A Comparison of Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty versus Dynamic Hip Screw Fixation of Basicervical Femoral Neck Fractures

  Background: Surgical treatment of basicervical femoral neck fractures, which is biomechanically similar to intertrochanteric fractures, is an internal fixation by DHS and anti-rotation screw. Since devise failure is one of the most noticeable complications of these surgical procedures, this stud...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ali Mousapour, Keykhosro Mardanpour, Adel hojabrian, Morteza Saeb, Seyyd Saeed Khabiri, Roya Safari-Faramani, Monireh Yaghoubi, Sepehr Rahimipour, Alireza Shafiee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2020-07-01
Series:Journal of Orthopedic and Spine Trauma
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jost.tums.ac.ir/index.php/jost/article/view/162
id doaj-7ea3c9e6079d423b9065e33c1576220f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7ea3c9e6079d423b9065e33c1576220f2021-07-28T07:05:58ZengTehran University of Medical SciencesJournal of Orthopedic and Spine Trauma2538-23302538-46002020-07-015110.18502/jost.v5i1.3321A Comparison of Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty versus Dynamic Hip Screw Fixation of Basicervical Femoral Neck FracturesAli Mousapour0Keykhosro Mardanpour1Adel hojabrian2Morteza Saeb3Seyyd Saeed Khabiri4Roya Safari-Faramani5Monireh Yaghoubi6Sepehr Rahimipour7Alireza Shafiee8Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, IranAssociate Professor, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, IranSenior Resident, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, IranAssociate Professor, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, IranAssistant Professor, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, IranAssistant Professor, Department of Epidemiology, Research Center for Environmental Determinants of Health, School of Health, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, IranSenior Resident, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, IranSenior Resident, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, IranSenior Resident, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran  Background: Surgical treatment of basicervical femoral neck fractures, which is biomechanically similar to intertrochanteric fractures, is an internal fixation by DHS and anti-rotation screw. Since devise failure is one of the most noticeable complications of these surgical procedures, this study aimed to compare the bipolar Hemi-arthroplasty with DHS plate internal fixation in elderly patients with a basicervical femoral neck fracture. Methods: This is a randomized controlled clinical trial in which 60 patients with femoral neck fractures were divided into two groups of 30 control (DHS fixation) and intervention (Bipolar hemiarthroplasty) randomly. Functional evaluation was completed by the HHS questionnaire and VAS scale for pain assessment, postoperative complications at 6 months and one year postoperatively. Data were analyzed using Stata software. Findings: The overall mean age in the control group was 73.95± 9.85 and in the intervention group 74.22±7.85 years. Three patients in the intervention group and 6 patients in the control group were excluded. HHS in Sixth months and one year after surgery were significantly higher in the bipolar group compared to the DHS group(p-value<0.0003and p-value < 0.0097). there were no significant differences in VAS between the two groups (p-value<0.4557 and p-value < 0.4578).The rate of device failure in the control group was 2 cases. Conclusion: Overall, the results of this study show that bipolar hemiarthroplasty surgery is more effective than internal fixation by DHS plate in improving the patients' quality of life based on the HHS scores, and the lower failure rate as well as diminishing of the reoperation rate.https://jost.tums.ac.ir/index.php/jost/article/view/162Femoral Neck Fractures; Hemiarthroplasty; Fracture Fixation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ali Mousapour
Keykhosro Mardanpour
Adel hojabrian
Morteza Saeb
Seyyd Saeed Khabiri
Roya Safari-Faramani
Monireh Yaghoubi
Sepehr Rahimipour
Alireza Shafiee
spellingShingle Ali Mousapour
Keykhosro Mardanpour
Adel hojabrian
Morteza Saeb
Seyyd Saeed Khabiri
Roya Safari-Faramani
Monireh Yaghoubi
Sepehr Rahimipour
Alireza Shafiee
A Comparison of Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty versus Dynamic Hip Screw Fixation of Basicervical Femoral Neck Fractures
Journal of Orthopedic and Spine Trauma
Femoral Neck Fractures; Hemiarthroplasty; Fracture Fixation
author_facet Ali Mousapour
Keykhosro Mardanpour
Adel hojabrian
Morteza Saeb
Seyyd Saeed Khabiri
Roya Safari-Faramani
Monireh Yaghoubi
Sepehr Rahimipour
Alireza Shafiee
author_sort Ali Mousapour
title A Comparison of Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty versus Dynamic Hip Screw Fixation of Basicervical Femoral Neck Fractures
