Interpreting Perceptions about Coastal Fisheries in Sierra Leone: Scapegoats and Panaceas

This paper analyses the myriad perceptions about coastal fisheries in Sierra Leone expressed by respondents in 66 interviews conducted in 2017 and 2020 during two periods of fieldwork in two coastal communities (Tombo and Goderich). Most of these perceptions focused on the respondents’ explanations...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nwamaka Okeke-Ogbuafor, Tim Gray
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-06-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/13/7292
id doaj-7cb7a708f69d435c8d0cfa1a2349ff03
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7cb7a708f69d435c8d0cfa1a2349ff032021-07-15T15:47:17ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502021-06-01137292729210.3390/su13137292Interpreting Perceptions about Coastal Fisheries in Sierra Leone: Scapegoats and PanaceasNwamaka Okeke-Ogbuafor0Tim Gray1School of Geography, Politics and Sociology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UKSchool of Geography, Politics and Sociology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UKThis paper analyses the myriad perceptions about coastal fisheries in Sierra Leone expressed by respondents in 66 interviews conducted in 2017 and 2020 during two periods of fieldwork in two coastal communities (Tombo and Goderich). Most of these perceptions focused on the respondents’ explanations for the dire state of the coastal fisheries, and often these explanations sought ‘scapegoats’ to blame. Our findings are that the main ‘scapegoats’ were foreigners, industrial trawlers, artisanal fishers, fishers’ unions and the government. Other interpretations focused on the respondents’ recommendations for restoring the health of the coastal fisheries, and our findings here are that the main ‘panaceas’ were coercion, sensitisation, and co-management. In discussing these findings, we came to the conclusion that both the identification of scapegoats and the search for panaceas were unhelpful ways of understanding and alleviating the problems facing Sierra Leone’s coastal fisheries because they polarised and over-simplified the issues, sowing divisions between the stakeholders, thereby reinforcing and prolonging the crisis. A more fruitful approach is to look for ways of forging links and establishing partnerships between the disparate players, especially between the government and community organisations.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/13/7292Sierra Leonecoastal fisheriesscapegoatspanaceaspartnerships
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nwamaka Okeke-Ogbuafor
Tim Gray
spellingShingle Nwamaka Okeke-Ogbuafor
Tim Gray
Interpreting Perceptions about Coastal Fisheries in Sierra Leone: Scapegoats and Panaceas
Sustainability
Sierra Leone
coastal fisheries
scapegoats
panaceas
partnerships
author_facet Nwamaka Okeke-Ogbuafor
Tim Gray
author_sort Nwamaka Okeke-Ogbuafor
title Interpreting Perceptions about Coastal Fisheries in Sierra Leone: Scapegoats and Panaceas
title_short Interpreting Perceptions about Coastal Fisheries in Sierra Leone: Scapegoats and Panaceas
title_full Interpreting Perceptions about Coastal Fisheries in Sierra Leone: Scapegoats and Panaceas
title_fullStr Interpreting Perceptions about Coastal Fisheries in Sierra Leone: Scapegoats and Panaceas
title_full_unstemmed Interpreting Perceptions about Coastal Fisheries in Sierra Leone: Scapegoats and Panaceas
title_sort interpreting perceptions about coastal fisheries in sierra leone: scapegoats and panaceas
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2021-06-01
description This paper analyses the myriad perceptions about coastal fisheries in Sierra Leone expressed by respondents in 66 interviews conducted in 2017 and 2020 during two periods of fieldwork in two coastal communities (Tombo and Goderich). Most of these perceptions focused on the respondents’ explanations for the dire state of the coastal fisheries, and often these explanations sought ‘scapegoats’ to blame. Our findings are that the main ‘scapegoats’ were foreigners, industrial trawlers, artisanal fishers, fishers’ unions and the government. Other interpretations focused on the respondents’ recommendations for restoring the health of the coastal fisheries, and our findings here are that the main ‘panaceas’ were coercion, sensitisation, and co-management. In discussing these findings, we came to the conclusion that both the identification of scapegoats and the search for panaceas were unhelpful ways of understanding and alleviating the problems facing Sierra Leone’s coastal fisheries because they polarised and over-simplified the issues, sowing divisions between the stakeholders, thereby reinforcing and prolonging the crisis. A more fruitful approach is to look for ways of forging links and establishing partnerships between the disparate players, especially between the government and community organisations.
topic Sierra Leone
coastal fisheries
scapegoats
panaceas
partnerships
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/13/7292
work_keys_str_mv AT nwamakaokekeogbuafor interpretingperceptionsaboutcoastalfisheriesinsierraleonescapegoatsandpanaceas
AT timgray interpretingperceptionsaboutcoastalfisheriesinsierraleonescapegoatsandpanaceas
_version_ 1721298299642707968