Two Faces of the Polish Supreme Court After 'Reforms' of the Judiciary System in Poland: The Question of Judicial Independence and Appointments

(Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2020 5(1), 347-362 | European Forum Insight of 2 June 2020 | (Table of Contents) I. Introduction. - II. The "reforms" of the national council of judiciary and the Supreme Court. - III. The Court of Justice judgment. -...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Michał Ziółkowski
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: European Papers (www.europeanpapers.eu) 2020-06-01
Series:European Papers
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.europeanpapers.eu/en/europeanforum/two-faces-of-polish-supreme-court-after-reforms-of-judiciary-system-in-poland
id doaj-7d142e7c677840928fc705a46ca52173
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7d142e7c677840928fc705a46ca521732021-01-03T17:53:16ZengEuropean Papers (www.europeanpapers.eu)European Papers2499-82492020-06-012020 5134736210.15166/2499-8249/362Two Faces of the Polish Supreme Court After 'Reforms' of the Judiciary System in Poland: The Question of Judicial Independence and AppointmentsMichał Ziółkowski0European University Institute(Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2020 5(1), 347-362 | European Forum Insight of 2 June 2020 | (Table of Contents) I. Introduction. - II. The "reforms" of the national council of judiciary and the Supreme Court. - III. The Court of Justice judgment. - IV. The EU-friendly face of the Supreme Court. - V. The restrained face of the Supreme Court. - VI. Conclusions. | (Abstract) The present Insight compares the decisions of two chambers of the Polish Supreme Court regarding the domestic enforcement, under the terms laid down in the Polish Constitution, of a judgment of the Court of Justice, the independence of the judicial branch and the consequences of a judicial appointment. The starting point for the analysis is an overview of recent reforms of judiciary in Poland and the judgment of the Court of Justice in A.K. (Indépendance de la chambre disciplinaire de la Cour suprême) [GC] (judgement of 19 November 2019, joined cases C-585/18, C-624/18 and C-625/18). The first discussed ruling of the Supreme Court aimed to fully enforce that judgment of the Court of Justice, whereas the second sought to limit its actual impact.https://www.europeanpapers.eu/en/europeanforum/two-faces-of-polish-supreme-court-after-reforms-of-judiciary-system-in-polandindependenceimpartialitycourt of justicepolish supreme courtnational council of the judiciarypoland
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Michał Ziółkowski
spellingShingle Michał Ziółkowski
Two Faces of the Polish Supreme Court After 'Reforms' of the Judiciary System in Poland: The Question of Judicial Independence and Appointments
European Papers
independence
impartiality
court of justice
polish supreme court
national council of the judiciary
poland
author_facet Michał Ziółkowski
author_sort Michał Ziółkowski
title Two Faces of the Polish Supreme Court After 'Reforms' of the Judiciary System in Poland: The Question of Judicial Independence and Appointments
title_short Two Faces of the Polish Supreme Court After 'Reforms' of the Judiciary System in Poland: The Question of Judicial Independence and Appointments
title_full Two Faces of the Polish Supreme Court After 'Reforms' of the Judiciary System in Poland: The Question of Judicial Independence and Appointments
title_fullStr Two Faces of the Polish Supreme Court After 'Reforms' of the Judiciary System in Poland: The Question of Judicial Independence and Appointments
title_full_unstemmed Two Faces of the Polish Supreme Court After 'Reforms' of the Judiciary System in Poland: The Question of Judicial Independence and Appointments
title_sort two faces of the polish supreme court after 'reforms' of the judiciary system in poland: the question of judicial independence and appointments
publisher European Papers (www.europeanpapers.eu)
series European Papers
issn 2499-8249
publishDate 2020-06-01
description (Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2020 5(1), 347-362 | European Forum Insight of 2 June 2020 | (Table of Contents) I. Introduction. - II. The "reforms" of the national council of judiciary and the Supreme Court. - III. The Court of Justice judgment. - IV. The EU-friendly face of the Supreme Court. - V. The restrained face of the Supreme Court. - VI. Conclusions. | (Abstract) The present Insight compares the decisions of two chambers of the Polish Supreme Court regarding the domestic enforcement, under the terms laid down in the Polish Constitution, of a judgment of the Court of Justice, the independence of the judicial branch and the consequences of a judicial appointment. The starting point for the analysis is an overview of recent reforms of judiciary in Poland and the judgment of the Court of Justice in A.K. (Indépendance de la chambre disciplinaire de la Cour suprême) [GC] (judgement of 19 November 2019, joined cases C-585/18, C-624/18 and C-625/18). The first discussed ruling of the Supreme Court aimed to fully enforce that judgment of the Court of Justice, whereas the second sought to limit its actual impact.
topic independence
impartiality
court of justice
polish supreme court
national council of the judiciary
poland
url https://www.europeanpapers.eu/en/europeanforum/two-faces-of-polish-supreme-court-after-reforms-of-judiciary-system-in-poland
work_keys_str_mv AT michałziołkowski twofacesofthepolishsupremecourtafterreformsofthejudiciarysysteminpolandthequestionofjudicialindependenceandappointments
_version_ 1724350232127340544