Life Cycle Environmental and Cost Performance of Prefabricated Buildings

Global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the construction industry continue to increase at an annual rate of 1.5%. It is particularly important to understand the characteristics of the building life cycle to reduce its environmental impact. This paper aims to assess the environmental impact of pre...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: He Wang, Yinqi Zhang, Weijun Gao, Soichiro Kuroki
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-03-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/7/2609
id doaj-7dd67039234e47ca9cd194ab1499d2c0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7dd67039234e47ca9cd194ab1499d2c02020-11-25T01:44:36ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502020-03-01127260910.3390/su12072609su12072609Life Cycle Environmental and Cost Performance of Prefabricated BuildingsHe Wang0Yinqi Zhang1Weijun Gao2Soichiro Kuroki3School of Environmental Engineering, the University of Kitakyushu, Kitakyushu 8080135, JapanSchool of Environmental Engineering, the University of Kitakyushu, Kitakyushu 8080135, JapanSchool of Environmental Engineering, the University of Kitakyushu, Kitakyushu 8080135, JapanSchool of Environmental Engineering, the University of Kitakyushu, Kitakyushu 8080135, JapanGlobal greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the construction industry continue to increase at an annual rate of 1.5%. It is particularly important to understand the characteristics of the building life cycle to reduce its environmental impact. This paper aims to assess the environmental impact of prefabricated buildings and traditional cast-in-situ buildings over the building life cycle using a hybrid model. A case study of a building with a 40% assembly rate in Japan was employed for evaluation. It concluded that the total energy consumption, and carbon emissions of the prefabricated building was 7.54%, and 7.17%, respectively, less than that of the traditional cast-in-situ building throughout the whole life cycle. The carbon emissions reduction in the operation phase reached a peak of 4.05 kg CO2/year∙m<sup>2</sup>. The prefabricated building was found to cost less than the traditional cast-in-situ building, reducing the price per square meter by 10.62%. The prefabricated building has advantages in terms of reducing global warming, acid rain, and health damage by 15% reduction. With the addition of the assembly rate, the carbon emissions and cost dropped, bottoming out when the assembly rate was 60%. After that, an upward trend was shown with the assembly rate increasing. Additionally, this study outlined that the prefabricated pile foundations is not applicable due to its high construction cost and environmental impact.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/7/2609prefabricated buildingtraditional buildinglife cycleenvironmental impact
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author He Wang
Yinqi Zhang
Weijun Gao
Soichiro Kuroki
spellingShingle He Wang
Yinqi Zhang
Weijun Gao
Soichiro Kuroki
Life Cycle Environmental and Cost Performance of Prefabricated Buildings
Sustainability
prefabricated building
traditional building
life cycle
environmental impact
author_facet He Wang
Yinqi Zhang
Weijun Gao
Soichiro Kuroki
author_sort He Wang
title Life Cycle Environmental and Cost Performance of Prefabricated Buildings
title_short Life Cycle Environmental and Cost Performance of Prefabricated Buildings
title_full Life Cycle Environmental and Cost Performance of Prefabricated Buildings
title_fullStr Life Cycle Environmental and Cost Performance of Prefabricated Buildings
title_full_unstemmed Life Cycle Environmental and Cost Performance of Prefabricated Buildings
title_sort life cycle environmental and cost performance of prefabricated buildings
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2020-03-01
description Global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the construction industry continue to increase at an annual rate of 1.5%. It is particularly important to understand the characteristics of the building life cycle to reduce its environmental impact. This paper aims to assess the environmental impact of prefabricated buildings and traditional cast-in-situ buildings over the building life cycle using a hybrid model. A case study of a building with a 40% assembly rate in Japan was employed for evaluation. It concluded that the total energy consumption, and carbon emissions of the prefabricated building was 7.54%, and 7.17%, respectively, less than that of the traditional cast-in-situ building throughout the whole life cycle. The carbon emissions reduction in the operation phase reached a peak of 4.05 kg CO2/year∙m<sup>2</sup>. The prefabricated building was found to cost less than the traditional cast-in-situ building, reducing the price per square meter by 10.62%. The prefabricated building has advantages in terms of reducing global warming, acid rain, and health damage by 15% reduction. With the addition of the assembly rate, the carbon emissions and cost dropped, bottoming out when the assembly rate was 60%. After that, an upward trend was shown with the assembly rate increasing. Additionally, this study outlined that the prefabricated pile foundations is not applicable due to its high construction cost and environmental impact.
topic prefabricated building
traditional building
life cycle
environmental impact
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/7/2609
work_keys_str_mv AT hewang lifecycleenvironmentalandcostperformanceofprefabricatedbuildings
AT yinqizhang lifecycleenvironmentalandcostperformanceofprefabricatedbuildings
AT weijungao lifecycleenvironmentalandcostperformanceofprefabricatedbuildings
AT soichirokuroki lifecycleenvironmentalandcostperformanceofprefabricatedbuildings
_version_ 1725027618692005888