Atrioventricular Septal Defect: What Is in a Name?

Robert Anderson has made a huge contribution to almost all aspects of morphology and understanding of congenital cardiac malformations, none more so than the group of anomalies that many of those in the practice of paediatric cardiology and adult congenital heart disease now call ‘Atrioventricular S...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Michael Rigby
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-02-01
Series:Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2308-3425/8/2/19
id doaj-7ee03a52de524a82915a2a65c9c3115d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7ee03a52de524a82915a2a65c9c3115d2021-02-16T00:00:45ZengMDPI AGJournal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease2308-34252021-02-018191910.3390/jcdd8020019Atrioventricular Septal Defect: What Is in a Name?Michael Rigby0MD FRCP FRCPCH, Royal Brompton Hospital, London SW3 6NP, UKRobert Anderson has made a huge contribution to almost all aspects of morphology and understanding of congenital cardiac malformations, none more so than the group of anomalies that many of those in the practice of paediatric cardiology and adult congenital heart disease now call ‘Atrioventricular Septal Defect’ (AVSD). In 1982, with Anton Becker working in Amsterdam, their hallmark ‘What’s in a name?’ editorial was published in the <i>Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery</i>. At that time most described the group of lesions as ‘atrioventricular canal malformation’ or ‘endocardial cushion defect’. Perhaps more significantly, the so-called ostium primum defect was thought to represent a partial variant. It was also universally thought, at that time, that the left atrioventricular valve was no more than a mitral valve with a cleft in the aortic leaflet. In addition to this, lesions such as isolated cleft of the mitral valve, large ventricular septal defects opening to the inlet of the right and hearts with straddling or overriding tricuspid valve were variations of the atrioventricular canal malformation. Anderson and Becker emphasised the differences between the atrioventricular junction in the normal heart and those with a common junction for which they recommended the generic name, ‘atrioventricular septal defect’. As I will discuss, over many years, they continued to work with clinical cardiologists and cardiac surgeons to refine diagnostic criteria and transform the classification and understanding of this complex group of anomalies. Their emphasis was always on accurate diagnosis and communication, which is conveyed in this review.https://www.mdpi.com/2308-3425/8/2/19atrioventricular septal defectAVSDatrioventricular junctionbridging leafletsnomenclatureclassification
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Michael Rigby
spellingShingle Michael Rigby
Atrioventricular Septal Defect: What Is in a Name?
Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease
atrioventricular septal defect
AVSD
atrioventricular junction
bridging leaflets
nomenclature
classification
author_facet Michael Rigby
author_sort Michael Rigby
title Atrioventricular Septal Defect: What Is in a Name?
title_short Atrioventricular Septal Defect: What Is in a Name?
title_full Atrioventricular Septal Defect: What Is in a Name?
title_fullStr Atrioventricular Septal Defect: What Is in a Name?
title_full_unstemmed Atrioventricular Septal Defect: What Is in a Name?
title_sort atrioventricular septal defect: what is in a name?
publisher MDPI AG
series Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease
issn 2308-3425
publishDate 2021-02-01
description Robert Anderson has made a huge contribution to almost all aspects of morphology and understanding of congenital cardiac malformations, none more so than the group of anomalies that many of those in the practice of paediatric cardiology and adult congenital heart disease now call ‘Atrioventricular Septal Defect’ (AVSD). In 1982, with Anton Becker working in Amsterdam, their hallmark ‘What’s in a name?’ editorial was published in the <i>Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery</i>. At that time most described the group of lesions as ‘atrioventricular canal malformation’ or ‘endocardial cushion defect’. Perhaps more significantly, the so-called ostium primum defect was thought to represent a partial variant. It was also universally thought, at that time, that the left atrioventricular valve was no more than a mitral valve with a cleft in the aortic leaflet. In addition to this, lesions such as isolated cleft of the mitral valve, large ventricular septal defects opening to the inlet of the right and hearts with straddling or overriding tricuspid valve were variations of the atrioventricular canal malformation. Anderson and Becker emphasised the differences between the atrioventricular junction in the normal heart and those with a common junction for which they recommended the generic name, ‘atrioventricular septal defect’. As I will discuss, over many years, they continued to work with clinical cardiologists and cardiac surgeons to refine diagnostic criteria and transform the classification and understanding of this complex group of anomalies. Their emphasis was always on accurate diagnosis and communication, which is conveyed in this review.
topic atrioventricular septal defect
AVSD
atrioventricular junction
bridging leaflets
nomenclature
classification
url https://www.mdpi.com/2308-3425/8/2/19
work_keys_str_mv AT michaelrigby atrioventricularseptaldefectwhatisinaname
_version_ 1724268748629606400