Significance of the Permanent Court of Arbitration judgment of 12 July 2016 in the South China Sea Case no 2013–19 to selected issues of international law of the sea
South China Sea Arbitration case No 2013–19 was an arbitration case brought by the Philippines against China at the Permanent Court of Arbitration. As China did not accept the arbitration initiated by the Philippines, what significance can bear this PCA ’s judgment? The 501 pages-long award on such...
Main Authors: | Karol Karski, Paweł Mielniczek |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego
2017-01-01
|
Series: | Acta Iuris Stetinensis |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://wnus.edu.pl/ais/pl/issue/763/article/12301/ |
Similar Items
-
Study court intervention in the appointment of arbitrator, Review law, jurisprudence and presentation template
by: Hamid Derakhshan nia, et al.
Published: (2018-04-01) -
ARBITRATION AND LEX SPORTIVA: THE CASE OF THE COURT OF ARBITRATION FOR SPORT (CAS)
by: Mateus de Oliveira Fornasier, et al.
Published: (2017-08-01) -
The Role of Courts in International Arbitration: A Critical Assessment on the Arbitration Draft Bill in Iran from the Perspective of Modern Arbitration Rules
by: Masoud Mahboub, et al.
Published: (2018-04-01) -
The Roles of the Supreme Court of the Republic Indonesia in Enforcement of International Arbitral Awards in Indonesia
by: Mutiara Hikmah
Published: (2013-09-01) -
Specifics of the Court of Arbitration in sport as an international arbitration body
by: Galantić Miloš B.
Published: (2015-01-01)