Insights from the Slovak Hybrid Mail Services Case.Case Comment to the Judgement of the General Courtof 25 March 2015 and Order of Court of Justice of the EUof 30 June 2016Slovenská pošta v Commission (Cases T-556/08, C-293/15P)

Insights from the Slovak Hybrid Mail Services Case.Case Comment to the Judgement of the General Courtof 25 March 2015 and Order of Court of Justice of the EUof 30 June 2016Slovenská pošta v Commission (Cases T-556/08, C-293/15P)

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Karolis Kačerauskas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Warsaw 2017-12-01
Series:Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies
Subjects:
dominant position
postal sector
statutory monopoly
Online Access:https://www.yars.wz.uw.edu.pl/yars2017_10_16/191.pdf
id doaj-7d25ccba35dd41eea8939db0e6f7c904
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7d25ccba35dd41eea8939db0e6f7c9042020-11-25T03:52:34ZengUniversity of WarsawYearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies1689-90242545-01152017-12-01101619120310.7172/1689-9024.YARS.2017.10.16.10Insights from the Slovak Hybrid Mail Services Case.Case Comment to the Judgement of the General Courtof 25 March 2015 and Order of Court of Justice of the EUof 30 June 2016Slovenská pošta v Commission (Cases T-556/08, C-293/15P)Karolis Kačerauskas0Mykolas Romeris University, Vilnius, Lithuania,https://www.yars.wz.uw.edu.pl/yars2017_10_16/191.pdfdominant positionpostal sectorstatutory monopoly
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Karolis Kačerauskas
spellingShingle Karolis Kačerauskas
Insights from the Slovak Hybrid Mail Services Case.Case Comment to the Judgement of the General Courtof 25 March 2015 and Order of Court of Justice of the EUof 30 June 2016Slovenská pošta v Commission (Cases T-556/08, C-293/15P)
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies
dominant position
postal sector
statutory monopoly
author_facet Karolis Kačerauskas
author_sort Karolis Kačerauskas
title Insights from the Slovak Hybrid Mail Services Case.Case Comment to the Judgement of the General Courtof 25 March 2015 and Order of Court of Justice of the EUof 30 June 2016Slovenská pošta v Commission (Cases T-556/08, C-293/15P)
title_short Insights from the Slovak Hybrid Mail Services Case.Case Comment to the Judgement of the General Courtof 25 March 2015 and Order of Court of Justice of the EUof 30 June 2016Slovenská pošta v Commission (Cases T-556/08, C-293/15P)
title_full Insights from the Slovak Hybrid Mail Services Case.Case Comment to the Judgement of the General Courtof 25 March 2015 and Order of Court of Justice of the EUof 30 June 2016Slovenská pošta v Commission (Cases T-556/08, C-293/15P)
title_fullStr Insights from the Slovak Hybrid Mail Services Case.Case Comment to the Judgement of the General Courtof 25 March 2015 and Order of Court of Justice of the EUof 30 June 2016Slovenská pošta v Commission (Cases T-556/08, C-293/15P)
title_full_unstemmed Insights from the Slovak Hybrid Mail Services Case.Case Comment to the Judgement of the General Courtof 25 March 2015 and Order of Court of Justice of the EUof 30 June 2016Slovenská pošta v Commission (Cases T-556/08, C-293/15P)
title_sort insights from the slovak hybrid mail services case.case comment to the judgement of the general courtof 25 march 2015 and order of court of justice of the euof 30 june 2016slovenská pošta v commission (cases t-556/08, c-293/15p)
publisher University of Warsaw
series Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies
issn 1689-9024
2545-0115
publishDate 2017-12-01
topic dominant position
postal sector
statutory monopoly
url https://www.yars.wz.uw.edu.pl/yars2017_10_16/191.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT karoliskacerauskas insightsfromtheslovakhybridmailservicescasecasecommenttothejudgementofthegeneralcourtof25march2015andorderofcourtofjusticeoftheeuof30june2016slovenskapostavcommissioncasest55608c29315p
_version_ 1724482154272915456

Similar Items