Novel Instruments for Percutaneous Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery for Full Decompression and Dural Management: A Comparative Analysis
Background: Post-laminectomy syndrome is a common cause of dissatisfaction after endoscopic interlaminar approach. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of our two newly designed instruments for laminotomy, a dural protector attached to the scope and a knot pusher for water-tight suturing...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-08-01
|
Series: | Brain Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/10/8/516 |
id |
doaj-7ef5428c9098463195c21e9d2f1541ac |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-7ef5428c9098463195c21e9d2f1541ac2020-11-25T03:35:54ZengMDPI AGBrain Sciences2076-34252020-08-011051651610.3390/brainsci10080516Novel Instruments for Percutaneous Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery for Full Decompression and Dural Management: A Comparative AnalysisYoung-Ho Hong0Seung-Kook Kim1Dong-Won Suh2Su-Chan Lee3Department of Spine Center, Barun-Sesang Hospital, 5, Yatap-ro 75 Beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do 13497, KoreaHimchan UHS Spine and Joint Institute, University Hospital of Sharjah, University Street 1, Sharjah 72772, UAEDepartment of Spine Center, Barun-Sesang Hospital, 5, Yatap-ro 75 Beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do 13497, KoreaJoint and Arthritis Research, Orthopaedic Surgery, Himchan Hospital, 120, Sinmok-ro, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul 07999, KoreaBackground: Post-laminectomy syndrome is a common cause of dissatisfaction after endoscopic interlaminar approach. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of our two newly designed instruments for laminotomy, a dural protector attached to the scope and a knot pusher for water-tight suturing of the incidental dural tears. Material and Methods: This was a multicenter evaluation. Efficacy was quantified as the pre-to-postoperative improvement in pain (visual analog scale), disability (Oswestry Disability Index), patient satisfaction (modified MacNab score), and length of hospital stay. Safety was quantified by the incidence and location of dural tears, rate of revision, and radiological outcomes. Outcomes were evaluated between the control (before instrument development) and experimental (after instrument development) groups. Results: There was a significant improvement in leg pain in the experimental group (<i>p</i> = 0.03), with greater patient satisfaction in the control group (<i>p</i> < 0.01). There was no incidence of dural tears in the area of the traversing and exiting nerve roots in the experimental group. Water-tightness of sutures was confirmed radiologically. Conclusion: The novel dural protector and the knot pusher for water-tight sutures improved the efficacy and safety of decompression and discectomy; however, a prolonged operative time was a drawback.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/10/8/516biportal endoscopic spine surgerydural protectionendoscopic decompressionpercutaneous biportal endoscopic spine surgeryunilateral biportal endoscopy |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Young-Ho Hong Seung-Kook Kim Dong-Won Suh Su-Chan Lee |
spellingShingle |
Young-Ho Hong Seung-Kook Kim Dong-Won Suh Su-Chan Lee Novel Instruments for Percutaneous Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery for Full Decompression and Dural Management: A Comparative Analysis Brain Sciences biportal endoscopic spine surgery dural protection endoscopic decompression percutaneous biportal endoscopic spine surgery unilateral biportal endoscopy |
author_facet |
Young-Ho Hong Seung-Kook Kim Dong-Won Suh Su-Chan Lee |
author_sort |
Young-Ho Hong |
title |
Novel Instruments for Percutaneous Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery for Full Decompression and Dural Management: A Comparative Analysis |
title_short |
Novel Instruments for Percutaneous Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery for Full Decompression and Dural Management: A Comparative Analysis |
title_full |
Novel Instruments for Percutaneous Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery for Full Decompression and Dural Management: A Comparative Analysis |
title_fullStr |
Novel Instruments for Percutaneous Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery for Full Decompression and Dural Management: A Comparative Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Novel Instruments for Percutaneous Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery for Full Decompression and Dural Management: A Comparative Analysis |
title_sort |
novel instruments for percutaneous biportal endoscopic spine surgery for full decompression and dural management: a comparative analysis |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Brain Sciences |
issn |
2076-3425 |
publishDate |
2020-08-01 |
description |
Background: Post-laminectomy syndrome is a common cause of dissatisfaction after endoscopic interlaminar approach. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of our two newly designed instruments for laminotomy, a dural protector attached to the scope and a knot pusher for water-tight suturing of the incidental dural tears. Material and Methods: This was a multicenter evaluation. Efficacy was quantified as the pre-to-postoperative improvement in pain (visual analog scale), disability (Oswestry Disability Index), patient satisfaction (modified MacNab score), and length of hospital stay. Safety was quantified by the incidence and location of dural tears, rate of revision, and radiological outcomes. Outcomes were evaluated between the control (before instrument development) and experimental (after instrument development) groups. Results: There was a significant improvement in leg pain in the experimental group (<i>p</i> = 0.03), with greater patient satisfaction in the control group (<i>p</i> < 0.01). There was no incidence of dural tears in the area of the traversing and exiting nerve roots in the experimental group. Water-tightness of sutures was confirmed radiologically. Conclusion: The novel dural protector and the knot pusher for water-tight sutures improved the efficacy and safety of decompression and discectomy; however, a prolonged operative time was a drawback. |
topic |
biportal endoscopic spine surgery dural protection endoscopic decompression percutaneous biportal endoscopic spine surgery unilateral biportal endoscopy |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/10/8/516 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT younghohong novelinstrumentsforpercutaneousbiportalendoscopicspinesurgeryforfulldecompressionandduralmanagementacomparativeanalysis AT seungkookkim novelinstrumentsforpercutaneousbiportalendoscopicspinesurgeryforfulldecompressionandduralmanagementacomparativeanalysis AT dongwonsuh novelinstrumentsforpercutaneousbiportalendoscopicspinesurgeryforfulldecompressionandduralmanagementacomparativeanalysis AT suchanlee novelinstrumentsforpercutaneousbiportalendoscopicspinesurgeryforfulldecompressionandduralmanagementacomparativeanalysis |
_version_ |
1724552505358024704 |