Comparative studies of total-variation-regularized sparse reconstruction algorithms in projection tomography

Projection tomography techniques, such as optical projection tomography and stimulated Raman projection tomography, can efficiently provide quantitative distributions of compositions in three-dimensional volumes that are isotropic and exhibit high spatial resolutions. A projection model and a recons...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hui Xie, Huiyuan Wang, Lin Wang, Nan Wang, Jimin Liang, Yonghua Zhan, Xueli Chen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AIP Publishing LLC 2019-08-01
Series:AIP Advances
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.5116246
id doaj-7cc0dd13cce0483889fe79d2d371160b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7cc0dd13cce0483889fe79d2d371160b2020-11-25T01:02:57ZengAIP Publishing LLCAIP Advances2158-32262019-08-0198085122085122-1110.1063/1.5116246090908ADVComparative studies of total-variation-regularized sparse reconstruction algorithms in projection tomographyHui Xie0Huiyuan Wang1Lin Wang2Nan Wang3Jimin Liang4Yonghua Zhan5Xueli Chen6Engineering Research Center of Molecular and Neuro Imaging of Ministry of Education, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710126, ChinaEngineering Research Center of Molecular and Neuro Imaging of Ministry of Education, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710126, ChinaSchool of Information Sciences and Technology, Northwest University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710127, ChinaEngineering Research Center of Molecular and Neuro Imaging of Ministry of Education, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710126, ChinaEngineering Research Center of Molecular and Neuro Imaging of Ministry of Education, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710126, ChinaEngineering Research Center of Molecular and Neuro Imaging of Ministry of Education, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710126, ChinaEngineering Research Center of Molecular and Neuro Imaging of Ministry of Education, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710126, ChinaProjection tomography techniques, such as optical projection tomography and stimulated Raman projection tomography, can efficiently provide quantitative distributions of compositions in three-dimensional volumes that are isotropic and exhibit high spatial resolutions. A projection model and a reconstruction algorithm are two important elements of such techniques. This research explores the quality vs. efficiency tradeoffs for combinations of existing algorithms in a performance study. Two projection models are used. This first is the pixel vertex driven projection model; and the second is the distance driven projection model (DDM). These models are integrated with three TV-regularized iterative reconstruction algorithms: the algebraic reconstruction technique, the simultaneous algebra reconstruction technique (SART), and the two-step iterative shrinkage/thresholding algorithm. The performance of the combinations of these projection models and reconstruction algorithms are evaluated with a sparsely sampled data set in simulation experiments. The experiments consider both the reconstruction image quality and the time complexity. The comparative results indicate the combination of the SART and DDM algorithms provide a good balance between the quality and efficiency of reconstructed images. The exploratory results of this study are expected to provide some useful guidance on algorithmic development and applications in the projection tomography field.http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.5116246
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hui Xie
Huiyuan Wang
Lin Wang
Nan Wang
Jimin Liang
Yonghua Zhan
Xueli Chen
spellingShingle Hui Xie
Huiyuan Wang
Lin Wang
Nan Wang
Jimin Liang
Yonghua Zhan
Xueli Chen
Comparative studies of total-variation-regularized sparse reconstruction algorithms in projection tomography
AIP Advances
author_facet Hui Xie
Huiyuan Wang
Lin Wang
Nan Wang
Jimin Liang
Yonghua Zhan
Xueli Chen
author_sort Hui Xie
title Comparative studies of total-variation-regularized sparse reconstruction algorithms in projection tomography
title_short Comparative studies of total-variation-regularized sparse reconstruction algorithms in projection tomography
title_full Comparative studies of total-variation-regularized sparse reconstruction algorithms in projection tomography
title_fullStr Comparative studies of total-variation-regularized sparse reconstruction algorithms in projection tomography
title_full_unstemmed Comparative studies of total-variation-regularized sparse reconstruction algorithms in projection tomography
title_sort comparative studies of total-variation-regularized sparse reconstruction algorithms in projection tomography
publisher AIP Publishing LLC
series AIP Advances
issn 2158-3226
publishDate 2019-08-01
description Projection tomography techniques, such as optical projection tomography and stimulated Raman projection tomography, can efficiently provide quantitative distributions of compositions in three-dimensional volumes that are isotropic and exhibit high spatial resolutions. A projection model and a reconstruction algorithm are two important elements of such techniques. This research explores the quality vs. efficiency tradeoffs for combinations of existing algorithms in a performance study. Two projection models are used. This first is the pixel vertex driven projection model; and the second is the distance driven projection model (DDM). These models are integrated with three TV-regularized iterative reconstruction algorithms: the algebraic reconstruction technique, the simultaneous algebra reconstruction technique (SART), and the two-step iterative shrinkage/thresholding algorithm. The performance of the combinations of these projection models and reconstruction algorithms are evaluated with a sparsely sampled data set in simulation experiments. The experiments consider both the reconstruction image quality and the time complexity. The comparative results indicate the combination of the SART and DDM algorithms provide a good balance between the quality and efficiency of reconstructed images. The exploratory results of this study are expected to provide some useful guidance on algorithmic development and applications in the projection tomography field.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.5116246
work_keys_str_mv AT huixie comparativestudiesoftotalvariationregularizedsparsereconstructionalgorithmsinprojectiontomography
AT huiyuanwang comparativestudiesoftotalvariationregularizedsparsereconstructionalgorithmsinprojectiontomography
AT linwang comparativestudiesoftotalvariationregularizedsparsereconstructionalgorithmsinprojectiontomography
AT nanwang comparativestudiesoftotalvariationregularizedsparsereconstructionalgorithmsinprojectiontomography
AT jiminliang comparativestudiesoftotalvariationregularizedsparsereconstructionalgorithmsinprojectiontomography
AT yonghuazhan comparativestudiesoftotalvariationregularizedsparsereconstructionalgorithmsinprojectiontomography
AT xuelichen comparativestudiesoftotalvariationregularizedsparsereconstructionalgorithmsinprojectiontomography
_version_ 1725203009783201792