Objects as identity markers – Ways of mediating the past in a South Sámi and Norse borderland

Museums have several means of communicating with their audiences. The problems discussed here concern how local museums interact with their audience when the past they want to portray is multiple, complex and sometimes disputed. It is based on an analysis of three exhibitions in local museums situat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Grete Swensen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Leicester 2017-07-01
Series:Museum & Society
Online Access:https://journals.le.ac.uk/ojs1/index.php/mas/article/view/834
id doaj-7d5c637b57de44fa83b54378d1d3b0cb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7d5c637b57de44fa83b54378d1d3b0cb2020-11-24T21:17:55ZengUniversity of LeicesterMuseum & Society1479-83602017-07-0115223625810.29311/mas.v15i2.834782Objects as identity markers – Ways of mediating the past in a South Sámi and Norse borderlandGrete Swensen0Norwegian Institute for Cultural Heritage Research (NIKU)Museums have several means of communicating with their audiences. The problems discussed here concern how local museums interact with their audience when the past they want to portray is multiple, complex and sometimes disputed. It is based on an analysis of three exhibitions in local museums situated in a region where archaeological findings indicate that the South Sámi have been present since the Late Neolithic and the Bronze Age. It highlights the various ways in which the pluralistic past in the region is being portrayed by asking whether its history appears as neutralized, i.e. transmitted in passive impartial terms, or is exoticized, repressed or mediated through other images. The one common identity marker the three exhibitions share, although portrayed in different ways and with different effects, is the gåetie, a turf hut in common use in the South Sámi region. A tendency to neutralize the multiple and complex past in the South Sámi region takes place, either by operating in a form of ‘timeless past‘ or by referring to a shared ‘far away past‘ as fishers and hunters. By barely mentioning cultural encounters, the South Sámi and the Norse are primarily presented as ethnic groups who have lived isolated and independent of each other. Key words: disputed heritage; identity markers; South Sámi; perceptions of the past; museum exhibitionshttps://journals.le.ac.uk/ojs1/index.php/mas/article/view/834
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Grete Swensen
spellingShingle Grete Swensen
Objects as identity markers – Ways of mediating the past in a South Sámi and Norse borderland
Museum & Society
author_facet Grete Swensen
author_sort Grete Swensen
title Objects as identity markers – Ways of mediating the past in a South Sámi and Norse borderland
title_short Objects as identity markers – Ways of mediating the past in a South Sámi and Norse borderland
title_full Objects as identity markers – Ways of mediating the past in a South Sámi and Norse borderland
title_fullStr Objects as identity markers – Ways of mediating the past in a South Sámi and Norse borderland
title_full_unstemmed Objects as identity markers – Ways of mediating the past in a South Sámi and Norse borderland
title_sort objects as identity markers – ways of mediating the past in a south sámi and norse borderland
publisher University of Leicester
series Museum & Society
issn 1479-8360
publishDate 2017-07-01
description Museums have several means of communicating with their audiences. The problems discussed here concern how local museums interact with their audience when the past they want to portray is multiple, complex and sometimes disputed. It is based on an analysis of three exhibitions in local museums situated in a region where archaeological findings indicate that the South Sámi have been present since the Late Neolithic and the Bronze Age. It highlights the various ways in which the pluralistic past in the region is being portrayed by asking whether its history appears as neutralized, i.e. transmitted in passive impartial terms, or is exoticized, repressed or mediated through other images. The one common identity marker the three exhibitions share, although portrayed in different ways and with different effects, is the gåetie, a turf hut in common use in the South Sámi region. A tendency to neutralize the multiple and complex past in the South Sámi region takes place, either by operating in a form of ‘timeless past‘ or by referring to a shared ‘far away past‘ as fishers and hunters. By barely mentioning cultural encounters, the South Sámi and the Norse are primarily presented as ethnic groups who have lived isolated and independent of each other. Key words: disputed heritage; identity markers; South Sámi; perceptions of the past; museum exhibitions
url https://journals.le.ac.uk/ojs1/index.php/mas/article/view/834
work_keys_str_mv AT greteswensen objectsasidentitymarkerswaysofmediatingthepastinasouthsamiandnorseborderland
_version_ 1726011321637404672