Estimating length of stay and inpatient charges attributable to hospital-acquired bloodstream infections

Abstract Background Hospital-acquired bloodstream infection (BSI) is associated with high morbidity and mortality and increases patients’ length of stay (LOS) and hospital charges. Our goals were to calculate LOS and charges attributable to BSI and compare results among different models. Methods A r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yuzheng Zhang, Mingmei Du, Janice Mary Johnston, Ellie Bostwick Andres, Jijiang Suo, Hongwu Yao, Rui Huo, Yunxi Liu, Qiang Fu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-08-01
Series:Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13756-020-00796-5
id doaj-7ffa1ed2e16444bbaa6bd280e8040723
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7ffa1ed2e16444bbaa6bd280e80407232020-11-25T03:35:24ZengBMCAntimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control2047-29942020-08-01911810.1186/s13756-020-00796-5Estimating length of stay and inpatient charges attributable to hospital-acquired bloodstream infectionsYuzheng Zhang0Mingmei Du1Janice Mary Johnston2Ellie Bostwick Andres3Jijiang Suo4Hongwu Yao5Rui Huo6Yunxi Liu7Qiang Fu8School of Public Health, The University of Hong KongDepartment of Infection Management and Disease Control, Chinese PLA General HospitalSchool of Public Health, The University of Hong KongSchool of Public Health, The University of Hong KongDepartment of Infection Management and Disease Control, Chinese PLA General HospitalDepartment of Infection Management and Disease Control, Chinese PLA General HospitalXingLin Information Technology CompanyDepartment of Infection Management and Disease Control, Chinese PLA General HospitalChina National Health Development Research CenterAbstract Background Hospital-acquired bloodstream infection (BSI) is associated with high morbidity and mortality and increases patients’ length of stay (LOS) and hospital charges. Our goals were to calculate LOS and charges attributable to BSI and compare results among different models. Methods A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted in 2017 in a large general hospital, in Beijing. Using patient-level data, we compared the attributable LOS and charges of BSI with three models: 1) conventional non-matching, 2) propensity score matching controlling for the impact of potential confounding variables, and 3) risk set matching controlling for time-varying covariates and matching based on propensity score and infection time. Results The study included 118,600 patient admissions, 557 (0.47%) with BSI. Six hundred fourteen microorganisms were cultured from patients with BSI. Escherichia coli was the most common bacteria (106, 17.26%). Among multi-drug resistant bacteria, carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) was the most common (42, 38.53%). In the conventional non-matching model, the excess LOS and charges associated with BSI were 25.06 days (P < 0.05) and US$22041.73 (P < 0.05), respectively. After matching, the mean LOS and charges attributable to BSI both decreased. When infection time was incorporated into the risk set matching model, the excess LOS and charges were 16.86 days (P < 0.05) and US$15909.21 (P < 0.05), respectively. Conclusion This is the first study to consider time-dependent bias in estimating excess LOS and charges attributable to BSI in a Chinese hospital setting. We found matching on infection time can reduce bias.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13756-020-00796-5Hospital-acquired bloodstream infectionLength of stayHospital charge
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yuzheng Zhang
Mingmei Du
Janice Mary Johnston
Ellie Bostwick Andres
Jijiang Suo
Hongwu Yao
Rui Huo
Yunxi Liu
Qiang Fu
spellingShingle Yuzheng Zhang
Mingmei Du
Janice Mary Johnston
Ellie Bostwick Andres
Jijiang Suo
Hongwu Yao
Rui Huo
Yunxi Liu
Qiang Fu
Estimating length of stay and inpatient charges attributable to hospital-acquired bloodstream infections
Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
Hospital-acquired bloodstream infection
Length of stay
Hospital charge
author_facet Yuzheng Zhang
Mingmei Du
Janice Mary Johnston
Ellie Bostwick Andres
Jijiang Suo
Hongwu Yao
Rui Huo
Yunxi Liu
Qiang Fu
author_sort Yuzheng Zhang
title Estimating length of stay and inpatient charges attributable to hospital-acquired bloodstream infections
title_short Estimating length of stay and inpatient charges attributable to hospital-acquired bloodstream infections
title_full Estimating length of stay and inpatient charges attributable to hospital-acquired bloodstream infections
title_fullStr Estimating length of stay and inpatient charges attributable to hospital-acquired bloodstream infections
title_full_unstemmed Estimating length of stay and inpatient charges attributable to hospital-acquired bloodstream infections
title_sort estimating length of stay and inpatient charges attributable to hospital-acquired bloodstream infections
publisher BMC
series Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
issn 2047-2994
publishDate 2020-08-01
description Abstract Background Hospital-acquired bloodstream infection (BSI) is associated with high morbidity and mortality and increases patients’ length of stay (LOS) and hospital charges. Our goals were to calculate LOS and charges attributable to BSI and compare results among different models. Methods A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted in 2017 in a large general hospital, in Beijing. Using patient-level data, we compared the attributable LOS and charges of BSI with three models: 1) conventional non-matching, 2) propensity score matching controlling for the impact of potential confounding variables, and 3) risk set matching controlling for time-varying covariates and matching based on propensity score and infection time. Results The study included 118,600 patient admissions, 557 (0.47%) with BSI. Six hundred fourteen microorganisms were cultured from patients with BSI. Escherichia coli was the most common bacteria (106, 17.26%). Among multi-drug resistant bacteria, carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) was the most common (42, 38.53%). In the conventional non-matching model, the excess LOS and charges associated with BSI were 25.06 days (P < 0.05) and US$22041.73 (P < 0.05), respectively. After matching, the mean LOS and charges attributable to BSI both decreased. When infection time was incorporated into the risk set matching model, the excess LOS and charges were 16.86 days (P < 0.05) and US$15909.21 (P < 0.05), respectively. Conclusion This is the first study to consider time-dependent bias in estimating excess LOS and charges attributable to BSI in a Chinese hospital setting. We found matching on infection time can reduce bias.
topic Hospital-acquired bloodstream infection
Length of stay
Hospital charge
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13756-020-00796-5
work_keys_str_mv AT yuzhengzhang estimatinglengthofstayandinpatientchargesattributabletohospitalacquiredbloodstreaminfections
AT mingmeidu estimatinglengthofstayandinpatientchargesattributabletohospitalacquiredbloodstreaminfections
AT janicemaryjohnston estimatinglengthofstayandinpatientchargesattributabletohospitalacquiredbloodstreaminfections
AT elliebostwickandres estimatinglengthofstayandinpatientchargesattributabletohospitalacquiredbloodstreaminfections
AT jijiangsuo estimatinglengthofstayandinpatientchargesattributabletohospitalacquiredbloodstreaminfections
AT hongwuyao estimatinglengthofstayandinpatientchargesattributabletohospitalacquiredbloodstreaminfections
AT ruihuo estimatinglengthofstayandinpatientchargesattributabletohospitalacquiredbloodstreaminfections
AT yunxiliu estimatinglengthofstayandinpatientchargesattributabletohospitalacquiredbloodstreaminfections
AT qiangfu estimatinglengthofstayandinpatientchargesattributabletohospitalacquiredbloodstreaminfections
_version_ 1724554617417629696