A fine‐needle aspiration‐based protein signature discriminates benign from malignant breast lesions

There are increasing demands for informative cancer biomarkers, accessible via minimally invasive procedures, both for initial diagnostics and to follow‐up personalized cancer therapy. Fine‐needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy provides ready access to relevant tissues; however, the minute sample amounts r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bo Franzén, Masood Kamali‐Moghaddam, Andrey Alexeyenko, Thomas Hatschek, Susanne Becker, Lotta Wik, Jonas Kierkegaard, Annika Eriksson, Naveen R. Muppani, Gert Auer, Ulf Landegren, Rolf Lewensohn
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2018-09-01
Series:Molecular Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/1878-0261.12350
id doaj-801210110a314b449358aec16284a545
record_format Article
spelling doaj-801210110a314b449358aec16284a5452020-11-25T03:56:53ZengWileyMolecular Oncology1574-78911878-02612018-09-011291415142810.1002/1878-0261.12350A fine‐needle aspiration‐based protein signature discriminates benign from malignant breast lesionsBo Franzén0Masood Kamali‐Moghaddam1Andrey Alexeyenko2Thomas Hatschek3Susanne Becker4Lotta Wik5Jonas Kierkegaard6Annika Eriksson7Naveen R. Muppani8Gert Auer9Ulf Landegren10Rolf Lewensohn11Department of Oncology and Pathology Cancer Center Karolinska Karolinska Institutet and University Hospital Stockholm SwedenDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology Science for Life Laboratory Uppsala University SwedenDepartment of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology (MTC) Karolinska Institutet Stockholm SwedenDepartment of Oncology and Pathology Cancer Center Karolinska Karolinska Institutet and University Hospital Stockholm SwedenDepartment of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology (MTC) Karolinska Institutet Stockholm SwedenDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology Science for Life Laboratory Uppsala University SwedenBröstCentrum City Stockholm SwedenKIGene MMK Neurogenetics Unit CMM Karolinska Institutet Stockholm SwedenDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology Science for Life Laboratory Uppsala University SwedenDepartment of Oncology and Pathology Cancer Center Karolinska Karolinska Institutet and University Hospital Stockholm SwedenDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology Science for Life Laboratory Uppsala University SwedenDepartment of Oncology and Pathology Cancer Center Karolinska Karolinska Institutet and University Hospital Stockholm SwedenThere are increasing demands for informative cancer biomarkers, accessible via minimally invasive procedures, both for initial diagnostics and to follow‐up personalized cancer therapy. Fine‐needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy provides ready access to relevant tissues; however, the minute sample amounts require sensitive multiplex molecular analysis to achieve clinical utility. We have applied proximity extension assays (PEA) and NanoString (NS) technology for analyses of proteins and of RNA, respectively, in FNA samples. Using samples from patients with breast cancer (BC, n = 25) or benign lesions (n = 33), we demonstrate that these FNA‐based molecular analyses (a) can offer high sensitivity and reproducibility, (b) may provide correct diagnosis in shorter time and at a lower cost than current practice, (c) correlate with results from routine analysis (i.e., benchmarking against immunohistochemistry tests for ER, PR, HER2, and Ki67), and (d) may also help identify new markers related to immunotherapy. A specific 11‐protein signature, including FGF binding protein 1, decorin, and furin, distinguished all cancer patient samples from all benign lesions in our main cohort and in smaller replication cohort. Due to the minimally traumatic sampling and rich molecular information, this combined proteomics and transcriptomic methodology is promising for diagnostics and evaluation of treatment efficacy in BC.https://doi.org/10.1002/1878-0261.12350breast cancer diagnosisfine‐needle aspirationprotein biomarkerproximity extension assay
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bo Franzén
Masood Kamali‐Moghaddam
Andrey Alexeyenko
Thomas Hatschek
Susanne Becker
Lotta Wik
Jonas Kierkegaard
Annika Eriksson
Naveen R. Muppani
Gert Auer
Ulf Landegren
Rolf Lewensohn
spellingShingle Bo Franzén
Masood Kamali‐Moghaddam
Andrey Alexeyenko
Thomas Hatschek
Susanne Becker
Lotta Wik
Jonas Kierkegaard
Annika Eriksson
Naveen R. Muppani
Gert Auer
Ulf Landegren
Rolf Lewensohn
A fine‐needle aspiration‐based protein signature discriminates benign from malignant breast lesions
Molecular Oncology
breast cancer diagnosis
fine‐needle aspiration
protein biomarker
proximity extension assay
author_facet Bo Franzén
Masood Kamali‐Moghaddam
Andrey Alexeyenko
Thomas Hatschek
Susanne Becker
Lotta Wik
Jonas Kierkegaard
Annika Eriksson
Naveen R. Muppani
