Patient Complications after Interscalene Block: A Retrospective Comparison of Liposomal Bupivacaine to Nonliposomal Bupivacaine
Background. The purpose of this study was to investigate if the addition of liposome bupivacaine (LB) to an interscalene block (ISB) had an effect on the number of patients with surgical- or block-related complications. Methods. This was a single-center retrospective chart view performed by identify...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2020-01-01
|
Series: | Anesthesiology Research and Practice |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6704303 |
id |
doaj-7cb05b50bb364253b56df5f4a7a828ec |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-7cb05b50bb364253b56df5f4a7a828ec2020-11-25T02:28:15ZengHindawi LimitedAnesthesiology Research and Practice1687-69621687-69702020-01-01202010.1155/2020/67043036704303Patient Complications after Interscalene Block: A Retrospective Comparison of Liposomal Bupivacaine to Nonliposomal BupivacaineJacob L. Hutchins0Jason Habeck1Zac Novaczyk2Richard Campbell3Christopher Creedon4Ellen Spartz5Michael Richter6Jeremy Wolter7Gaurav Suryawanshi8Alexander Kaizer9Aaron A. Berg10Department of Anesthesiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USADepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USADepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USADepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USADepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USADepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USADepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USADepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USADepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USADepartment of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado-Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USADepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USABackground. The purpose of this study was to investigate if the addition of liposome bupivacaine (LB) to an interscalene block (ISB) had an effect on the number of patients with surgical- or block-related complications. Methods. This was a single-center retrospective chart view performed by identifying patients who received an ISB from January 1, 2014, through April 26, 2018, at the University of Minnesota. 1,518 patients were identified who received an ISB (LB = 784, nonliposomal bupivacaine = 734). Patients were divided into two groups those who did receive liposome bupivacaine in their ISB and those who did not receive liposome bupivacaine in their ISB. Medical records were individually reviewed for surgical procedure, block medications, complications related to the block or surgical procedure, phone calls to the healthcare system for issues related to opioids or pain within 3 and within 30 days, readmissions within 30 days, and emergency room visits for complications within 3 and 30 days. Results. There was no significant difference in the number of patients with surgical or anesthetic complications. Only phone calls for pain within 3 days were significantly different. The LB group had 3.2% of patients call compared to 5.6% in the nonliposomal bupivacaine group (aOR = 1.71 (95% CI: 1.04–2.87), p=0.036). We found no significant difference in any of the other secondary outcomes. Conclusions. The use of LB in an ISB demonstrated no significant difference compared to nonliposomal bupivacaine in numbers of complications, emergency room visits, and readmissions.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6704303 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jacob L. Hutchins Jason Habeck Zac Novaczyk Richard Campbell Christopher Creedon Ellen Spartz Michael Richter Jeremy Wolter Gaurav Suryawanshi Alexander Kaizer Aaron A. Berg |
spellingShingle |
Jacob L. Hutchins Jason Habeck Zac Novaczyk Richard Campbell Christopher Creedon Ellen Spartz Michael Richter Jeremy Wolter Gaurav Suryawanshi Alexander Kaizer Aaron A. Berg Patient Complications after Interscalene Block: A Retrospective Comparison of Liposomal Bupivacaine to Nonliposomal Bupivacaine Anesthesiology Research and Practice |
author_facet |
Jacob L. Hutchins Jason Habeck Zac Novaczyk Richard Campbell Christopher Creedon Ellen Spartz Michael Richter Jeremy Wolter Gaurav Suryawanshi Alexander Kaizer Aaron A. Berg |
author_sort |
Jacob L. Hutchins |
title |
Patient Complications after Interscalene Block: A Retrospective Comparison of Liposomal Bupivacaine to Nonliposomal Bupivacaine |
title_short |
Patient Complications after Interscalene Block: A Retrospective Comparison of Liposomal Bupivacaine to Nonliposomal Bupivacaine |
title_full |
Patient Complications after Interscalene Block: A Retrospective Comparison of Liposomal Bupivacaine to Nonliposomal Bupivacaine |
title_fullStr |
Patient Complications after Interscalene Block: A Retrospective Comparison of Liposomal Bupivacaine to Nonliposomal Bupivacaine |
title_full_unstemmed |
Patient Complications after Interscalene Block: A Retrospective Comparison of Liposomal Bupivacaine to Nonliposomal Bupivacaine |
title_sort |
patient complications after interscalene block: a retrospective comparison of liposomal bupivacaine to nonliposomal bupivacaine |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
Anesthesiology Research and Practice |
issn |
1687-6962 1687-6970 |
publishDate |
2020-01-01 |
description |
Background. The purpose of this study was to investigate if the addition of liposome bupivacaine (LB) to an interscalene block (ISB) had an effect on the number of patients with surgical- or block-related complications. Methods. This was a single-center retrospective chart view performed by identifying patients who received an ISB from January 1, 2014, through April 26, 2018, at the University of Minnesota. 1,518 patients were identified who received an ISB (LB = 784, nonliposomal bupivacaine = 734). Patients were divided into two groups those who did receive liposome bupivacaine in their ISB and those who did not receive liposome bupivacaine in their ISB. Medical records were individually reviewed for surgical procedure, block medications, complications related to the block or surgical procedure, phone calls to the healthcare system for issues related to opioids or pain within 3 and within 30 days, readmissions within 30 days, and emergency room visits for complications within 3 and 30 days. Results. There was no significant difference in the number of patients with surgical or anesthetic complications. Only phone calls for pain within 3 days were significantly different. The LB group had 3.2% of patients call compared to 5.6% in the nonliposomal bupivacaine group (aOR = 1.71 (95% CI: 1.04–2.87), p=0.036). We found no significant difference in any of the other secondary outcomes. Conclusions. The use of LB in an ISB demonstrated no significant difference compared to nonliposomal bupivacaine in numbers of complications, emergency room visits, and readmissions. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6704303 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jacoblhutchins patientcomplicationsafterinterscaleneblockaretrospectivecomparisonofliposomalbupivacainetononliposomalbupivacaine AT jasonhabeck patientcomplicationsafterinterscaleneblockaretrospectivecomparisonofliposomalbupivacainetononliposomalbupivacaine AT zacnovaczyk patientcomplicationsafterinterscaleneblockaretrospectivecomparisonofliposomalbupivacainetononliposomalbupivacaine AT richardcampbell patientcomplicationsafterinterscaleneblockaretrospectivecomparisonofliposomalbupivacainetononliposomalbupivacaine AT christophercreedon patientcomplicationsafterinterscaleneblockaretrospectivecomparisonofliposomalbupivacainetononliposomalbupivacaine AT ellenspartz patientcomplicationsafterinterscaleneblockaretrospectivecomparisonofliposomalbupivacainetononliposomalbupivacaine AT michaelrichter patientcomplicationsafterinterscaleneblockaretrospectivecomparisonofliposomalbupivacainetononliposomalbupivacaine AT jeremywolter patientcomplicationsafterinterscaleneblockaretrospectivecomparisonofliposomalbupivacainetononliposomalbupivacaine AT gauravsuryawanshi patientcomplicationsafterinterscaleneblockaretrospectivecomparisonofliposomalbupivacainetononliposomalbupivacaine AT alexanderkaizer patientcomplicationsafterinterscaleneblockaretrospectivecomparisonofliposomalbupivacainetononliposomalbupivacaine AT aaronaberg patientcomplicationsafterinterscaleneblockaretrospectivecomparisonofliposomalbupivacainetononliposomalbupivacaine |
_version_ |
1715477991071416320 |