Migrants’ Social Positioning Strategies in Transnational Social Spaces
This article examines the nexus of spatial and social mobility by focusing on how migrants in Germany use cultural, economic and moral boundaries to position themselves socially in transnational social spaces. It is based on a mixed-methods approach, drawing on qualitative interviews and panel data...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cogitatio
2021-02-01
|
Series: | Social Inclusion |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/3584 |
id |
doaj-7f619cecd3594521a5d0551d796ad545 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-7f619cecd3594521a5d0551d796ad5452021-02-18T15:42:35ZengCogitatioSocial Inclusion2183-28032021-02-01919110310.17645/si.v9i1.35841850Migrants’ Social Positioning Strategies in Transnational Social SpacesInka Stock0Joanna Jadwiga Fröhlich1Faculty of Sociology, Bielefeld University, GermanyFaculty of Sociology, Bielefeld University, GermanyThis article examines the nexus of spatial and social mobility by focusing on how migrants in Germany use cultural, economic and moral boundaries to position themselves socially in transnational social spaces. It is based on a mixed-methods approach, drawing on qualitative interviews and panel data from the German Socio-Economic Panel Survey. By focusing on how people from different origins and classes use different sets of symbolic boundaries to give meaning to their social mobility trajectories, we link subjective positioning strategies with structural features of people’s mobility experience. We find that people use a class-specific boundary pattern, which has strong transnational features, because migrants tend to mix symbolic and material markers of status hierarchies relevant to both their origin and destination countries. We identify three different types of boundary patterns, which exemplify different ways in which objective structure and subjectively experienced inequalities influence migrants’ social positioning strategies in transnational spaces. These different types also exemplify how migrants’ habitus influences their social positioning strategies, depending on their mobility and social trajectory in transnational spaces.https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/3584germanymigrationsocial classsocial inequalitysocial mobilitysymbolic boundaries |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Inka Stock Joanna Jadwiga Fröhlich |
spellingShingle |
Inka Stock Joanna Jadwiga Fröhlich Migrants’ Social Positioning Strategies in Transnational Social Spaces Social Inclusion germany migration social class social inequality social mobility symbolic boundaries |
author_facet |
Inka Stock Joanna Jadwiga Fröhlich |
author_sort |
Inka Stock |
title |
Migrants’ Social Positioning Strategies in Transnational Social Spaces |
title_short |
Migrants’ Social Positioning Strategies in Transnational Social Spaces |
title_full |
Migrants’ Social Positioning Strategies in Transnational Social Spaces |
title_fullStr |
Migrants’ Social Positioning Strategies in Transnational Social Spaces |
title_full_unstemmed |
Migrants’ Social Positioning Strategies in Transnational Social Spaces |
title_sort |
migrants’ social positioning strategies in transnational social spaces |
publisher |
Cogitatio |
series |
Social Inclusion |
issn |
2183-2803 |
publishDate |
2021-02-01 |
description |
This article examines the nexus of spatial and social mobility by focusing on how migrants in Germany use cultural, economic and moral boundaries to position themselves socially in transnational social spaces. It is based on a mixed-methods approach, drawing on qualitative interviews and panel data from the German Socio-Economic Panel Survey. By focusing on how people from different origins and classes use different sets of symbolic boundaries to give meaning to their social mobility trajectories, we link subjective positioning strategies with structural features of people’s mobility experience. We find that people use a class-specific boundary pattern, which has strong transnational features, because migrants tend to mix symbolic and material markers of status hierarchies relevant to both their origin and destination countries. We identify three different types of boundary patterns, which exemplify different ways in which objective structure and subjectively experienced inequalities influence migrants’ social positioning strategies in transnational spaces. These different types also exemplify how migrants’ habitus influences their social positioning strategies, depending on their mobility and social trajectory in transnational spaces. |
topic |
germany migration social class social inequality social mobility symbolic boundaries |
url |
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/3584 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT inkastock migrantssocialpositioningstrategiesintransnationalsocialspaces AT joannajadwigafrohlich migrantssocialpositioningstrategiesintransnationalsocialspaces |
_version_ |
1724262632453570560 |