Beware the Boojum: Caveats and Strengths of Avian Radar

Radar provides a useful and powerful tool to wildlife biologists and ornithologists. However, radar also has the potential for errors on a scale not previously possible. In this paper, we focus on the strengths and limitations of avian surveillance radars that use marine radar front-ends integrated...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Robert C. Beason, Tim J. Nohara, Peter Weber
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Utah State University 2017-02-01
Series:Human-Wildlife Interactions
Subjects:
Online Access:https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/hwi/vol7/iss1/4
id doaj-7f4e7c0057aa4217950de46b14ec824c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7f4e7c0057aa4217950de46b14ec824c2020-11-25T03:42:42ZengUtah State UniversityHuman-Wildlife Interactions2155-38742155-38742017-02-017110.26077/0fvy-6k61Beware the Boojum: Caveats and Strengths of Avian RadarRobert C. Beason0Tim J. Nohara1Peter Weber2Wildlife Services’ National Wildlife Research CenterAccipiter Radar Technologies Inc.Accipiter Radar Technologies Inc.Radar provides a useful and powerful tool to wildlife biologists and ornithologists. However, radar also has the potential for errors on a scale not previously possible. In this paper, we focus on the strengths and limitations of avian surveillance radars that use marine radar front-ends integrated with digital radar processors to provide 360° of coverage. Modern digital radar processors automatically extract target information, including such various target attributes as location, speed, heading, intensity, and radar cross-section (size) as functions of time. Such data can be stored indefinitely, providing a rich resource for ornithologists and wildlife managers. Interpreting these attributes in view of the sensor’s characteristics from which they are generated is the key to correctly deriving and exploiting application-specific information about birds and bats. We also discuss (1) weather radars and air-traffic control surveillance radars that could be used to monitor birds on larger, coarser spatial scales; (2) other nonsurveillance radar configurations, such as vertically scanning radars used for vertical profiling of birds along a particular corridor; and (3) Doppler, single-target tracking radars used for extracting radial velocity and wing-beat frequency information from individual birds for species identification purposes. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/hwi/vol7/iss1/4aircraftavian radarbashbird strikeconservationenvironmental impact assessmenthuman–wildlife conflictsmobile radarmarine radarnatural resource managementornithology
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Robert C. Beason
Tim J. Nohara
Peter Weber
spellingShingle Robert C. Beason
Tim J. Nohara
Peter Weber
Beware the Boojum: Caveats and Strengths of Avian Radar
Human-Wildlife Interactions
aircraft
avian radar
bash
bird strike
conservation
environmental impact assessment
human–wildlife conflicts
mobile radar
marine radar
natural resource management
ornithology
author_facet Robert C. Beason
Tim J. Nohara
Peter Weber
author_sort Robert C. Beason
title Beware the Boojum: Caveats and Strengths of Avian Radar
title_short Beware the Boojum: Caveats and Strengths of Avian Radar
title_full Beware the Boojum: Caveats and Strengths of Avian Radar
title_fullStr Beware the Boojum: Caveats and Strengths of Avian Radar
title_full_unstemmed Beware the Boojum: Caveats and Strengths of Avian Radar
title_sort beware the boojum: caveats and strengths of avian radar
publisher Utah State University
series Human-Wildlife Interactions
issn 2155-3874
2155-3874
publishDate 2017-02-01
description Radar provides a useful and powerful tool to wildlife biologists and ornithologists. However, radar also has the potential for errors on a scale not previously possible. In this paper, we focus on the strengths and limitations of avian surveillance radars that use marine radar front-ends integrated with digital radar processors to provide 360° of coverage. Modern digital radar processors automatically extract target information, including such various target attributes as location, speed, heading, intensity, and radar cross-section (size) as functions of time. Such data can be stored indefinitely, providing a rich resource for ornithologists and wildlife managers. Interpreting these attributes in view of the sensor’s characteristics from which they are generated is the key to correctly deriving and exploiting application-specific information about birds and bats. We also discuss (1) weather radars and air-traffic control surveillance radars that could be used to monitor birds on larger, coarser spatial scales; (2) other nonsurveillance radar configurations, such as vertically scanning radars used for vertical profiling of birds along a particular corridor; and (3) Doppler, single-target tracking radars used for extracting radial velocity and wing-beat frequency information from individual birds for species identification purposes.
topic aircraft
avian radar
bash
bird strike
conservation
environmental impact assessment
human–wildlife conflicts
mobile radar
marine radar
natural resource management
ornithology
url https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/hwi/vol7/iss1/4
work_keys_str_mv AT robertcbeason bewaretheboojumcaveatsandstrengthsofavianradar
AT timjnohara bewaretheboojumcaveatsandstrengthsofavianradar
AT peterweber bewaretheboojumcaveatsandstrengthsofavianradar
_version_ 1724524158726963200