Connecting Rigidities of Various Precision Attachments Compared with the Conical Crown Retained Telescope

The purpose of this investigation was to observe the connecting rigidity of various precision attachments and to compare their connecting rigidities with the conical crown retained telescope (CCT). The connecting rigidity of a retainer was assessed using the flexibility test to measure the mesial an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chau-Hsiang Wang, Huey-Er Lee, Je-Kang Du
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2005-01-01
Series:Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1607551X09702724
id doaj-7eea5e7337b74b8bb1dabb4b0f20d332
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7eea5e7337b74b8bb1dabb4b0f20d3322020-11-24T21:29:04ZengWileyKaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences1607-551X2005-01-01211222810.1016/S1607-551X(09)70272-4Connecting Rigidities of Various Precision Attachments Compared with the Conical Crown Retained TelescopeChau-Hsiang WangHuey-Er LeeJe-Kang DuThe purpose of this investigation was to observe the connecting rigidity of various precision attachments and to compare their connecting rigidities with the conical crown retained telescope (CCT). The connecting rigidity of a retainer was assessed using the flexibility test to measure the mesial and distal end displacements. Four precision attachments were analyzed: the dovetail slide attachment beyeler, cylindrical slide attachment, Spang Stabilex and Mini SG. The CCT was used as the control. Although there were many statistically significant differences between the displacements with the various attachments, displacements when vertically loaded were very small: all mesial end displacements were within 3 μm and distal end displacements were 21.4 μm. The largest of the mesial end displacements when horizontally loaded was as large as 44.5 μm (dovetail slide beyeler), while the others were all below 16.5 μm. The same phenomena occurred with the distal end displacements when horizontally loaded: the largest was seen with the dovetail slide beyeler, followed sequentially by the Spang Stabilex, CCT, cylindrical slide, and the Mini SG. The distal displacement with the dovetail slide beyeler was as large as 75.2 μm; those with the others were all below 31.2 μm, with numerous statistically significant differences between the displacements with the various attachments. Thus, connecting rigidities of rigid precision attachments are very similar to CCT, and only the dovetail slide beyeler attachment is too weak to resist horizontal displacement force.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1607551X09702724connecting rigidityprecision attachmentconical crown telescopedistal extension removable partial denture
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Chau-Hsiang Wang
Huey-Er Lee
Je-Kang Du
spellingShingle Chau-Hsiang Wang
Huey-Er Lee
Je-Kang Du
Connecting Rigidities of Various Precision Attachments Compared with the Conical Crown Retained Telescope
Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences
connecting rigidity
precision attachment
conical crown telescope
distal extension removable partial denture
author_facet Chau-Hsiang Wang
Huey-Er Lee
Je-Kang Du
author_sort Chau-Hsiang Wang
title Connecting Rigidities of Various Precision Attachments Compared with the Conical Crown Retained Telescope
title_short Connecting Rigidities of Various Precision Attachments Compared with the Conical Crown Retained Telescope
title_full Connecting Rigidities of Various Precision Attachments Compared with the Conical Crown Retained Telescope
title_fullStr Connecting Rigidities of Various Precision Attachments Compared with the Conical Crown Retained Telescope
title_full_unstemmed Connecting Rigidities of Various Precision Attachments Compared with the Conical Crown Retained Telescope
title_sort connecting rigidities of various precision attachments compared with the conical crown retained telescope
publisher Wiley
series Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences
issn 1607-551X
publishDate 2005-01-01
description The purpose of this investigation was to observe the connecting rigidity of various precision attachments and to compare their connecting rigidities with the conical crown retained telescope (CCT). The connecting rigidity of a retainer was assessed using the flexibility test to measure the mesial and distal end displacements. Four precision attachments were analyzed: the dovetail slide attachment beyeler, cylindrical slide attachment, Spang Stabilex and Mini SG. The CCT was used as the control. Although there were many statistically significant differences between the displacements with the various attachments, displacements when vertically loaded were very small: all mesial end displacements were within 3 μm and distal end displacements were 21.4 μm. The largest of the mesial end displacements when horizontally loaded was as large as 44.5 μm (dovetail slide beyeler), while the others were all below 16.5 μm. The same phenomena occurred with the distal end displacements when horizontally loaded: the largest was seen with the dovetail slide beyeler, followed sequentially by the Spang Stabilex, CCT, cylindrical slide, and the Mini SG. The distal displacement with the dovetail slide beyeler was as large as 75.2 μm; those with the others were all below 31.2 μm, with numerous statistically significant differences between the displacements with the various attachments. Thus, connecting rigidities of rigid precision attachments are very similar to CCT, and only the dovetail slide beyeler attachment is too weak to resist horizontal displacement force.
topic connecting rigidity
precision attachment
conical crown telescope
distal extension removable partial denture
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1607551X09702724
work_keys_str_mv AT chauhsiangwang connectingrigiditiesofvariousprecisionattachmentscomparedwiththeconicalcrownretainedtelescope
AT hueyerlee connectingrigiditiesofvariousprecisionattachmentscomparedwiththeconicalcrownretainedtelescope
AT jekangdu connectingrigiditiesofvariousprecisionattachmentscomparedwiththeconicalcrownretainedtelescope
_version_ 1725967609665421312