Adjunctive bright light therapy for treating bipolar depression: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials

Abstract Objectives Bright light therapy (BLT) was reported as an effective adjunctive treatment option for bipolar disorder. Previous meta‐analytic study showed that augmentation treatment with light therapy significantly decreased the severity of bipolar depression. However, most of included studi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hirofumi Hirakawa, Takeshi Terao, Masaaki Muronaga, Nobuyoshi Ishii
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-12-01
Series:Brain and Behavior
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1876
id doaj-7cd0ecfa1e55471487a112a65ca54a17
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7cd0ecfa1e55471487a112a65ca54a172021-03-10T17:10:35ZengWileyBrain and Behavior2162-32792020-12-011012n/an/a10.1002/brb3.1876Adjunctive bright light therapy for treating bipolar depression: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trialsHirofumi Hirakawa0Takeshi Terao1Masaaki Muronaga2Nobuyoshi Ishii3Department of Neuropsychiatry Faculty of Medicine Oita University Oita JapanDepartment of Neuropsychiatry Faculty of Medicine Oita University Oita JapanDepartment of Neuropsychiatry Faculty of Medicine Oita University Oita JapanDepartment of Neuropsychiatry Faculty of Medicine Oita University Oita JapanAbstract Objectives Bright light therapy (BLT) was reported as an effective adjunctive treatment option for bipolar disorder. Previous meta‐analytic study showed that augmentation treatment with light therapy significantly decreased the severity of bipolar depression. However, most of included studies were case–control studies and several of them focused on BLT that was provided in combination with sleep deprivation therapy. Methods In this meta‐analysis, we used several electronic databases to search the studies and included only randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies to compare BLT with control experimental groups for treating bipolar depression with pharmacological treatment to clarify the adjunctive efficacy of BLT. We searched the databases of EMBASE, MEDLINE, Scopus, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Clinicaltrials.gov for studies published in English until September 19, 2019. Two researchers conducted the literature screening, data extraction, and methodological quality assessment independently. The main outcome was the response rate and remission rate. We used the Review Manager 5.3 Software for the meta‐analysis. Results Four trials with a total of 190 participants (intervention: 94, control: 96) with bipolar depression were evaluated to gauge the effects of light therapy. The meta‐analysis showed risk ratios of 1.78 (95% CI 1.24–2.56, p = .002; I2 = 17%) demonstrating a significant effect of light therapy in the response rate of bipolar disorder. The meta‐analysis shows risk ratios of 2.03 (95% CI 0.48–8.59, p = .34; I2 = 67%) demonstrating no significant effect of light therapy in the remission rate of patients with bipolar disorder. None of the articles reported any serious adverse effects. Manic switch rate was 1.1% in the light therapy group and 1.2% in the control group. Conclusions Bright light therapy is an effective treatment for reducing depression symptoms among patients with bipolar depression.https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1876bipolar disorderbright light therapymeta‐analysisrandomized control trials
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hirofumi Hirakawa
Takeshi Terao
Masaaki Muronaga
Nobuyoshi Ishii
spellingShingle Hirofumi Hirakawa
Takeshi Terao
Masaaki Muronaga
Nobuyoshi Ishii
Adjunctive bright light therapy for treating bipolar depression: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
Brain and Behavior
bipolar disorder
bright light therapy
meta‐analysis
randomized control trials
author_facet Hirofumi Hirakawa
Takeshi Terao
Masaaki Muronaga
Nobuyoshi Ishii
author_sort Hirofumi Hirakawa
title Adjunctive bright light therapy for treating bipolar depression: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_short Adjunctive bright light therapy for treating bipolar depression: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full Adjunctive bright light therapy for treating bipolar depression: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Adjunctive bright light therapy for treating bipolar depression: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Adjunctive bright light therapy for treating bipolar depression: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_sort adjunctive bright light therapy for treating bipolar depression: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
publisher Wiley
series Brain and Behavior
issn 2162-3279
publishDate 2020-12-01
description Abstract Objectives Bright light therapy (BLT) was reported as an effective adjunctive treatment option for bipolar disorder. Previous meta‐analytic study showed that augmentation treatment with light therapy significantly decreased the severity of bipolar depression. However, most of included studies were case–control studies and several of them focused on BLT that was provided in combination with sleep deprivation therapy. Methods In this meta‐analysis, we used several electronic databases to search the studies and included only randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies to compare BLT with control experimental groups for treating bipolar depression with pharmacological treatment to clarify the adjunctive efficacy of BLT. We searched the databases of EMBASE, MEDLINE, Scopus, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Clinicaltrials.gov for studies published in English until September 19, 2019. Two researchers conducted the literature screening, data extraction, and methodological quality assessment independently. The main outcome was the response rate and remission rate. We used the Review Manager 5.3 Software for the meta‐analysis. Results Four trials with a total of 190 participants (intervention: 94, control: 96) with bipolar depression were evaluated to gauge the effects of light therapy. The meta‐analysis showed risk ratios of 1.78 (95% CI 1.24–2.56, p = .002; I2 = 17%) demonstrating a significant effect of light therapy in the response rate of bipolar disorder. The meta‐analysis shows risk ratios of 2.03 (95% CI 0.48–8.59, p = .34; I2 = 67%) demonstrating no significant effect of light therapy in the remission rate of patients with bipolar disorder. None of the articles reported any serious adverse effects. Manic switch rate was 1.1% in the light therapy group and 1.2% in the control group. Conclusions Bright light therapy is an effective treatment for reducing depression symptoms among patients with bipolar depression.
topic bipolar disorder
bright light therapy
meta‐analysis
randomized control trials
url https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1876
work_keys_str_mv AT hirofumihirakawa adjunctivebrightlighttherapyfortreatingbipolardepressionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT takeshiterao adjunctivebrightlighttherapyfortreatingbipolardepressionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT masaakimuronaga adjunctivebrightlighttherapyfortreatingbipolardepressionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT nobuyoshiishii adjunctivebrightlighttherapyfortreatingbipolardepressionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
_version_ 1724226580759183360