Agro-Economic Evaluation of Alternative Crop Management Options for Teff Production in the Northwestern Highlands of Ethiopia

Teff is an important crop for smallholder farmers in Ethiopia. Improved crop management practices are needed to increase teff productivity and decrease production costs. Here, we used a split–split plot design to evaluate the impacts of different tillage, sowing, and soil compaction practices, and t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fekremariam Asargew Mihretie, Atsushi Tsunekawa, Nigussie Haregeweyn, Enyew Adgo, Mitsuru Tsubo, Tsugiyuki Masunaga, Derege Tsegaye Meshesha, Kindiye Ebabu, Muluken Bayable
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-03-01
Series:Agriculture
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/4/298
id doaj-7e24a2754ff74709b862dd372cb14257
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7e24a2754ff74709b862dd372cb142572021-03-30T23:06:04ZengMDPI AGAgriculture2077-04722021-03-011129829810.3390/agriculture11040298Agro-Economic Evaluation of Alternative Crop Management Options for Teff Production in the Northwestern Highlands of EthiopiaFekremariam Asargew Mihretie0Atsushi Tsunekawa1Nigussie Haregeweyn2Enyew Adgo3Mitsuru Tsubo4Tsugiyuki Masunaga5Derege Tsegaye Meshesha6Kindiye Ebabu7Muluken Bayable8United Graduate School of Agricultural Sciences, Tottori University, 4-101 Koyama-Minami, Tottori 680-8553, JapanArid Land Research Center, Tottori University, 1390 Hamasaka, Tottori 680-0001, JapanInternational Platform for Dryland Research and Education, Tottori University, 1390 Hamasaka, Tottori 680-0001, JapanCollege of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar P.O. Box 1289, EthiopiaArid Land Research Center, Tottori University, 1390 Hamasaka, Tottori 680-0001, JapanFaculty of Life and Environmental Science, Shimane University, Shimane 690-8504, JapanCollege of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar P.O. Box 1289, EthiopiaArid Land Research Center, Tottori University, 1390 Hamasaka, Tottori 680-0001, JapanUnited Graduate School of Agricultural Sciences, Tottori University, 4-101 Koyama-Minami, Tottori 680-8553, JapanTeff is an important crop for smallholder farmers in Ethiopia. Improved crop management practices are needed to increase teff productivity and decrease production costs. Here, we used a split–split plot design to evaluate the impacts of different tillage, sowing, and soil compaction practices, and their combinations, on agronomic performance, weed population, lodging, and cost in teff production in the northwestern highlands of Ethiopia in 2018–2020. Reduced tillage (RT) improved soil moisture, resulting in increased agronomic performance and decreased production costs compared with conventional tillage (CT); however, the weed population was substantially larger with RT than with CT. Row planting (RP) reduced seed cost and lodging but increased sowing and weeding costs compared with broadcast planting (BP). Plant population and leaf area index were substantially greater with BP than with RP during early-stage growth, but this reversed during late-stage growth. Despite labor costs being significantly greater with (WC) compaction than without (NC), little to no differences were observed in the weed population or in agronomic performance. Partial cost–benefit analysis revealed that RT–RP–WC followed by RT–RP–NC was the most economical treatment combination, suggesting that RT–RP–NC could be a labor-effective means of increasing teff production by smallholder farms in Ethiopia.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/4/298compactiondroughtreduced tillagerow plantingsoil moisture
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Fekremariam Asargew Mihretie
Atsushi Tsunekawa
Nigussie Haregeweyn
Enyew Adgo
Mitsuru Tsubo
Tsugiyuki Masunaga
Derege Tsegaye Meshesha
Kindiye Ebabu
Muluken Bayable
spellingShingle Fekremariam Asargew Mihretie
Atsushi Tsunekawa
Nigussie Haregeweyn
Enyew Adgo
Mitsuru Tsubo
Tsugiyuki Masunaga
Derege Tsegaye Meshesha
Kindiye Ebabu
Muluken Bayable
