N‐terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide eliminates the prognostic effect of atrial fibrillation in patients with chronic heart failure

Abstract Aims Co‐morbid atrial fibrillation (AF) increases both mortality and N‐terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide (NT‐proBNP) concentrations in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). It is unclear whether AF worsens prognosis independently from NT‐proBNP concentrations. If AF was an indepen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Johannes Schnorbach, Hanna Fröhlich, Tobias Täger, Anna Corletto, Hugo A. Katus, Lutz Frankenstein
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-08-01
Series:ESC Heart Failure
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12464
id doaj-7ead7e26785a4e2988705952dd4ee8cc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7ead7e26785a4e2988705952dd4ee8cc2020-11-25T01:44:05ZengWileyESC Heart Failure2055-58222019-08-016464064810.1002/ehf2.12464N‐terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide eliminates the prognostic effect of atrial fibrillation in patients with chronic heart failureJohannes Schnorbach0Hanna Fröhlich1Tobias Täger2Anna Corletto3Hugo A. Katus4Lutz Frankenstein5Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Pulmonology University of Heidelberg Im Neuenheimer Feld 410 69120 Heidelberg GermanyDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Pulmonology University of Heidelberg Im Neuenheimer Feld 410 69120 Heidelberg GermanyDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Pulmonology University of Heidelberg Im Neuenheimer Feld 410 69120 Heidelberg GermanyDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Pulmonology University of Heidelberg Im Neuenheimer Feld 410 69120 Heidelberg GermanyDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Pulmonology University of Heidelberg Im Neuenheimer Feld 410 69120 Heidelberg GermanyDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Pulmonology University of Heidelberg Im Neuenheimer Feld 410 69120 Heidelberg GermanyAbstract Aims Co‐morbid atrial fibrillation (AF) increases both mortality and N‐terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide (NT‐proBNP) concentrations in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). It is unclear whether AF worsens prognosis independently from NT‐proBNP concentrations. If AF was an independent risk factor, NT‐proBNP levels for outcome prediction would need to be adjusted in patients with AF. We aimed to analyse the influence of AF on the prognostic value of NT‐proBNP in patients with CHF. Methods and results A total of 2541 consecutive CHF patients with sinus rhythm (SR) or AF were identified in the outpatients' CHF registry of the University of Heidelberg, Germany. Of these, 250 patients with SR were individually matched to 250 patients with AF with respect to NT‐proBNP, New York Heart Association functional class, sex, age, and aetiology of CHF. In the general sample, both AF and NT‐proBNP were associated with all‐cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.61–2.39, P < 0.001; and HR = 1.03 per 1000 ng/L increase, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.04, P < 0.001, respectively]. After matching, NT‐proBNP retained its prognostic power (HR = 1.13 per 1000 ng/L increase, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.16, P < 0.001), but AF did not (HR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.25, P = 0.56). Despite similar prognosis, matched patients with SR were in more advanced CHF than were AF patients as indicated by a lower left ventricular ejection fraction (30 ± 13% vs. 34 ± 14%, P < 0.001). Conclusions The prognostic value of NT‐proBNP in CHF is not influenced by concomitant AF. AF, in return, might be a surrogate of a worse cardiac condition rather than an independent risk factor.https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12464Chronic heart failureAtrial fibrillationNT‐proBNPPrognosis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Johannes Schnorbach
Hanna Fröhlich
Tobias Täger
Anna Corletto
Hugo A. Katus
Lutz Frankenstein
spellingShingle Johannes Schnorbach
Hanna Fröhlich
Tobias Täger
Anna Corletto
Hugo A. Katus
Lutz Frankenstein
N‐terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide eliminates the prognostic effect of atrial fibrillation in patients with chronic heart failure
ESC Heart Failure
Chronic heart failure
Atrial fibrillation
NT‐proBNP
Prognosis
author_facet Johannes Schnorbach
Hanna Fröhlich
Tobias Täger
Anna Corletto
Hugo A. Katus
Lutz Frankenstein
author_sort Johannes Schnorbach
title N‐terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide eliminates the prognostic effect of atrial fibrillation in patients with chronic heart failure
title_short N‐terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide eliminates the prognostic effect of atrial fibrillation in patients with chronic heart failure
title_full N‐terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide eliminates the prognostic effect of atrial fibrillation in patients with chronic heart failure
title_fullStr N‐terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide eliminates the prognostic effect of atrial fibrillation in patients with chronic heart failure
title_full_unstemmed N‐terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide eliminates the prognostic effect of atrial fibrillation in patients with chronic heart failure
title_sort n‐terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide eliminates the prognostic effect of atrial fibrillation in patients with chronic heart failure
publisher Wiley
series ESC Heart Failure
issn 2055-5822
publishDate 2019-08-01
description Abstract Aims Co‐morbid atrial fibrillation (AF) increases both mortality and N‐terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide (NT‐proBNP) concentrations in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). It is unclear whether AF worsens prognosis independently from NT‐proBNP concentrations. If AF was an independent risk factor, NT‐proBNP levels for outcome prediction would need to be adjusted in patients with AF. We aimed to analyse the influence of AF on the prognostic value of NT‐proBNP in patients with CHF. Methods and results A total of 2541 consecutive CHF patients with sinus rhythm (SR) or AF were identified in the outpatients' CHF registry of the University of Heidelberg, Germany. Of these, 250 patients with SR were individually matched to 250 patients with AF with respect to NT‐proBNP, New York Heart Association functional class, sex, age, and aetiology of CHF. In the general sample, both AF and NT‐proBNP were associated with all‐cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.61–2.39, P < 0.001; and HR = 1.03 per 1000 ng/L increase, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.04, P < 0.001, respectively]. After matching, NT‐proBNP retained its prognostic power (HR = 1.13 per 1000 ng/L increase, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.16, P < 0.001), but AF did not (HR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.25, P = 0.56). Despite similar prognosis, matched patients with SR were in more advanced CHF than were AF patients as indicated by a lower left ventricular ejection fraction (30 ± 13% vs. 34 ± 14%, P < 0.001). Conclusions The prognostic value of NT‐proBNP in CHF is not influenced by concomitant AF. AF, in return, might be a surrogate of a worse cardiac condition rather than an independent risk factor.
topic Chronic heart failure
Atrial fibrillation
NT‐proBNP
Prognosis
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12464
work_keys_str_mv AT johannesschnorbach nterminalprobrainnatriureticpeptideeliminatestheprognosticeffectofatrialfibrillationinpatientswithchronicheartfailure
AT hannafrohlich nterminalprobrainnatriureticpeptideeliminatestheprognosticeffectofatrialfibrillationinpatientswithchronicheartfailure
AT tobiastager nterminalprobrainnatriureticpeptideeliminatestheprognosticeffectofatrialfibrillationinpatientswithchronicheartfailure
AT annacorletto nterminalprobrainnatriureticpeptideeliminatestheprognosticeffectofatrialfibrillationinpatientswithchronicheartfailure
AT hugoakatus nterminalprobrainnatriureticpeptideeliminatestheprognosticeffectofatrialfibrillationinpatientswithchronicheartfailure
AT lutzfrankenstein nterminalprobrainnatriureticpeptideeliminatestheprognosticeffectofatrialfibrillationinpatientswithchronicheartfailure
_version_ 1725030091172347904