Comparison of the Humphrey Field Analyzer and Photopic Negative Response of Focal Macular Electroretinograms in the Evaluation of the Relationship Between Macula Structure and Function

Purpose: To investigate the association between macular inner retinal layer thickness and macula visual field (VF) mean deviation as measured by the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) or macular function as measured by focal macular electroretinograms (ERGs) in patients with glaucoma.Methods: The partici...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kazuyuki Hirooka, Kenji Yokoyama, Kana Tokumo, Yoshiaki Kiuchi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2021.649971/full
id doaj-7c5d66115c28457bafd1944897949c67
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7c5d66115c28457bafd1944897949c672021-02-26T07:12:28ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Medicine2296-858X2021-02-01810.3389/fmed.2021.649971649971Comparison of the Humphrey Field Analyzer and Photopic Negative Response of Focal Macular Electroretinograms in the Evaluation of the Relationship Between Macula Structure and FunctionKazuyuki HirookaKenji YokoyamaKana TokumoYoshiaki KiuchiPurpose: To investigate the association between macular inner retinal layer thickness and macula visual field (VF) mean deviation as measured by the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) or macular function as measured by focal macular electroretinograms (ERGs) in patients with glaucoma.Methods: The participants in this cross-sectional study were 71 patients with glaucoma and 10 healthy controls. Macular inner retinal layer thickness and function were measured in all participants using optical coherence tomography (OCT) and HFA or focal macular ERGs, respectively. Macular OCT images were segmented into the macular retinal nerve fiber layer (mRNFL), macular ganglion cell layer/inner plexiform layer (GCL/IPL), and ganglion cell complex (GCC). Spearman correlation analysis was used to assess the relationship between macular inner retinal layer thickness and function.Results: Focal macular ERGs were composed of a negative wave (N1), a positive wave (P1), and a slow negative wave (N2). The N2 response density was significantly reduced in eyes with glaucoma, and was significantly associated with the thickness of the mRNFL (R = 0.317), GCL/IPL (R = 0.372), or GCC (R = 0.367). The observed structure–function relationship was also significantly correlated with the HFA VF mean deviation for each thickness [mRNFL (R = 0.728), GCL/IPL (R = 0.603), or GCC (R = 0.754)].Conclusions: Although a significant correlation was found between the N2 response density and the thickness of the macular inner layer, the observed structure–function relationship with the mean deviation of the HFA VF was higher than that of the N2 response density.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2021.649971/fullvisual fieldoptical coherance tomographyelectroretinogram (ERG)glaucomastructure-function
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kazuyuki Hirooka
Kenji Yokoyama
Kana Tokumo
Yoshiaki Kiuchi
spellingShingle Kazuyuki Hirooka
Kenji Yokoyama
Kana Tokumo
Yoshiaki Kiuchi
Comparison of the Humphrey Field Analyzer and Photopic Negative Response of Focal Macular Electroretinograms in the Evaluation of the Relationship Between Macula Structure and Function
Frontiers in Medicine
visual field
optical coherance tomography
electroretinogram (ERG)
glaucoma
structure-function
author_facet Kazuyuki Hirooka
Kenji Yokoyama
Kana Tokumo
Yoshiaki Kiuchi
author_sort Kazuyuki Hirooka
title Comparison of the Humphrey Field Analyzer and Photopic Negative Response of Focal Macular Electroretinograms in the Evaluation of the Relationship Between Macula Structure and Function
title_short Comparison of the Humphrey Field Analyzer and Photopic Negative Response of Focal Macular Electroretinograms in the Evaluation of the Relationship Between Macula Structure and Function
title_full Comparison of the Humphrey Field Analyzer and Photopic Negative Response of Focal Macular Electroretinograms in the Evaluation of the Relationship Between Macula Structure and Function
title_fullStr Comparison of the Humphrey Field Analyzer and Photopic Negative Response of Focal Macular Electroretinograms in the Evaluation of the Relationship Between Macula Structure and Function
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Humphrey Field Analyzer and Photopic Negative Response of Focal Macular Electroretinograms in the Evaluation of the Relationship Between Macula Structure and Function
title_sort comparison of the humphrey field analyzer and photopic negative response of focal macular electroretinograms in the evaluation of the relationship between macula structure and function
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Medicine
issn 2296-858X
publishDate 2021-02-01
description Purpose: To investigate the association between macular inner retinal layer thickness and macula visual field (VF) mean deviation as measured by the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) or macular function as measured by focal macular electroretinograms (ERGs) in patients with glaucoma.Methods: The participants in this cross-sectional study were 71 patients with glaucoma and 10 healthy controls. Macular inner retinal layer thickness and function were measured in all participants using optical coherence tomography (OCT) and HFA or focal macular ERGs, respectively. Macular OCT images were segmented into the macular retinal nerve fiber layer (mRNFL), macular ganglion cell layer/inner plexiform layer (GCL/IPL), and ganglion cell complex (GCC). Spearman correlation analysis was used to assess the relationship between macular inner retinal layer thickness and function.Results: Focal macular ERGs were composed of a negative wave (N1), a positive wave (P1), and a slow negative wave (N2). The N2 response density was significantly reduced in eyes with glaucoma, and was significantly associated with the thickness of the mRNFL (R = 0.317), GCL/IPL (R = 0.372), or GCC (R = 0.367). The observed structure–function relationship was also significantly correlated with the HFA VF mean deviation for each thickness [mRNFL (R = 0.728), GCL/IPL (R = 0.603), or GCC (R = 0.754)].Conclusions: Although a significant correlation was found between the N2 response density and the thickness of the macular inner layer, the observed structure–function relationship with the mean deviation of the HFA VF was higher than that of the N2 response density.
topic visual field
optical coherance tomography
electroretinogram (ERG)
glaucoma
structure-function
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2021.649971/full
work_keys_str_mv AT kazuyukihirooka comparisonofthehumphreyfieldanalyzerandphotopicnegativeresponseoffocalmacularelectroretinogramsintheevaluationoftherelationshipbetweenmaculastructureandfunction
AT kenjiyokoyama comparisonofthehumphreyfieldanalyzerandphotopicnegativeresponseoffocalmacularelectroretinogramsintheevaluationoftherelationshipbetweenmaculastructureandfunction
AT kanatokumo comparisonofthehumphreyfieldanalyzerandphotopicnegativeresponseoffocalmacularelectroretinogramsintheevaluationoftherelationshipbetweenmaculastructureandfunction
AT yoshiakikiuchi comparisonofthehumphreyfieldanalyzerandphotopicnegativeresponseoffocalmacularelectroretinogramsintheevaluationoftherelationshipbetweenmaculastructureandfunction
_version_ 1724249826582855680