Negotiating Stories in the Anthropocene. The Case of Nathaniel Rich&rsquo;s <i>Losing Earth</i>

It is almost a trope in contemporary discussions on the Anthropocene to call for new narratives that are able to convey the scale of the ecological crisis. When does a narrative become new, however? In this article, I build on Luc Herman and Bart Vervaeck’s theory of narrative in culture to develop...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Marco Caracciolo
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Bergische Universität Wuppertal 2020-12-01
Series:Diegesis: Interdisziplinäres E-Journal für Erzählforschung
Online Access:https://www.diegesis.uni-wuppertal.de/index.php/diegesis/article/view/394
id doaj-7c18426289f74a77a76be5d958d6a88e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7c18426289f74a77a76be5d958d6a88e2020-12-26T16:40:49ZdeuBergische Universität WuppertalDiegesis: Interdisziplinäres E-Journal für Erzählforschung2195-21162020-12-0192411Negotiating Stories in the Anthropocene. The Case of Nathaniel Rich&rsquo;s <i>Losing Earth</i>Marco CaraccioloIt is almost a trope in contemporary discussions on the Anthropocene to call for new narratives that are able to convey the scale of the ecological crisis. When does a narrative become new, however? In this article, I build on Luc Herman and Bart Vervaeck’s theory of narrative in culture to develop a preliminary answer to that question. I first explore the field of Anthropocene discourse and chart the ways in which stories about the ecological crisis can depart from traditional narrative templates. Novelty, from that perspective, is a function of the complexity of narrative’s engagement with existing stories, genres, and motifs. To exemplify this approach, I focus on Nathaniel Rich’s nonfiction book <em>Losing Earth</em> (2019), which reconstructs the early days of the climate change debate in the 1980s. In my reading, Rich’s work fails to do justice to the complexity of the Anthropocene because it falls back on a conventional narrative structure – the tragic plot – and it makes use of an actantial structure that neatly separates heroes and villains. By discussing the shortcomings of Rich’s account, I emphasize the centrality of narrative form in negotiating the Anthropocene in both fiction and nonfictional discourse.https://www.diegesis.uni-wuppertal.de/index.php/diegesis/article/view/394
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marco Caracciolo
spellingShingle Marco Caracciolo
Negotiating Stories in the Anthropocene. The Case of Nathaniel Rich&rsquo;s <i>Losing Earth</i>
Diegesis: Interdisziplinäres E-Journal für Erzählforschung
author_facet Marco Caracciolo
author_sort Marco Caracciolo
title Negotiating Stories in the Anthropocene. The Case of Nathaniel Rich&rsquo;s <i>Losing Earth</i>
title_short Negotiating Stories in the Anthropocene. The Case of Nathaniel Rich&rsquo;s <i>Losing Earth</i>
title_full Negotiating Stories in the Anthropocene. The Case of Nathaniel Rich&rsquo;s <i>Losing Earth</i>
title_fullStr Negotiating Stories in the Anthropocene. The Case of Nathaniel Rich&rsquo;s <i>Losing Earth</i>
title_full_unstemmed Negotiating Stories in the Anthropocene. The Case of Nathaniel Rich&rsquo;s <i>Losing Earth</i>
title_sort negotiating stories in the anthropocene. the case of nathaniel rich&rsquo;s <i>losing earth</i>
publisher Bergische Universität Wuppertal
series Diegesis: Interdisziplinäres E-Journal für Erzählforschung
issn 2195-2116
publishDate 2020-12-01
description It is almost a trope in contemporary discussions on the Anthropocene to call for new narratives that are able to convey the scale of the ecological crisis. When does a narrative become new, however? In this article, I build on Luc Herman and Bart Vervaeck’s theory of narrative in culture to develop a preliminary answer to that question. I first explore the field of Anthropocene discourse and chart the ways in which stories about the ecological crisis can depart from traditional narrative templates. Novelty, from that perspective, is a function of the complexity of narrative’s engagement with existing stories, genres, and motifs. To exemplify this approach, I focus on Nathaniel Rich’s nonfiction book <em>Losing Earth</em> (2019), which reconstructs the early days of the climate change debate in the 1980s. In my reading, Rich’s work fails to do justice to the complexity of the Anthropocene because it falls back on a conventional narrative structure – the tragic plot – and it makes use of an actantial structure that neatly separates heroes and villains. By discussing the shortcomings of Rich’s account, I emphasize the centrality of narrative form in negotiating the Anthropocene in both fiction and nonfictional discourse.
url https://www.diegesis.uni-wuppertal.de/index.php/diegesis/article/view/394
work_keys_str_mv AT marcocaracciolo negotiatingstoriesintheanthropocenethecaseofnathanielrichrsquosilosingearthi
_version_ 1724370493542236160