Analysis of surface roughness and three-dimensional scanning topography of zirconia implants before and after photofunctionalization by atomic force microscopy: An In Vitro study
Aim: To analyze surface roughness and three-dimensional (3D) scanning topography parameters of zirconia implants before and after photofunctionalization by atomic force microscopy (AFM). Materials and Methods: Ten commercially available zirconia implants five each in the study and control group were...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2021-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2021;volume=13;issue=5;spage=766;epage=771;aulast=Jaikumar |
id |
doaj-7d385adbd5754d4c902ec6e2db887921 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-7d385adbd5754d4c902ec6e2db8879212021-06-15T04:48:44ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences0975-74062021-01-0113576677110.4103/jpbs.JPBS_724_20Analysis of surface roughness and three-dimensional scanning topography of zirconia implants before and after photofunctionalization by atomic force microscopy: An In Vitro studyR Arun JaikumarSuma KarthigeyanT R Ramesh BhatMadhulika NaiduG R Praveen RajSenthil NatarajanAim: To analyze surface roughness and three-dimensional (3D) scanning topography parameters of zirconia implants before and after photofunctionalization by atomic force microscopy (AFM). Materials and Methods: Ten commercially available zirconia implants five each in the study and control group were taken. The study group was subjected to ultraviolet (UV) radiation for 48 h using the shorter wavelength of 254 nm. After washing all the implants with 70% alcohol and drying, 3D surface topography and roughness parameters were analyzed using CSC 17 probe AFM at three different magnifications 25 μm, 50 μm, and 80 μm, respectively. Results: The surface topography and calculated mean amplitude, spatial, and hybrid parameters of the study group were higher than the control group (P < 0.05) in all three magnifications. Up to scale depth and peak value for the study and control group were (−0.4–0.4: −2-1) (−0.75 to 0.6:−1–1.3) (−0.75-−0.5: −1.5-1.3) for the study and control group at 25, 50, and 80 μm magnification, respectively. This indicates that photofunctionalization increased surface roughness of Zirconia implants to desirable extent. Conclusion: There is a definite difference in the quantitative topographic characteristics with zirconia implants being microroughned after photofunctionalization (UV treatment).http://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2021;volume=13;issue=5;spage=766;epage=771;aulast=Jaikumaratomic force microscopyimplantsphotofunctionalizationroughness parameterssurface topography |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
R Arun Jaikumar Suma Karthigeyan T R Ramesh Bhat Madhulika Naidu G R Praveen Raj Senthil Natarajan |
spellingShingle |
R Arun Jaikumar Suma Karthigeyan T R Ramesh Bhat Madhulika Naidu G R Praveen Raj Senthil Natarajan Analysis of surface roughness and three-dimensional scanning topography of zirconia implants before and after photofunctionalization by atomic force microscopy: An In Vitro study Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences atomic force microscopy implants photofunctionalization roughness parameters surface topography |
author_facet |
R Arun Jaikumar Suma Karthigeyan T R Ramesh Bhat Madhulika Naidu G R Praveen Raj Senthil Natarajan |
author_sort |
R Arun Jaikumar |
title |
Analysis of surface roughness and three-dimensional scanning topography of zirconia implants before and after photofunctionalization by atomic force microscopy: An In Vitro study |
title_short |
Analysis of surface roughness and three-dimensional scanning topography of zirconia implants before and after photofunctionalization by atomic force microscopy: An In Vitro study |
title_full |
Analysis of surface roughness and three-dimensional scanning topography of zirconia implants before and after photofunctionalization by atomic force microscopy: An In Vitro study |
title_fullStr |
Analysis of surface roughness and three-dimensional scanning topography of zirconia implants before and after photofunctionalization by atomic force microscopy: An In Vitro study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Analysis of surface roughness and three-dimensional scanning topography of zirconia implants before and after photofunctionalization by atomic force microscopy: An In Vitro study |
title_sort |
analysis of surface roughness and three-dimensional scanning topography of zirconia implants before and after photofunctionalization by atomic force microscopy: an in vitro study |
publisher |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
series |
Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences |
issn |
0975-7406 |
publishDate |
2021-01-01 |
description |
Aim: To analyze surface roughness and three-dimensional (3D) scanning topography parameters of zirconia implants before and after photofunctionalization by atomic force microscopy (AFM). Materials and Methods: Ten commercially available zirconia implants five each in the study and control group were taken. The study group was subjected to ultraviolet (UV) radiation for 48 h using the shorter wavelength of 254 nm. After washing all the implants with 70% alcohol and drying, 3D surface topography and roughness parameters were analyzed using CSC 17 probe AFM at three different magnifications 25 μm, 50 μm, and 80 μm, respectively. Results: The surface topography and calculated mean amplitude, spatial, and hybrid parameters of the study group were higher than the control group (P < 0.05) in all three magnifications. Up to scale depth and peak value for the study and control group were (−0.4–0.4: −2-1) (−0.75 to 0.6:−1–1.3) (−0.75-−0.5: −1.5-1.3) for the study and control group at 25, 50, and 80 μm magnification, respectively. This indicates that photofunctionalization increased surface roughness of Zirconia implants to desirable extent. Conclusion: There is a definite difference in the quantitative topographic characteristics with zirconia implants being microroughned after photofunctionalization (UV treatment). |
topic |
atomic force microscopy implants photofunctionalization roughness parameters surface topography |
url |
http://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2021;volume=13;issue=5;spage=766;epage=771;aulast=Jaikumar |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT rarunjaikumar analysisofsurfaceroughnessandthreedimensionalscanningtopographyofzirconiaimplantsbeforeandafterphotofunctionalizationbyatomicforcemicroscopyaninvitrostudy AT sumakarthigeyan analysisofsurfaceroughnessandthreedimensionalscanningtopographyofzirconiaimplantsbeforeandafterphotofunctionalizationbyatomicforcemicroscopyaninvitrostudy AT trrameshbhat analysisofsurfaceroughnessandthreedimensionalscanningtopographyofzirconiaimplantsbeforeandafterphotofunctionalizationbyatomicforcemicroscopyaninvitrostudy AT madhulikanaidu analysisofsurfaceroughnessandthreedimensionalscanningtopographyofzirconiaimplantsbeforeandafterphotofunctionalizationbyatomicforcemicroscopyaninvitrostudy AT grpraveenraj analysisofsurfaceroughnessandthreedimensionalscanningtopographyofzirconiaimplantsbeforeandafterphotofunctionalizationbyatomicforcemicroscopyaninvitrostudy AT senthilnatarajan analysisofsurfaceroughnessandthreedimensionalscanningtopographyofzirconiaimplantsbeforeandafterphotofunctionalizationbyatomicforcemicroscopyaninvitrostudy |
_version_ |
1721377334736453632 |