Evaluating Relative Retention of Polar Stationary Phases in Hydrophilic Interaction Chromatography

A large number of polar stationary phases with diverse chemistry have been developed for various applications in hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC). However, column manufacturers employ different testing procedures to evaluate retention of the polar stationary phases. This renders the re...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yong Guo, Nidhi Bhalodia, Bassel Fattal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-08-01
Series:Separations
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2297-8739/6/3/42
id doaj-7e9340e9f7c64c7cb00183aa1c41e599
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7e9340e9f7c64c7cb00183aa1c41e5992020-11-25T01:35:11ZengMDPI AGSeparations2297-87392019-08-01634210.3390/separations6030042separations6030042Evaluating Relative Retention of Polar Stationary Phases in Hydrophilic Interaction ChromatographyYong Guo0Nidhi Bhalodia1Bassel Fattal2School of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Fairleigh Dickinson University, Florham Park, NJ 07932, USASchool of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Fairleigh Dickinson University, Florham Park, NJ 07932, USASchool of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Fairleigh Dickinson University, Florham Park, NJ 07932, USAA large number of polar stationary phases with diverse chemistry have been developed for various applications in hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC). However, column manufacturers employ different testing procedures to evaluate retention of the polar stationary phases. This renders the retention data impossible for comparison and makes it difficult for the users to select the right stationary phase based on retention. We have evaluated 25 polar stationary phases using cytosine and uracil as the model compounds in various mobile phase conditions. These stationary phases show a wide range of retention characteristics for the model compounds. The ranking of the stationary phases does not change drastically with the acetonitrile level in the mobile phase.https://www.mdpi.com/2297-8739/6/3/42stationary phaseretentioncytosine
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yong Guo
Nidhi Bhalodia
Bassel Fattal
spellingShingle Yong Guo
Nidhi Bhalodia
Bassel Fattal
Evaluating Relative Retention of Polar Stationary Phases in Hydrophilic Interaction Chromatography
Separations
stationary phase
retention
cytosine
author_facet Yong Guo
Nidhi Bhalodia
Bassel Fattal
author_sort Yong Guo
title Evaluating Relative Retention of Polar Stationary Phases in Hydrophilic Interaction Chromatography
title_short Evaluating Relative Retention of Polar Stationary Phases in Hydrophilic Interaction Chromatography
title_full Evaluating Relative Retention of Polar Stationary Phases in Hydrophilic Interaction Chromatography
title_fullStr Evaluating Relative Retention of Polar Stationary Phases in Hydrophilic Interaction Chromatography
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating Relative Retention of Polar Stationary Phases in Hydrophilic Interaction Chromatography
title_sort evaluating relative retention of polar stationary phases in hydrophilic interaction chromatography
publisher MDPI AG
series Separations
issn 2297-8739
publishDate 2019-08-01
description A large number of polar stationary phases with diverse chemistry have been developed for various applications in hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC). However, column manufacturers employ different testing procedures to evaluate retention of the polar stationary phases. This renders the retention data impossible for comparison and makes it difficult for the users to select the right stationary phase based on retention. We have evaluated 25 polar stationary phases using cytosine and uracil as the model compounds in various mobile phase conditions. These stationary phases show a wide range of retention characteristics for the model compounds. The ranking of the stationary phases does not change drastically with the acetonitrile level in the mobile phase.
topic stationary phase
retention
cytosine
url https://www.mdpi.com/2297-8739/6/3/42
work_keys_str_mv AT yongguo evaluatingrelativeretentionofpolarstationaryphasesinhydrophilicinteractionchromatography
AT nidhibhalodia evaluatingrelativeretentionofpolarstationaryphasesinhydrophilicinteractionchromatography
AT basselfattal evaluatingrelativeretentionofpolarstationaryphasesinhydrophilicinteractionchromatography
_version_ 1725067984914874368