Gert Auer
Ulf Landegren
Rolf Lewensohn
author_sort Bo Franzén
title A fine‐needle aspiration‐based protein signature discriminates benign from malignant breast lesions
title_short A fine‐needle aspiration‐based protein signature discriminates benign from malignant breast lesions
title_full A fine‐needle aspiration‐based protein signature discriminates benign from malignant breast lesions
title_fullStr A fine‐needle aspiration‐based protein signature discriminates benign from malignant breast lesions
title_full_unstemmed A fine‐needle aspiration‐based protein signature discriminates benign from malignant breast lesions
title_sort fine‐needle aspiration‐based protein signature discriminates benign from malignant breast lesions
publisher Wiley
series Molecular Oncology
issn 1574-7891
1878-0261
publishDate 2018-09-01
description There are increasing demands for informative cancer biomarkers, accessible via minimally invasive procedures, both for initial diagnostics and to follow‐up personalized cancer therapy. Fine‐needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy provides ready access to relevant tissues; however, the minute sample amounts require sensitive multiplex molecular analysis to achieve clinical utility. We have applied proximity extension assays (PEA) and NanoString (NS) technology for analyses of proteins and of RNA, respectively, in FNA samples. Using samples from patients with breast cancer (BC, n = 25) or benign lesions (n = 33), we demonstrate that these FNA‐based molecular analyses (a) can offer high sensitivity and reproducibility, (b) may provide correct diagnosis in shorter time and at a lower cost than current practice, (c) correlate with results from routine analysis (i.e., benchmarking against immunohistochemistry tests for ER, PR, HER2, and Ki67), and (d) may also help identify new markers related to immunotherapy. A specific 11‐protein signature, including FGF binding protein 1, decorin, and furin, distinguished all cancer patient samples from all benign lesions in our main cohort and in smaller replication cohort. Due to the minimally traumatic sampling and rich molecular information, this combined proteomics and transcriptomic methodology is promising for diagnostics and evaluation of treatment efficacy in BC.
topic breast cancer diagnosis
fine‐needle aspiration
protein biomarker
proximity extension assay
url https://doi.org/10.1002/1878-0261.12350
work_keys_str_mv AT bofranzen afineneedleaspirationbasedproteinsignaturediscriminatesbenignfrommalignantbreastlesions
AT masoodkamalimoghaddam afineneedleaspirationbasedproteinsignaturediscriminatesbenignfrommalignantbreastlesions
AT andreyalexeyenko afineneedleaspirationbasedproteinsignaturediscriminatesbenignfrommalignantbreastlesions
AT thomashatschek afineneedleaspirationbasedproteinsignaturediscriminatesbenignfrommalignantbreastlesions
AT susannebecker afineneedleaspirationbasedproteinsignaturediscriminatesbenignfrommalignantbreastlesions
AT lottawik afineneedleaspirationbasedproteinsignaturediscriminatesbenignfrommalignantbreastlesions
AT jonaskierkegaard afineneedleaspirationbasedproteinsignaturediscriminatesbenignfrommalignantbreastlesions
AT annikaeriksson afineneedleaspirationbasedproteinsignaturediscriminatesbenignfrommalignantbreastlesions
AT naveenrmuppani afineneedleaspirationbasedproteinsignaturediscriminatesbenignfrommalignantbreastlesions
AT gertauer afineneedleaspirationbasedproteinsignaturediscriminatesbenignfrommalignantbreastlesions
AT ulflandegren afineneedleaspirationbasedproteinsignaturediscriminatesbenignfrommalignantbreastlesions
AT rolflewensohn afineneedleaspirationbasedproteinsignaturediscriminatesbenignfrommalignantbreastlesions
AT bofranzen fineneedleaspirationbasedproteinsignaturediscriminatesbenignfrommalignantbreastlesions
AT masoodkamalimoghaddam fineneedleaspirationbasedproteinsignaturediscriminatesbenignfrommalignantbreastlesions
AT andreyalexeyenko fineneedleaspirationbasedproteinsignaturediscriminatesbenignfrommalignantbreastlesions
AT thomashatschek fineneedleaspirationbasedproteinsignaturediscriminatesbenignfrommalignantbreastlesions
AT susannebecker fineneedleaspirationbasedproteinsignaturediscriminatesbenignfrommalignantbreastlesions
AT lottawik fineneedleaspirationbasedproteinsignaturediscriminatesbenignfrommalignantbreastlesions
AT jonaskierkegaard fineneedleaspirationbasedproteinsignaturediscriminatesbenignfrommalignantbreastlesions
AT annikaeriksson fineneedleaspirationbasedproteinsignaturediscriminatesbenignfrommalignantbreastlesions
AT naveenrmuppani fineneedleaspirationbasedproteinsignaturediscriminatesbenignfrommalignantbreastlesions
AT gertauer fineneedleaspirationbasedproteinsignaturediscriminatesbenignfrommalignantbreastlesions
AT ulflandegren fineneedleaspirationbasedproteinsignaturediscriminatesbenignfrommalignantbreastlesions
AT rolflewensohn fineneedleaspirationbasedproteinsignaturediscriminatesbenignfrommalignantbreastlesions
_version_ 1724463202711896064