Efficacy of Ethyl Chloride Spray versus Subcutaneous 1% Lidocaine Injection for Relieving the Pain of One-rod Contraceptive Implant Removal: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial

Objectives: To evaluate the pain scores between using ethyl chloride spray and subcutaneous 1% lidocaine injection for relieving the pain from one-rod contraceptive implant removal.Materials and Methods: A total of 120 women who intended to remove the one-rod contraceptive implant were randomly ass...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nartlada Mapaisankit, Pitch Chandeying, Sasikan Tangthasana
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Royal Thai College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists 2021-03-01
Series:Thai Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/tjog/article/download/216402/169573/
id doaj-7e60222ff6ba468c9d26a04c45d7381d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7e60222ff6ba468c9d26a04c45d7381d2021-04-08T05:06:47ZengThe Royal Thai College of Obstetricians and GynaecologistsThai Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology0857-60842021-03-012928291https://doi.org/10.14456/tjog.2021.11Efficacy of Ethyl Chloride Spray versus Subcutaneous 1% Lidocaine Injection for Relieving the Pain of One-rod Contraceptive Implant Removal: A single-blinded randomized controlled trialNartlada Mapaisankit0Pitch Chandeying1Sasikan Tangthasana2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Charoenkrung Pracharak Hospital, Medical Service Department, Bangkok Metropolitan Administration, Bangkok, ThailandDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Charoenkrung Pracharak Hospital, Medical Service Department, Bangkok Metropolitan Administration, Bangkok, ThailandDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Charoenkrung Pracharak Hospital, Medical Service Department, Bangkok Metropolitan Administration, Bangkok, ThailandObjectives: To evaluate the pain scores between using ethyl chloride spray and subcutaneous 1% lidocaine injection for relieving the pain from one-rod contraceptive implant removal.Materials and Methods: A total of 120 women who intended to remove the one-rod contraceptive implant were randomly assigned to receive ethyl chloride spray or 1% lidocaine injection before the procedure. Clinical characteristics including depth of implant, were collected. Pain during anesthetic administration, implant removal, and overall pain were evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS). Participant and procedure assistant satisfaction were assessed. The outcome evaluator was blinded from the anesthetic method.Results: All patient characteristics were similar between two groups. Pain during anesthetic administration and overall pain in the ethyl chloride spray group was significantly lower than the lidocaine group (median VAS 0 and 3; p < 0.001 and median VAS 1 and 2.9; p < 0.001, respectively). However, pain during the procedure in the ethyl chloride spray group was found to be significantly higher compared to the lidocaine group (median VAS 1 and 0; p = 0.001). Implant removal duration in the ethyl chloride spray group was significantly shorter than the lidocaine group. Participant and procedure assistant satisfaction in the ethyl chloride spray group was significantly higher than the lidocaine group.Conclusion: Using ethyl chloride spray was effective for relieving the pain during anesthetic administration and overall pain of one-rod contraceptive implant removal. But it was associated with higher pain score during the procedure.https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/tjog/article/download/216402/169573/ethyl chloride spraylidocainecontraceptive implantimplant removalpain
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nartlada Mapaisankit
Pitch Chandeying
Sasikan Tangthasana
spellingShingle Nartlada Mapaisankit
Pitch Chandeying
Sasikan Tangthasana
Efficacy of Ethyl Chloride Spray versus Subcutaneous 1% Lidocaine Injection for Relieving the Pain of One-rod Contraceptive Implant Removal: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial
Thai Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
ethyl chloride spray
lidocaine
contraceptive implant
implant removal
pain
author_facet Nartlada Mapaisankit
Pitch Chandeying
Sasikan Tangthasana
author_sort Nartlada Mapaisankit
title Efficacy of Ethyl Chloride Spray versus Subcutaneous 1% Lidocaine Injection for Relieving the Pain of One-rod Contraceptive Implant Removal: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial
title_short Efficacy of Ethyl Chloride Spray versus Subcutaneous 1% Lidocaine Injection for Relieving the Pain of One-rod Contraceptive Implant Removal: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial
title_full Efficacy of Ethyl Chloride Spray versus Subcutaneous 1% Lidocaine Injection for Relieving the Pain of One-rod Contraceptive Implant Removal: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Efficacy of Ethyl Chloride Spray versus Subcutaneous 1% Lidocaine Injection for Relieving the Pain of One-rod Contraceptive Implant Removal: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of Ethyl Chloride Spray versus Subcutaneous 1% Lidocaine Injection for Relieving the Pain of One-rod Contraceptive Implant Removal: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial
title_sort efficacy of ethyl chloride spray versus subcutaneous 1% lidocaine injection for relieving the pain of one-rod contraceptive implant removal: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial
publisher The Royal Thai College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists
series Thai Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
issn 0857-6084
publishDate 2021-03-01
description Objectives: To evaluate the pain scores between using ethyl chloride spray and subcutaneous 1% lidocaine injection for relieving the pain from one-rod contraceptive implant removal.Materials and Methods: A total of 120 women who intended to remove the one-rod contraceptive implant were randomly assigned to receive ethyl chloride spray or 1% lidocaine injection before the procedure. Clinical characteristics including depth of implant, were collected. Pain during anesthetic administration, implant removal, and overall pain were evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS). Participant and procedure assistant satisfaction were assessed. The outcome evaluator was blinded from the anesthetic method.Results: All patient characteristics were similar between two groups. Pain during anesthetic administration and overall pain in the ethyl chloride spray group was significantly lower than the lidocaine group (median VAS 0 and 3; p < 0.001 and median VAS 1 and 2.9; p < 0.001, respectively). However, pain during the procedure in the ethyl chloride spray group was found to be significantly higher compared to the lidocaine group (median VAS 1 and 0; p = 0.001). Implant removal duration in the ethyl chloride spray group was significantly shorter than the lidocaine group. Participant and procedure assistant satisfaction in the ethyl chloride spray group was significantly higher than the lidocaine group.Conclusion: Using ethyl chloride spray was effective for relieving the pain during anesthetic administration and overall pain of one-rod contraceptive implant removal. But it was associated with higher pain score during the procedure.
topic ethyl chloride spray
lidocaine
contraceptive implant
implant removal
pain
url https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/tjog/article/download/216402/169573/
work_keys_str_mv AT nartladamapaisankit efficacyofethylchloridesprayversussubcutaneous1lidocaineinjectionforrelievingthepainofonerodcontraceptiveimplantremovalasingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pitchchandeying efficacyofethylchloridesprayversussubcutaneous1lidocaineinjectionforrelievingthepainofonerodcontraceptiveimplantremovalasingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sasikantangthasana efficacyofethylchloridesprayversussubcutaneous1lidocaineinjectionforrelievingthepainofonerodcontraceptiveimplantremovalasingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
_version_ 1721535399387463680