Criteria in consultant selection: public procurement of architectural and engineering services

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;"><span lang="EN-GB"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">The competence, commitment and attitudes of design consultants strongly influence the quality and costs of bui...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Josefin Sporrong
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: UTS ePRESS 2011-12-01
Series:Australasian Journal of Construction Economics and Building
Subjects:
Online Access:https://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/journals/index.php/AJCEB/article/view/2297
Description
Summary:<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;"><span lang="EN-GB"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">The competence, commitment and attitudes of design consultants strongly influence the quality and costs of built facilities. However, in the selection of professional services it is often difficult to specify and assess non-price criteria related to both firms and individual consultants. Therefore, clients traditionally rely on long term relations or recommendations from clients or colleagues. Public procurement regulation, however, restricts the use of such informal data. This study seeks to understand how procurers act to reconcile these conflicting demands.</span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"><span lang="EN-GB">An explorative questionnaire survey distributed to Swedish municipalities investigates which selection criteria and information sources are used, as well as perceived difficulties and shortcomings related to consultancy procurement. Results show a high focus on price or more easily measured non-price criteria. This might limit the ability of municipal officials to evaluate consultant competence, especially aspects related to design and execution of projects. Furthermore, personal information sources are widely used, indicating a <span style="mso-bidi-font-style: italic;">conflict between procurement practice and existing regulation. Unexpectedly, procurement officials were generally satisfied with their procurement practice. </span></span><span style="mso-fareast-language: SV;" lang="EN-GB">However, managers and more experienced procurers tend to be more satisfied than other officials. Satisfaction also appears to be connected to the existence of a procurement policy and more advanced selection methods.</span></span></span></p><p class="MsoNoSpacing" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt;"><span lang="EN-GB"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">&nbsp;</span></span></p><em style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;"><span style="font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; font-size: 11pt; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA;" lang="EN-GB">Keywords: </span></em><span style="font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; font-size: 11pt; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA;" lang="EN-GB">public procurement, selection, consultants, Sweden</span>
ISSN:1835-6354
1837-9133