Agro-Economic Evaluation of Alternative Crop Management Options for Teff Production in the Northwestern Highlands of Ethiopia
Agriculture
compaction
drought
reduced tillage
row planting
soil moisture
author_facet Fekremariam Asargew Mihretie
Atsushi Tsunekawa
Nigussie Haregeweyn
Enyew Adgo
Mitsuru Tsubo
Tsugiyuki Masunaga
Derege Tsegaye Meshesha
Kindiye Ebabu
Muluken Bayable
author_sort Fekremariam Asargew Mihretie
title Agro-Economic Evaluation of Alternative Crop Management Options for Teff Production in the Northwestern Highlands of Ethiopia
title_short Agro-Economic Evaluation of Alternative Crop Management Options for Teff Production in the Northwestern Highlands of Ethiopia
title_full Agro-Economic Evaluation of Alternative Crop Management Options for Teff Production in the Northwestern Highlands of Ethiopia
title_fullStr Agro-Economic Evaluation of Alternative Crop Management Options for Teff Production in the Northwestern Highlands of Ethiopia
title_full_unstemmed Agro-Economic Evaluation of Alternative Crop Management Options for Teff Production in the Northwestern Highlands of Ethiopia
title_sort agro-economic evaluation of alternative crop management options for teff production in the northwestern highlands of ethiopia
publisher MDPI AG
series Agriculture
issn 2077-0472
publishDate 2021-03-01
description Teff is an important crop for smallholder farmers in Ethiopia. Improved crop management practices are needed to increase teff productivity and decrease production costs. Here, we used a split–split plot design to evaluate the impacts of different tillage, sowing, and soil compaction practices, and their combinations, on agronomic performance, weed population, lodging, and cost in teff production in the northwestern highlands of Ethiopia in 2018–2020. Reduced tillage (RT) improved soil moisture, resulting in increased agronomic performance and decreased production costs compared with conventional tillage (CT); however, the weed population was substantially larger with RT than with CT. Row planting (RP) reduced seed cost and lodging but increased sowing and weeding costs compared with broadcast planting (BP). Plant population and leaf area index were substantially greater with BP than with RP during early-stage growth, but this reversed during late-stage growth. Despite labor costs being significantly greater with (WC) compaction than without (NC), little to no differences were observed in the weed population or in agronomic performance. Partial cost–benefit analysis revealed that RT–RP–WC followed by RT–RP–NC was the most economical treatment combination, suggesting that RT–RP–NC could be a labor-effective means of increasing teff production by smallholder farms in Ethiopia.
topic compaction
drought
reduced tillage
row planting
soil moisture
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/4/298
work_keys_str_mv AT fekremariamasargewmihretie agroeconomicevaluationofalternativecropmanagementoptionsforteffproductioninthenorthwesternhighlandsofethiopia
AT atsushitsunekawa agroeconomicevaluationofalternativecropmanagementoptionsforteffproductioninthenorthwesternhighlandsofethiopia
AT nigussieharegeweyn agroeconomicevaluationofalternativecropmanagementoptionsforteffproductioninthenorthwesternhighlandsofethiopia
AT enyewadgo agroeconomicevaluationofalternativecropmanagementoptionsforteffproductioninthenorthwesternhighlandsofethiopia
AT mitsurutsubo agroeconomicevaluationofalternativecropmanagementoptionsforteffproductioninthenorthwesternhighlandsofethiopia
AT tsugiyukimasunaga agroeconomicevaluationofalternativecropmanagementoptionsforteffproductioninthenorthwesternhighlandsofethiopia
AT deregetsegayemeshesha agroeconomicevaluationofalternativecropmanagementoptionsforteffproductioninthenorthwesternhighlandsofethiopia
AT kindiyeebabu agroeconomicevaluationofalternativecropmanagementoptionsforteffproductioninthenorthwesternhighlandsofethiopia
AT mulukenbayable agroeconomicevaluationofalternativecropmanagementoptionsforteffproductioninthenorthwesternhighlandsofethiopia
_version_ 1724178731756421120