Exploring Accelerometer Versus Self-Report Sleep Assessment in Youth With Concussion

This study examines accelerometer-based and self-report assessment of sleep disturbance from a larger prospective cohort of youth 5 to 18 years of age with postconcussive injury. Twenty-one participants with self-reported sleep disturbance were evaluated using accelerometers. Participants completed...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ivona Berger BHSc, Joyce Obeid PhD, Brian W. Timmons PhD, Carol DeMatteo MSc, DipP & OT
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2017-12-01
Series:Global Pediatric Health
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2333794X17745973
id doaj-7f2a5d3748ac4390b8a82d6c180785fb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7f2a5d3748ac4390b8a82d6c180785fb2020-11-25T03:44:06ZengSAGE PublishingGlobal Pediatric Health2333-794X2017-12-01410.1177/2333794X17745973Exploring Accelerometer Versus Self-Report Sleep Assessment in Youth With ConcussionIvona Berger BHSc0Joyce Obeid PhD1Brian W. Timmons PhD2Carol DeMatteo MSc, DipP & OT3University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaMcMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, CanadaMcMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, CanadaMcMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, CanadaThis study examines accelerometer-based and self-report assessment of sleep disturbance from a larger prospective cohort of youth 5 to 18 years of age with postconcussive injury. Twenty-one participants with self-reported sleep disturbance were evaluated using accelerometers. Participants completed the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) every 48 hours and also measured sleep via accelerometry. Correlations were conducted matching PSQI scores to accelerometry assessment. PSQI scores were significantly correlated only with “average number of awakenings” ( r = −0.21; P = .049). Accelerometer-measured mean (standard deviation) sleep efficiency was 79.9% (5.20%), with normal sleep defined as >85%. The mean (standard deviation) PSQI global score was 10.5 (3.78) out of 21, where scores of >5 indicate subjective insomnia. Results suggest the PSQI and accelerometers may be measuring different attributes of sleep. Both may be needed as actual sleep is important but so is perception of good sleep. These findings call for further validity testing of objective sleep assessment measures and commonly used self-report tools.https://doi.org/10.1177/2333794X17745973
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ivona Berger BHSc
Joyce Obeid PhD
Brian W. Timmons PhD
Carol DeMatteo MSc, DipP & OT
spellingShingle Ivona Berger BHSc
Joyce Obeid PhD
Brian W. Timmons PhD
Carol DeMatteo MSc, DipP & OT
Exploring Accelerometer Versus Self-Report Sleep Assessment in Youth With Concussion
Global Pediatric Health
author_facet Ivona Berger BHSc
Joyce Obeid PhD
Brian W. Timmons PhD
Carol DeMatteo MSc, DipP & OT
author_sort Ivona Berger BHSc
title Exploring Accelerometer Versus Self-Report Sleep Assessment in Youth With Concussion
title_short Exploring Accelerometer Versus Self-Report Sleep Assessment in Youth With Concussion
title_full Exploring Accelerometer Versus Self-Report Sleep Assessment in Youth With Concussion
title_fullStr Exploring Accelerometer Versus Self-Report Sleep Assessment in Youth With Concussion
title_full_unstemmed Exploring Accelerometer Versus Self-Report Sleep Assessment in Youth With Concussion
title_sort exploring accelerometer versus self-report sleep assessment in youth with concussion
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Global Pediatric Health
issn 2333-794X
publishDate 2017-12-01
description This study examines accelerometer-based and self-report assessment of sleep disturbance from a larger prospective cohort of youth 5 to 18 years of age with postconcussive injury. Twenty-one participants with self-reported sleep disturbance were evaluated using accelerometers. Participants completed the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) every 48 hours and also measured sleep via accelerometry. Correlations were conducted matching PSQI scores to accelerometry assessment. PSQI scores were significantly correlated only with “average number of awakenings” ( r = −0.21; P = .049). Accelerometer-measured mean (standard deviation) sleep efficiency was 79.9% (5.20%), with normal sleep defined as >85%. The mean (standard deviation) PSQI global score was 10.5 (3.78) out of 21, where scores of >5 indicate subjective insomnia. Results suggest the PSQI and accelerometers may be measuring different attributes of sleep. Both may be needed as actual sleep is important but so is perception of good sleep. These findings call for further validity testing of objective sleep assessment measures and commonly used self-report tools.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2333794X17745973
work_keys_str_mv AT ivonabergerbhsc exploringaccelerometerversusselfreportsleepassessmentinyouthwithconcussion
AT joyceobeidphd exploringaccelerometerversusselfreportsleepassessmentinyouthwithconcussion
AT brianwtimmonsphd exploringaccelerometerversusselfreportsleepassessmentinyouthwithconcussion
AT caroldematteomscdippot exploringaccelerometerversusselfreportsleepassessmentinyouthwithconcussion
_version_ 1724516206789001216