91
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7c006dd563f94637988388342d14ce912020-11-24T21:40:46ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-01138e020275610.1371/journal.pone.0202756Comparisons between context-specific and beverage-specific quantity frequency instruments to assess alcohol consumption indices: Individual and sample level analysis.Polathep VichitkunakornKarnsunaphat BalthipAlan GeaterSawitri AssanangkornchaiThere are many survey instruments to determine drinking patterns and alcohol consumption levels in the general population. This study aims to compare the context-specific quantity-frequency (CSQF) and beverage-specific quantity-frequency (BSQF) methods to estimate alcohol consumption indices at individual and sample levels. A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted among a population aged 15 years and older in Songkhla Province, Thailand. The BSQF and CSQF questionnaires with a 3-month retrospective time frame and in random order were applied to each participant. The CSQF was developed to ask more about the drinking contexts. The questions elicited information on location, partner, beverage, quantity, and frequency for five common drinking situations. Among 804 participants, 183 drank alcohol in the last three months. At the individual level, total alcohol consumption of almost all types of beverage by the CSQF was higher than the BSQF in approximately 50% of current drinkers and was mainly accounted for by the higher report of average quantity. At the sample level, there were no significant differences in the average daily intake, 3-month intake per drinker or per capita consumption between instruments. The interview duration and burden of answering the questions by the participants for the CSQF were not significantly higher than those for the BSQF. In summary, the fuller picture of drinking behaviors from the CSQF has several valuable methodological advantages and provides information allowing alcohol policies to be more directly specific to certain target populations or situations. The CSQF is a prototype questionnaire and forms the basis for a contextual approach. However, additional methodological studies need to be explored.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6097696?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Polathep Vichitkunakorn
Karnsunaphat Balthip
Alan Geater
Sawitri Assanangkornchai
spellingShingle Polathep Vichitkunakorn
Karnsunaphat Balthip
Alan Geater
Sawitri Assanangkornchai
Comparisons between context-specific and beverage-specific quantity frequency instruments to assess alcohol consumption indices: Individual and sample level analysis.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Polathep Vichitkunakorn
Karnsunaphat Balthip
Alan Geater
Sawitri Assanangkornchai
author_sort Polathep Vichitkunakorn
title Comparisons between context-specific and beverage-specific quantity frequency instruments to assess alcohol consumption indices: Individual and sample level analysis.
title_short Comparisons between context-specific and beverage-specific quantity frequency instruments to assess alcohol consumption indices: Individual and sample level analysis.
title_full Comparisons between context-specific and beverage-specific quantity frequency instruments to assess alcohol consumption indices: Individual and sample level analysis.
title_fullStr Comparisons between context-specific and beverage-specific quantity frequency instruments to assess alcohol consumption indices: Individual and sample level analysis.
title_full_unstemmed Comparisons between context-specific and beverage-specific quantity frequency instruments to assess alcohol consumption indices: Individual and sample level analysis.
title_sort comparisons between context-specific and beverage-specific quantity frequency instruments to assess alcohol consumption indices: individual and sample level analysis.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2018-01-01
description There are many survey instruments to determine drinking patterns and alcohol consumption levels in the general population. This study aims to compare the context-specific quantity-frequency (CSQF) and beverage-specific quantity-frequency (BSQF) methods to estimate alcohol consumption indices at individual and sample levels. A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted among a population aged 15 years and older in Songkhla Province, Thailand. The BSQF and CSQF questionnaires with a 3-month retrospective time frame and in random order were applied to each participant. The CSQF was developed to ask more about the drinking contexts. The questions elicited information on location, partner, beverage, quantity, and frequency for five common drinking situations. Among 804 participants, 183 drank alcohol in the last three months. At the individual level, total alcohol consumption of almost all types of beverage by the CSQF was higher than the BSQF in approximately 50% of current drinkers and was mainly accounted for by the higher report of average quantity. At the sample level, there were no significant differences in the average daily intake, 3-month intake per drinker or per capita consumption between instruments. The interview duration and burden of answering the questions by the participants for the CSQF were not significantly higher than those for the BSQF. In summary, the fuller picture of drinking behaviors from the CSQF has several valuable methodological advantages and provides information allowing alcohol policies to be more directly specific to certain target populations or situations. The CSQF is a prototype questionnaire and forms the basis for a contextual approach. However, additional methodological studies need to be explored.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6097696?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT polathepvichitkunakorn comparisonsbetweencontextspecificandbeveragespecificquantityfrequencyinstrumentstoassessalcoholconsumptionindicesindividualandsamplelevelanalysis
AT karnsunaphatbalthip comparisonsbetweencontextspecificandbeveragespecificquantityfrequencyinstrumentstoassessalcoholconsumptionindicesindividualandsamplelevelanalysis
AT alangeater comparisonsbetweencontextspecificandbeveragespecificquantityfrequencyinstrumentstoassessalcoholconsumptionindicesindividualandsamplelevelanalysis
AT sawitriassanangkornchai comparisonsbetweencontextspecificandbeveragespecificquantityfrequencyinstrumentstoassessalcoholconsumptionindicesindividualandsamplelevelanalysis
_version_ 1725924658404917248