Patient Complications after Interscalene Block: A Retrospective Comparison of Liposomal Bupivacaine to Nonliposomal Bupivacaine

Background. The purpose of this study was to investigate if the addition of liposome bupivacaine (LB) to an interscalene block (ISB) had an effect on the number of patients with surgical- or block-related complications. Methods. This was a single-center retrospective chart view performed by identify...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jacob L. Hutchins, Jason Habeck, Zac Novaczyk, Richard Campbell, Christopher Creedon, Ellen Spartz, Michael Richter, Jeremy Wolter, Gaurav Suryawanshi, Alexander Kaizer, Aaron A. Berg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2020-01-01
Series:Anesthesiology Research and Practice
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6704303
id doaj-7cb05b50bb364253b56df5f4a7a828ec
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7cb05b50bb364253b56df5f4a7a828ec2020-11-25T02:28:15ZengHindawi LimitedAnesthesiology Research and Practice1687-69621687-69702020-01-01202010.1155/2020/67043036704303Patient Complications after Interscalene Block: A Retrospective Comparison of Liposomal Bupivacaine to Nonliposomal BupivacaineJacob L. Hutchins0Jason Habeck1Zac Novaczyk2Richard Campbell3Christopher Creedon4Ellen Spartz5Michael Richter6Jeremy Wolter7Gaurav Suryawanshi8Alexander Kaizer9Aaron A. Berg10Department of Anesthesiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USADepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USADepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USADepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USADepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USADepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USADepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USADepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USADepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USADepartment of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado-Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USADepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USABackground. The purpose of this study was to investigate if the addition of liposome bupivacaine (LB) to an interscalene block (ISB) had an effect on the number of patients with surgical- or block-related complications. Methods. This was a single-center retrospective chart view performed by identifying patients who received an ISB from January 1, 2014, through April 26, 2018, at the University of Minnesota. 1,518 patients were identified who received an ISB (LB = 784, nonliposomal bupivacaine = 734). Patients were divided into two groups those who did receive liposome bupivacaine in their ISB and those who did not receive liposome bupivacaine in their ISB. Medical records were individually reviewed for surgical procedure, block medications, complications related to the block or surgical procedure, phone calls to the healthcare system for issues related to opioids or pain within 3 and within 30 days, readmissions within 30 days, and emergency room visits for complications within 3 and 30 days. Results. There was no significant difference in the number of patients with surgical or anesthetic complications. Only phone calls for pain within 3 days were significantly different. The LB group had 3.2% of patients call compared to 5.6% in the nonliposomal bupivacaine group (aOR = 1.71 (95% CI: 1.04–2.87), p=0.036). We found no significant difference in any of the other secondary outcomes. Conclusions. The use of LB in an ISB demonstrated no significant difference compared to nonliposomal bupivacaine in numbers of complications, emergency room visits, and readmissions.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6704303
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jacob L. Hutchins
Jason Habeck
Zac Novaczyk
Richard Campbell
Christopher Creedon
Ellen Spartz
Michael Richter
Jeremy Wolter
Gaurav Suryawanshi
Alexander Kaizer
Aaron A. Berg
spellingShingle Jacob L. Hutchins
Jason Habeck
Zac Novaczyk
Richard Campbell
Christopher Creedon
Ellen Spartz
Michael Richter
Jeremy Wolter
Gaurav Suryawanshi
Alexander Kaizer
Aaron A. Berg
Patient Complications after Interscalene Block: A Retrospective Comparison of Liposomal Bupivacaine to Nonliposomal Bupivacaine
Anesthesiology Research and Practice
