Agro-Economic Evaluation of Alternative Crop Management Options for Teff Production in the Northwestern Highlands of Ethiopia
Teff is an important crop for smallholder farmers in Ethiopia. Improved crop management practices are needed to increase teff productivity and decrease production costs. Here, we used a split–split plot design to evaluate the impacts of different tillage, sowing, and soil compaction practices, and t...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-03-01
|
Series: | Agriculture |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/4/298 |
id |
doaj-7e24a2754ff74709b862dd372cb14257 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-7e24a2754ff74709b862dd372cb142572021-03-30T23:06:04ZengMDPI AGAgriculture2077-04722021-03-011129829810.3390/agriculture11040298Agro-Economic Evaluation of Alternative Crop Management Options for Teff Production in the Northwestern Highlands of EthiopiaFekremariam Asargew Mihretie0Atsushi Tsunekawa1Nigussie Haregeweyn2Enyew Adgo3Mitsuru Tsubo4Tsugiyuki Masunaga5Derege Tsegaye Meshesha6Kindiye Ebabu7Muluken Bayable8United Graduate School of Agricultural Sciences, Tottori University, 4-101 Koyama-Minami, Tottori 680-8553, JapanArid Land Research Center, Tottori University, 1390 Hamasaka, Tottori 680-0001, JapanInternational Platform for Dryland Research and Education, Tottori University, 1390 Hamasaka, Tottori 680-0001, JapanCollege of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar P.O. Box 1289, EthiopiaArid Land Research Center, Tottori University, 1390 Hamasaka, Tottori 680-0001, JapanFaculty of Life and Environmental Science, Shimane University, Shimane 690-8504, JapanCollege of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar P.O. Box 1289, EthiopiaArid Land Research Center, Tottori University, 1390 Hamasaka, Tottori 680-0001, JapanUnited Graduate School of Agricultural Sciences, Tottori University, 4-101 Koyama-Minami, Tottori 680-8553, JapanTeff is an important crop for smallholder farmers in Ethiopia. Improved crop management practices are needed to increase teff productivity and decrease production costs. Here, we used a split–split plot design to evaluate the impacts of different tillage, sowing, and soil compaction practices, and their combinations, on agronomic performance, weed population, lodging, and cost in teff production in the northwestern highlands of Ethiopia in 2018–2020. Reduced tillage (RT) improved soil moisture, resulting in increased agronomic performance and decreased production costs compared with conventional tillage (CT); however, the weed population was substantially larger with RT than with CT. Row planting (RP) reduced seed cost and lodging but increased sowing and weeding costs compared with broadcast planting (BP). Plant population and leaf area index were substantially greater with BP than with RP during early-stage growth, but this reversed during late-stage growth. Despite labor costs being significantly greater with (WC) compaction than without (NC), little to no differences were observed in the weed population or in agronomic performance. Partial cost–benefit analysis revealed that RT–RP–WC followed by RT–RP–NC was the most economical treatment combination, suggesting that RT–RP–NC could be a labor-effective means of increasing teff production by smallholder farms in Ethiopia.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/4/298compactiondroughtreduced tillagerow plantingsoil moisture |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Fekremariam Asargew Mihretie Atsushi Tsunekawa Nigussie Haregeweyn Enyew Adgo Mitsuru Tsubo Tsugiyuki Masunaga Derege Tsegaye Meshesha Kindiye Ebabu Muluken Bayable |
spellingShingle |
Fekremariam Asargew Mihretie Atsushi Tsunekawa Nigussie Haregeweyn Enyew Adgo Mitsuru Tsubo Tsugiyuki Masunaga Derege Tsegaye Meshesha Kindiye Ebabu Muluken Bayable Agro-Economic Evaluation of Alternative Crop Management Options for Teff Production in the Northwestern Highlands of Ethiopia Agriculture compaction drought reduced tillage row planting soil moisture |
author_facet |
Fekremariam Asargew Mihretie Atsushi Tsunekawa Nigussie Haregeweyn Enyew Adgo Mitsuru Tsubo Tsugiyuki Masunaga Derege Tsegaye Meshesha Kindiye Ebabu Muluken Bayable |
author_sort |
Fekremariam Asargew Mihretie |
title |
Agro-Economic Evaluation of Alternative Crop Management Options for Teff Production in the Northwestern Highlands of Ethiopia |
title_short |
Agro-Economic Evaluation of Alternative Crop Management Options for Teff Production in the Northwestern Highlands of Ethiopia |
title_full |
Agro-Economic Evaluation of Alternative Crop Management Options for Teff Production in the Northwestern Highlands of Ethiopia |
title_fullStr |
Agro-Economic Evaluation of Alternative Crop Management Options for Teff Production in the Northwestern Highlands of Ethiopia |
title_full_unstemmed |
Agro-Economic Evaluation of Alternative Crop Management Options for Teff Production in the Northwestern Highlands of Ethiopia |
title_sort |
agro-economic evaluation of alternative crop management options for teff production in the northwestern highlands of ethiopia |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Agriculture |
issn |
2077-0472 |
publishDate |
2021-03-01 |
description |
Teff is an important crop for smallholder farmers in Ethiopia. Improved crop management practices are needed to increase teff productivity and decrease production costs. Here, we used a split–split plot design to evaluate the impacts of different tillage, sowing, and soil compaction practices, and their combinations, on agronomic performance, weed population, lodging, and cost in teff production in the northwestern highlands of Ethiopia in 2018–2020. Reduced tillage (RT) improved soil moisture, resulting in increased agronomic performance and decreased production costs compared with conventional tillage (CT); however, the weed population was substantially larger with RT than with CT. Row planting (RP) reduced seed cost and lodging but increased sowing and weeding costs compared with broadcast planting (BP). Plant population and leaf area index were substantially greater with BP than with RP during early-stage growth, but this reversed during late-stage growth. Despite labor costs being significantly greater with (WC) compaction than without (NC), little to no differences were observed in the weed population or in agronomic performance. Partial cost–benefit analysis revealed that RT–RP–WC followed by RT–RP–NC was the most economical treatment combination, suggesting that RT–RP–NC could be a labor-effective means of increasing teff production by smallholder farms in Ethiopia. |
topic |
compaction drought reduced tillage row planting soil moisture |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/4/298 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT fekremariamasargewmihretie agroeconomicevaluationofalternativecropmanagementoptionsforteffproductioninthenorthwesternhighlandsofethiopia AT atsushitsunekawa agroeconomicevaluationofalternativecropmanagementoptionsforteffproductioninthenorthwesternhighlandsofethiopia AT nigussieharegeweyn agroeconomicevaluationofalternativecropmanagementoptionsforteffproductioninthenorthwesternhighlandsofethiopia AT enyewadgo agroeconomicevaluationofalternativecropmanagementoptionsforteffproductioninthenorthwesternhighlandsofethiopia AT mitsurutsubo agroeconomicevaluationofalternativecropmanagementoptionsforteffproductioninthenorthwesternhighlandsofethiopia AT tsugiyukimasunaga agroeconomicevaluationofalternativecropmanagementoptionsforteffproductioninthenorthwesternhighlandsofethiopia AT deregetsegayemeshesha agroeconomicevaluationofalternativecropmanagementoptionsforteffproductioninthenorthwesternhighlandsofethiopia AT kindiyeebabu agroeconomicevaluationofalternativecropmanagementoptionsforteffproductioninthenorthwesternhighlandsofethiopia AT mulukenbayable agroeconomicevaluationofalternativecropmanagementoptionsforteffproductioninthenorthwesternhighlandsofethiopia |
_version_ |
1724178731756421120 |