Analysis of surface roughness and three-dimensional scanning topography of zirconia implants before and after photofunctionalization by atomic force microscopy: An In Vitro study

Aim: To analyze surface roughness and three-dimensional (3D) scanning topography parameters of zirconia implants before and after photofunctionalization by atomic force microscopy (AFM). Materials and Methods: Ten commercially available zirconia implants five each in the study and control group were...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: R Arun Jaikumar, Suma Karthigeyan, T R Ramesh Bhat, Madhulika Naidu, G R Praveen Raj, Senthil Natarajan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2021-01-01
Series:Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2021;volume=13;issue=5;spage=766;epage=771;aulast=Jaikumar
id doaj-7d385adbd5754d4c902ec6e2db887921
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7d385adbd5754d4c902ec6e2db8879212021-06-15T04:48:44ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences0975-74062021-01-0113576677110.4103/jpbs.JPBS_724_20Analysis of surface roughness and three-dimensional scanning topography of zirconia implants before and after photofunctionalization by atomic force microscopy: An In Vitro studyR Arun JaikumarSuma KarthigeyanT R Ramesh BhatMadhulika NaiduG R Praveen RajSenthil NatarajanAim: To analyze surface roughness and three-dimensional (3D) scanning topography parameters of zirconia implants before and after photofunctionalization by atomic force microscopy (AFM). Materials and Methods: Ten commercially available zirconia implants five each in the study and control group were taken. The study group was subjected to ultraviolet (UV) radiation for 48 h using the shorter wavelength of 254 nm. After washing all the implants with 70% alcohol and drying, 3D surface topography and roughness parameters were analyzed using CSC 17 probe AFM at three different magnifications 25 μm, 50 μm, and 80 μm, respectively. Results: The surface topography and calculated mean amplitude, spatial, and hybrid parameters of the study group were higher than the control group (P < 0.05) in all three magnifications. Up to scale depth and peak value for the study and control group were (−0.4–0.4: −2-1) (−0.75 to 0.6:−1–1.3) (−0.75-−0.5: −1.5-1.3) for the study and control group at 25, 50, and 80 μm magnification, respectively. This indicates that photofunctionalization increased surface roughness of Zirconia implants to desirable extent. Conclusion: There is a definite difference in the quantitative topographic characteristics with zirconia implants being microroughned after photofunctionalization (UV treatment).http://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2021;volume=13;issue=5;spage=766;epage=771;aulast=Jaikumaratomic force microscopyimplantsphotofunctionalizationroughness parameterssurface topography
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author R Arun Jaikumar
Suma Karthigeyan
T R Ramesh Bhat
Madhulika Naidu
G R Praveen Raj
Senthil Natarajan
spellingShingle R Arun Jaikumar
Suma Karthigeyan
T R Ramesh Bhat
Madhulika Naidu
G R Praveen Raj
Senthil Natarajan
Analysis of surface roughness and three-dimensional scanning topography of zirconia implants before and after photofunctionalization by atomic force microscopy: An In Vitro study
Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences
atomic force microscopy
implants
photofunctionalization
roughness parameters
surface topography
author_facet R Arun Jaikumar
Suma Karthigeyan
T R Ramesh Bhat
Madhulika Naidu
G R Praveen Raj
Senthil Natarajan
author_sort R Arun Jaikumar
title Analysis of surface roughness and three-dimensional scanning topography of zirconia implants before and after photofunctionalization by atomic force microscopy: An In Vitro study
title_short Analysis of surface roughness and three-dimensional scanning topography of zirconia implants before and after photofunctionalization by atomic force microscopy: An In Vitro study
title_full Analysis of surface roughness and three-dimensional scanning topography of zirconia implants before and after photofunctionalization by atomic force microscopy: An In Vitro study
title_fullStr Analysis of surface roughness and three-dimensional scanning topography of zirconia implants before and after photofunctionalization by atomic force microscopy: An In Vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of surface roughness and three-dimensional scanning topography of zirconia implants before and after photofunctionalization by atomic force microscopy: An In Vitro study
title_sort analysis of surface roughness and three-dimensional scanning topography of zirconia implants before and after photofunctionalization by atomic force microscopy: an in vitro study
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences
issn 0975-7406
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Aim: To analyze surface roughness and three-dimensional (3D) scanning topography parameters of zirconia implants before and after photofunctionalization by atomic force microscopy (AFM). Materials and Methods: Ten commercially available zirconia implants five each in the study and control group were taken. The study group was subjected to ultraviolet (UV) radiation for 48 h using the shorter wavelength of 254 nm. After washing all the implants with 70% alcohol and drying, 3D surface topography and roughness parameters were analyzed using CSC 17 probe AFM at three different magnifications 25 μm, 50 μm, and 80 μm, respectively. Results: The surface topography and calculated mean amplitude, spatial, and hybrid parameters of the study group were higher than the control group (P < 0.05) in all three magnifications. Up to scale depth and peak value for the study and control group were (−0.4–0.4: −2-1) (−0.75 to 0.6:−1–1.3) (−0.75-−0.5: −1.5-1.3) for the study and control group at 25, 50, and 80 μm magnification, respectively. This indicates that photofunctionalization increased surface roughness of Zirconia implants to desirable extent. Conclusion: There is a definite difference in the quantitative topographic characteristics with zirconia implants being microroughned after photofunctionalization (UV treatment).
topic atomic force microscopy
implants
photofunctionalization
roughness parameters
surface topography
url http://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2021;volume=13;issue=5;spage=766;epage=771;aulast=Jaikumar
work_keys_str_mv AT rarunjaikumar analysisofsurfaceroughnessandthreedimensionalscanningtopographyofzirconiaimplantsbeforeandafterphotofunctionalizationbyatomicforcemicroscopyaninvitrostudy
AT sumakarthigeyan analysisofsurfaceroughnessandthreedimensionalscanningtopographyofzirconiaimplantsbeforeandafterphotofunctionalizationbyatomicforcemicroscopyaninvitrostudy
AT trrameshbhat analysisofsurfaceroughnessandthreedimensionalscanningtopographyofzirconiaimplantsbeforeandafterphotofunctionalizationbyatomicforcemicroscopyaninvitrostudy
AT madhulikanaidu analysisofsurfaceroughnessandthreedimensionalscanningtopographyofzirconiaimplantsbeforeandafterphotofunctionalizationbyatomicforcemicroscopyaninvitrostudy
AT grpraveenraj analysisofsurfaceroughnessandthreedimensionalscanningtopographyofzirconiaimplantsbeforeandafterphotofunctionalizationbyatomicforcemicroscopyaninvitrostudy
AT senthilnatarajan analysisofsurfaceroughnessandthreedimensionalscanningtopographyofzirconiaimplantsbeforeandafterphotofunctionalizationbyatomicforcemicroscopyaninvitrostudy
_version_ 1721377334736453632