title_short A Comparison of Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty versus Dynamic Hip Screw Fixation of Basicervical Femoral Neck Fractures
title_full A Comparison of Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty versus Dynamic Hip Screw Fixation of Basicervical Femoral Neck Fractures
title_fullStr A Comparison of Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty versus Dynamic Hip Screw Fixation of Basicervical Femoral Neck Fractures
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty versus Dynamic Hip Screw Fixation of Basicervical Femoral Neck Fractures
title_sort comparison of bipolar hemiarthroplasty versus dynamic hip screw fixation of basicervical femoral neck fractures
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
series Journal of Orthopedic and Spine Trauma
issn 2538-2330
2538-4600
publishDate 2020-07-01
description   Background: Surgical treatment of basicervical femoral neck fractures, which is biomechanically similar to intertrochanteric fractures, is an internal fixation by DHS and anti-rotation screw. Since devise failure is one of the most noticeable complications of these surgical procedures, this study aimed to compare the bipolar Hemi-arthroplasty with DHS plate internal fixation in elderly patients with a basicervical femoral neck fracture. Methods: This is a randomized controlled clinical trial in which 60 patients with femoral neck fractures were divided into two groups of 30 control (DHS fixation) and intervention (Bipolar hemiarthroplasty) randomly. Functional evaluation was completed by the HHS questionnaire and VAS scale for pain assessment, postoperative complications at 6 months and one year postoperatively. Data were analyzed using Stata software. Findings: The overall mean age in the control group was 73.95± 9.85 and in the intervention group 74.22±7.85 years. Three patients in the intervention group and 6 patients in the control group were excluded. HHS in Sixth months and one year after surgery were significantly higher in the bipolar group compared to the DHS group(p-value<0.0003and p-value < 0.0097). there were no significant differences in VAS between the two groups (p-value<0.4557 and p-value < 0.4578).The rate of device failure in the control group was 2 cases. Conclusion: Overall, the results of this study show that bipolar hemiarthroplasty surgery is more effective than internal fixation by DHS plate in improving the patients' quality of life based on the HHS scores, and the lower failure rate as well as diminishing of the reoperation rate.
topic Femoral Neck Fractures; Hemiarthroplasty; Fracture Fixation
url https://jost.tums.ac.ir/index.php/jost/article/view/162
work_keys_str_mv AT alimousapour acomparisonofbipolarhemiarthroplastyversusdynamichipscrewfixationofbasicervicalfemoralneckfractures
AT keykhosromardanpour acomparisonofbipolarhemiarthroplastyversusdynamichipscrewfixationofbasicervicalfemoralneckfractures
AT adelhojabrian acomparisonofbipolarhemiarthroplastyversusdynamichipscrewfixationofbasicervicalfemoralneckfractures
AT mortezasaeb acomparisonofbipolarhemiarthroplastyversusdynamichipscrewfixationofbasicervicalfemoralneckfractures
AT seyydsaeedkhabiri acomparisonofbipolarhemiarthroplastyversusdynamichipscrewfixationofbasicervicalfemoralneckfractures
AT royasafarifaramani acomparisonofbipolarhemiarthroplastyversusdynamichipscrewfixationofbasicervicalfemoralneckfractures
AT monirehyaghoubi acomparisonofbipolarhemiarthroplastyversusdynamichipscrewfixationofbasicervicalfemoralneckfractures
AT sepehrrahimipour acomparisonofbipolarhemiarthroplastyversusdynamichipscrewfixationofbasicervicalfemoralneckfractures
AT alirezashafiee acomparisonofbipolarhemiarthroplastyversusdynamichipscrewfixationofbasicervicalfemoralneckfractures
AT alimousapour comparisonofbipolarhemiarthroplastyversusdynamichipscrewfixationofbasicervicalfemoralneckfractures
AT keykhosromardanpour comparisonofbipolarhemiarthroplastyversusdynamichipscrewfixationofbasicervicalfemoralneckfractures
AT adelhojabrian comparisonofbipolarhemiarthroplastyversusdynamichipscrewfixationofbasicervicalfemoralneckfractures
AT mortezasaeb comparisonofbipolarhemiarthroplastyversusdynamichipscrewfixationofbasicervicalfemoralneckfractures
AT seyydsaeedkhabiri comparisonofbipolarhemiarthroplastyversusdynamichipscrewfixationofbasicervicalfemoralneckfractures
AT royasafarifaramani comparisonofbipolarhemiarthroplastyversusdynamichipscrewfixationofbasicervicalfemoralneckfractures
AT monirehyaghoubi comparisonofbipolarhemiarthroplastyversusdynamichipscrewfixationofbasicervicalfemoralneckfractures
AT sepehrrahimipour comparisonofbipolarhemiarthroplastyversusdynamichipscrewfixationofbasicervicalfemoralneckfractures
AT alirezashafiee comparisonofbipolarhemiarthroplastyversusdynamichipscrewfixationofbasicervicalfemoralneckfractures
_version_ 1721279041120501760