Critical Natural Resources: Challenging the Current Discourse and Proposal for a Holistic Definition

Studies on critical natural resources have grown in number over the last decade out of concern for resource availability and its potential impacts. Nonetheless, only a handful of studies explicitly define criticality for natural resources. Through a systematic literature review, we identified four m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marie K. Schellens, Johanna Gisladottir
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-12-01
Series:Resources
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/7/4/79
id doaj-7d0880611b384260aa5079c1ba9f1ee9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7d0880611b384260aa5079c1ba9f1ee92020-11-24T22:52:32ZengMDPI AGResources2079-92762018-12-01747910.3390/resources7040079resources7040079Critical Natural Resources: Challenging the Current Discourse and Proposal for a Holistic DefinitionMarie K. Schellens0Johanna Gisladottir1Department of Physical Geography, Environment and Resource Dynamics Group, Stockholm University, 114 19 Stockholm, SwedenDepartment of Physical Geography, Environment and Resource Dynamics Group, Stockholm University, 114 19 Stockholm, SwedenStudies on critical natural resources have grown in number over the last decade out of concern for resource availability and its potential impacts. Nonetheless, only a handful of studies explicitly define criticality for natural resources. Through a systematic literature review, we identified four main perspectives in the descriptions of critical natural resources: (1) economic importance is overemphasized at the expense of sociocultural and ecosystem support functions of natural resources; (2) a Western perspective dominates the research discourse; (3) apart from the field of economics, the debate lacks input from social sciences; and (4), non-renewable resources are overrepresented compared to renewables. Based on the current discourse and its apparent inclinations, we propose a new definition of criticality for natural resources aligned with risk theory. We argue for the need to balance out the perspectives described above to provide decision-makers with impartial information for the sustainable management of natural resources.https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/7/4/79criticalcriticalitydefinitionnatural capitalnatural resourcesraw materialssystematic mapping
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marie K. Schellens
Johanna Gisladottir
spellingShingle Marie K. Schellens
Johanna Gisladottir
Critical Natural Resources: Challenging the Current Discourse and Proposal for a Holistic Definition
Resources
critical
criticality
definition
natural capital
natural resources
raw materials
systematic mapping
author_facet Marie K. Schellens
Johanna Gisladottir
author_sort Marie K. Schellens
title Critical Natural Resources: Challenging the Current Discourse and Proposal for a Holistic Definition
title_short Critical Natural Resources: Challenging the Current Discourse and Proposal for a Holistic Definition
title_full Critical Natural Resources: Challenging the Current Discourse and Proposal for a Holistic Definition
title_fullStr Critical Natural Resources: Challenging the Current Discourse and Proposal for a Holistic Definition
title_full_unstemmed Critical Natural Resources: Challenging the Current Discourse and Proposal for a Holistic Definition
title_sort critical natural resources: challenging the current discourse and proposal for a holistic definition
publisher MDPI AG
series Resources
issn 2079-9276
publishDate 2018-12-01
description Studies on critical natural resources have grown in number over the last decade out of concern for resource availability and its potential impacts. Nonetheless, only a handful of studies explicitly define criticality for natural resources. Through a systematic literature review, we identified four main perspectives in the descriptions of critical natural resources: (1) economic importance is overemphasized at the expense of sociocultural and ecosystem support functions of natural resources; (2) a Western perspective dominates the research discourse; (3) apart from the field of economics, the debate lacks input from social sciences; and (4), non-renewable resources are overrepresented compared to renewables. Based on the current discourse and its apparent inclinations, we propose a new definition of criticality for natural resources aligned with risk theory. We argue for the need to balance out the perspectives described above to provide decision-makers with impartial information for the sustainable management of natural resources.
topic critical
criticality
definition
natural capital
natural resources
raw materials
systematic mapping
url https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/7/4/79
work_keys_str_mv AT mariekschellens criticalnaturalresourceschallengingthecurrentdiscourseandproposalforaholisticdefinition
AT johannagisladottir criticalnaturalresourceschallengingthecurrentdiscourseandproposalforaholisticdefinition
_version_ 1725665590866083840