Interactive effects of English-speaking anxiety and strategy use on oral English test performance of high- and low-proficient Chinese university EFL learners

This study investigated the interactive effects of English-speaking anxiety and strategy use on oral English test performance of high- and low-proficient Chinese university EFL learners. In total, 1092 first-year undergraduates answered the English-speaking Anxiety Scale (ESAS), the Oral Communicati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Meihua Liu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2018-01-01
Series:Cogent Education
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1562410
id doaj-802417e74459429b9abd6a6c95b3f244
record_format Article
spelling doaj-802417e74459429b9abd6a6c95b3f2442021-08-24T14:41:02ZengTaylor & Francis GroupCogent Education2331-186X2018-01-015110.1080/2331186X.2018.15624101562410Interactive effects of English-speaking anxiety and strategy use on oral English test performance of high- and low-proficient Chinese university EFL learnersMeihua Liu0Tsinghua UniversityThis study investigated the interactive effects of English-speaking anxiety and strategy use on oral English test performance of high- and low-proficient Chinese university EFL learners. In total, 1092 first-year undergraduates answered the English-speaking Anxiety Scale (ESAS), the Oral Communication Strategy Inventory (OCSI) and other questionnaires, and took the English-speaking test. Based on test scores, data gathered from 178 low- and 214 high-proficient students were used in the study. The results were: (1) the low-proficient students were significantly more apprehensive of negative evaluation and speech communication than their high-proficient counterparts. Meanwhile, they deployed social affective, fluency-oriented, meaning-negotiating, and message reduction and alteration strategies significantly less frequently while message abandonment strategies, nonverbal strategies and strategies of attempting to think in English significantly more often; (2) ESAS and OCSI scales were significantly interrelated for both groups, and (3) both ESAS and OCSI were good predictors for English-speaking test performance for both groups.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1562410speaking anxietystrategy useeffectproficiencytest performance
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Meihua Liu
spellingShingle Meihua Liu
Interactive effects of English-speaking anxiety and strategy use on oral English test performance of high- and low-proficient Chinese university EFL learners
Cogent Education
speaking anxiety
strategy use
effect
proficiency
test performance
author_facet Meihua Liu
author_sort Meihua Liu
title Interactive effects of English-speaking anxiety and strategy use on oral English test performance of high- and low-proficient Chinese university EFL learners
title_short Interactive effects of English-speaking anxiety and strategy use on oral English test performance of high- and low-proficient Chinese university EFL learners
title_full Interactive effects of English-speaking anxiety and strategy use on oral English test performance of high- and low-proficient Chinese university EFL learners
title_fullStr Interactive effects of English-speaking anxiety and strategy use on oral English test performance of high- and low-proficient Chinese university EFL learners
title_full_unstemmed Interactive effects of English-speaking anxiety and strategy use on oral English test performance of high- and low-proficient Chinese university EFL learners
title_sort interactive effects of english-speaking anxiety and strategy use on oral english test performance of high- and low-proficient chinese university efl learners
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Cogent Education
issn 2331-186X
publishDate 2018-01-01
description This study investigated the interactive effects of English-speaking anxiety and strategy use on oral English test performance of high- and low-proficient Chinese university EFL learners. In total, 1092 first-year undergraduates answered the English-speaking Anxiety Scale (ESAS), the Oral Communication Strategy Inventory (OCSI) and other questionnaires, and took the English-speaking test. Based on test scores, data gathered from 178 low- and 214 high-proficient students were used in the study. The results were: (1) the low-proficient students were significantly more apprehensive of negative evaluation and speech communication than their high-proficient counterparts. Meanwhile, they deployed social affective, fluency-oriented, meaning-negotiating, and message reduction and alteration strategies significantly less frequently while message abandonment strategies, nonverbal strategies and strategies of attempting to think in English significantly more often; (2) ESAS and OCSI scales were significantly interrelated for both groups, and (3) both ESAS and OCSI were good predictors for English-speaking test performance for both groups.
topic speaking anxiety
strategy use
effect
proficiency
test performance
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1562410
work_keys_str_mv AT meihualiu interactiveeffectsofenglishspeakinganxietyandstrategyuseonoralenglishtestperformanceofhighandlowproficientchineseuniversityefllearners
_version_ 1721197378394914816