author_facet Jacob L. Hutchins
Jason Habeck
Zac Novaczyk
Richard Campbell
Christopher Creedon
Ellen Spartz
Michael Richter
Jeremy Wolter
Gaurav Suryawanshi
Alexander Kaizer
Aaron A. Berg
author_sort Jacob L. Hutchins
title Patient Complications after Interscalene Block: A Retrospective Comparison of Liposomal Bupivacaine to Nonliposomal Bupivacaine
title_short Patient Complications after Interscalene Block: A Retrospective Comparison of Liposomal Bupivacaine to Nonliposomal Bupivacaine
title_full Patient Complications after Interscalene Block: A Retrospective Comparison of Liposomal Bupivacaine to Nonliposomal Bupivacaine
title_fullStr Patient Complications after Interscalene Block: A Retrospective Comparison of Liposomal Bupivacaine to Nonliposomal Bupivacaine
title_full_unstemmed Patient Complications after Interscalene Block: A Retrospective Comparison of Liposomal Bupivacaine to Nonliposomal Bupivacaine
title_sort patient complications after interscalene block: a retrospective comparison of liposomal bupivacaine to nonliposomal bupivacaine
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Anesthesiology Research and Practice
issn 1687-6962
1687-6970
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Background. The purpose of this study was to investigate if the addition of liposome bupivacaine (LB) to an interscalene block (ISB) had an effect on the number of patients with surgical- or block-related complications. Methods. This was a single-center retrospective chart view performed by identifying patients who received an ISB from January 1, 2014, through April 26, 2018, at the University of Minnesota. 1,518 patients were identified who received an ISB (LB = 784, nonliposomal bupivacaine = 734). Patients were divided into two groups those who did receive liposome bupivacaine in their ISB and those who did not receive liposome bupivacaine in their ISB. Medical records were individually reviewed for surgical procedure, block medications, complications related to the block or surgical procedure, phone calls to the healthcare system for issues related to opioids or pain within 3 and within 30 days, readmissions within 30 days, and emergency room visits for complications within 3 and 30 days. Results. There was no significant difference in the number of patients with surgical or anesthetic complications. Only phone calls for pain within 3 days were significantly different. The LB group had 3.2% of patients call compared to 5.6% in the nonliposomal bupivacaine group (aOR = 1.71 (95% CI: 1.04–2.87), p=0.036). We found no significant difference in any of the other secondary outcomes. Conclusions. The use of LB in an ISB demonstrated no significant difference compared to nonliposomal bupivacaine in numbers of complications, emergency room visits, and readmissions.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6704303
work_keys_str_mv AT jacoblhutchins patientcomplicationsafterinterscaleneblockaretrospectivecomparisonofliposomalbupivacainetononliposomalbupivacaine
AT jasonhabeck patientcomplicationsafterinterscaleneblockaretrospectivecomparisonofliposomalbupivacainetononliposomalbupivacaine
AT zacnovaczyk patientcomplicationsafterinterscaleneblockaretrospectivecomparisonofliposomalbupivacainetononliposomalbupivacaine
AT richardcampbell patientcomplicationsafterinterscaleneblockaretrospectivecomparisonofliposomalbupivacainetononliposomalbupivacaine
AT christophercreedon patientcomplicationsafterinterscaleneblockaretrospectivecomparisonofliposomalbupivacainetononliposomalbupivacaine
AT ellenspartz patientcomplicationsafterinterscaleneblockaretrospectivecomparisonofliposomalbupivacainetononliposomalbupivacaine
AT michaelrichter patientcomplicationsafterinterscaleneblockaretrospectivecomparisonofliposomalbupivacainetononliposomalbupivacaine
AT jeremywolter patientcomplicationsafterinterscaleneblockaretrospectivecomparisonofliposomalbupivacainetononliposomalbupivacaine
AT gauravsuryawanshi patientcomplicationsafterinterscaleneblockaretrospectivecomparisonofliposomalbupivacainetononliposomalbupivacaine
AT alexanderkaizer patientcomplicationsafterinterscaleneblockaretrospectivecomparisonofliposomalbupivacainetononliposomalbupivacaine
AT aaronaberg patientcomplicationsafterinterscaleneblockaretrospectivecomparisonofliposomalbupivacainetononliposomalbupivacaine
_version_ 1715477991071416320