Demanda e resposta
The present article is about the binomial demands and responses under the perspective of the process as a bilateral tutelage where the author as well as the defendant require an initial demand which delimits the whole jurisdictional activity: The author expects the defendant's reluctancy to be...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Portuguese |
| Published: |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina
2004-12-01
|
| Series: | Scientia Iuris |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/11127 |
| Summary: | The present article is about the binomial demands and responses under the perspective of the process as a bilateral tutelage where the author as well as the defendant require an initial demand which delimits the whole jurisdictional activity: The author expects the defendant's reluctancy to be declared and injustified. The defendant on the other hand claims his contraposition to the demander's intention is just. Therefore, the State will have intervene in order to fairly indicate which posture should prevail and by doing so pacify the dispute.<br>O artigo trata do binômio demanda e resposta sob a perspectiva do processo como tutela bilateral, onde tanto o autor quanto o réu deduzem uma demanda inicial, que delimita toda a atividade jurisdicional. O autor objetiva que a resistência do réu seja declarada injustificada e cesse, por seu turno, o réu pretende a declaração de que é justa a sua contraposição a pretensão do demandante. De tal forma, o Estado virá intervir para, imparcialmente, indicar qual postura há de prevalecer, pacificando o conflito. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1415-6490 2178-8189 |