Evaluation of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery intraocular lens calculator for eyes with prior radial keratotomy

David L DeMill, Maylon Hsu, Majid MoshirfarJohn A Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USABackground: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) intraocular lens (IOL) calculator for eyes with prior radial keratotomy...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: DeMill DL, Hsu M, Moshirfar M
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2011-08-01
Series:Clinical Ophthalmology
Online Access:http://www.dovepress.com/evaluation-of-the-american-society-of-cataract-and-refractive-surgery--a8188
id doaj-7d592ff556b54edcb086328fd0156cd9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7d592ff556b54edcb086328fd0156cd92020-11-25T01:36:34ZengDove Medical PressClinical Ophthalmology1177-54671177-54832011-08-012011default12431247Evaluation of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery intraocular lens calculator for eyes with prior radial keratotomyDeMill DLHsu MMoshirfar MDavid L DeMill, Maylon Hsu, Majid MoshirfarJohn A Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USABackground: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) intraocular lens (IOL) calculator for eyes with prior radial keratotomy and assess the accuracy of its methods in predicting IOL power in patients with previous radial keratotomy.Methods: This retrospective study included data from 15 eyes with previous radial keratotomy and subsequent cataract surgery. The average central power and Humphrey Atlas methods from the ASCRS IOL calculator, along with an average IOL power produced from an average of these two methods (ASCRS average), were compared. Primary outcome measures for each method were mean arithmetic and absolute IOL prediction error, variance in mean arithmetic IOL prediction error, and the percentage of refractive outcomes within ±0.50, ±1.00, ±1.50, and ±2.00 diopters (D).Results: The average central power method and the ASCRS average were significantly more accurate than the Humphrey Atlas method in terms of mean absolute IOL prediction error (1.03 D and 1.02 D versus 1.53; P = 0.04 and P = 0.01, respectively). In addition, the average central power method and ASCRS average produced a higher percentage of refractive outcomes within ±0.50 D when compared with the Humphrey Atlas method (60% and 46.67% versus 0%, respectively). A comparison of the average central power method and the ASCRS average demonstrated a smaller variance and higher percentage of patients within ±1.00 D when using the ASCRS average.Conclusion: The ASCRS calculator for eyes with prior radial keratotomy is an easily accessible and valuable online tool for calculating IOL power in patients with previous radial keratotomy. We found that the ASCRS average produced by the calculator provided the best IOL prediction. We recommend using it with the addition of 1.00 to 1.50 D to its IOL power prediction.Keywords: radial keratotomy, cataract, intraocular lens calculator, American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeryhttp://www.dovepress.com/evaluation-of-the-american-society-of-cataract-and-refractive-surgery--a8188
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author DeMill DL
Hsu M
Moshirfar M
spellingShingle DeMill DL
Hsu M
Moshirfar M
Evaluation of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery intraocular lens calculator for eyes with prior radial keratotomy
Clinical Ophthalmology
author_facet DeMill DL
Hsu M
Moshirfar M
author_sort DeMill DL
title Evaluation of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery intraocular lens calculator for eyes with prior radial keratotomy
title_short Evaluation of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery intraocular lens calculator for eyes with prior radial keratotomy
title_full Evaluation of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery intraocular lens calculator for eyes with prior radial keratotomy
title_fullStr Evaluation of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery intraocular lens calculator for eyes with prior radial keratotomy
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery intraocular lens calculator for eyes with prior radial keratotomy
title_sort evaluation of the american society of cataract and refractive surgery intraocular lens calculator for eyes with prior radial keratotomy
publisher Dove Medical Press
series Clinical Ophthalmology
issn 1177-5467
1177-5483
publishDate 2011-08-01
description David L DeMill, Maylon Hsu, Majid MoshirfarJohn A Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USABackground: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) intraocular lens (IOL) calculator for eyes with prior radial keratotomy and assess the accuracy of its methods in predicting IOL power in patients with previous radial keratotomy.Methods: This retrospective study included data from 15 eyes with previous radial keratotomy and subsequent cataract surgery. The average central power and Humphrey Atlas methods from the ASCRS IOL calculator, along with an average IOL power produced from an average of these two methods (ASCRS average), were compared. Primary outcome measures for each method were mean arithmetic and absolute IOL prediction error, variance in mean arithmetic IOL prediction error, and the percentage of refractive outcomes within ±0.50, ±1.00, ±1.50, and ±2.00 diopters (D).Results: The average central power method and the ASCRS average were significantly more accurate than the Humphrey Atlas method in terms of mean absolute IOL prediction error (1.03 D and 1.02 D versus 1.53; P = 0.04 and P = 0.01, respectively). In addition, the average central power method and ASCRS average produced a higher percentage of refractive outcomes within ±0.50 D when compared with the Humphrey Atlas method (60% and 46.67% versus 0%, respectively). A comparison of the average central power method and the ASCRS average demonstrated a smaller variance and higher percentage of patients within ±1.00 D when using the ASCRS average.Conclusion: The ASCRS calculator for eyes with prior radial keratotomy is an easily accessible and valuable online tool for calculating IOL power in patients with previous radial keratotomy. We found that the ASCRS average produced by the calculator provided the best IOL prediction. We recommend using it with the addition of 1.00 to 1.50 D to its IOL power prediction.Keywords: radial keratotomy, cataract, intraocular lens calculator, American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery
url http://www.dovepress.com/evaluation-of-the-american-society-of-cataract-and-refractive-surgery--a8188
work_keys_str_mv AT demilldl evaluationoftheamericansocietyofcataractandrefractivesurgeryintraocularlenscalculatorforeyeswithpriorradialkeratotomy
AT hsum evaluationoftheamericansocietyofcataractandrefractivesurgeryintraocularlenscalculatorforeyeswithpriorradialkeratotomy
AT moshirfarm evaluationoftheamericansocietyofcataractandrefractivesurgeryintraocularlenscalculatorforeyeswithpriorradialkeratotomy
_version_ 1725062261931769856