Perceived barriers and attitudes toward arteriovenous fistula creation and use in hemodialysis patients in Palestine

• Main Authors: Ala O. Shamasneh, Anwar S. Atieh, Kamel A. Gharaibeh, Abdurrahman Hamadah
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2020-01-01
• Series: Renal Failure
• Subjects: end stage renal disease; hemodialysis; arteriovenous fistula; central venous catheter; barriers
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0886022X.2020.1748650

In the dialysis center in Ramallah, we investigated the attitudes and perceived barriers to having arteriovenous fistula (AVF) in 156 patients. The current method of HD access was AVF in 52% and central venous catheter in 47%. Perceived causes of no or delayed AVF were: patient’s refusal of AVF in 54.5%, late referral to a surgical evaluation in 31.3% and too long to surgical appointments in 14.2%. Among those who refused AVF, reasons were: concern about the surgical procedure in 42.5%, poor understanding of disease/access in 23.3%, fear of needles in 15.1%, denial of disease or need for HD in 17.8%, and cosmetic reasons in 1.4%. Forty six percent of patients believed they received education about AVF prior to the creation of HD access, and 73.7% would recommend AVF as the method of access due to the lower risk of infection (96%), easier to care for (16%), easier showering (14%), and better-associated hygiene (3%). In conclusion, the majority would recommend an AVF as the mode of vascular access for HD. The most common barrier to having an AVF was patient’s refusal to undergo AVF creation because of their concern about the surgical procedure. A systematic evaluation of the process that precedes the creation of AVF may allow for better utilization.