Special Issue: Aspects of Game Theory and Institutional Economics

Classical economists from Adam Smith to Thomas Malthus and to Karl Marx have considered the importance of direct interdependence and direct interactions for the economy. This was even more the case for original institutionalist thinkers such as Thorstein Veblen, John Commons, and Clarence Ayres. In...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wolfram Elsner, Torsten Heinrich, Henning Schwardt, Claudius Gräbner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2014-09-01
Series:Games
Subjects:
n/a
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4336/5/3/188
id doaj-8042bfaec2e14d418c471e15eabe4b84
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8042bfaec2e14d418c471e15eabe4b842020-11-24T20:54:31ZengMDPI AGGames2073-43362014-09-015318819010.3390/g5030188g5030188Special Issue: Aspects of Game Theory and Institutional EconomicsWolfram Elsner0Torsten Heinrich1Henning Schwardt2Claudius Gräbner3Structural Research and Policy Division, (iino) Institute for Institutional and Innovation Economics, Department of Business Studies and Economics, University of Bremen, Hochschulring 4, D-28359 Bremen, GermanyStructural Research and Policy Division, (iino) Institute for Institutional and Innovation Economics, Department of Business Studies and Economics, University of Bremen, Hochschulring 4, D-28359 Bremen, GermanyStructural Research and Policy Division, (iino) Institute for Institutional and Innovation Economics, Department of Business Studies and Economics, University of Bremen, Hochschulring 4, D-28359 Bremen, GermanyStructural Research and Policy Division, (iino) Institute for Institutional and Innovation Economics, Department of Business Studies and Economics, University of Bremen, Hochschulring 4, D-28359 Bremen, GermanyClassical economists from Adam Smith to Thomas Malthus and to Karl Marx have considered the importance of direct interdependence and direct interactions for the economy. This was even more the case for original institutionalist thinkers such as Thorstein Veblen, John Commons, and Clarence Ayres. In their writings, direct interdependence, interactions (or transactions) among agents, with all beneficial and with all problematic consequences, took center stage in economic analysis. Why, for instance, do people adhere to a particular new fashion or trend? Because others do, after eminent people, wealthy people, the “leisure class” (T. Veblen), have made it a symbol for status. The new fashion, however, ceases to serve as such a symbol once too many people follow it. The constant effort put into following trends and adopting fashion turns out to be a social dilemma, driven by Veblenian instincts, such as invidious distinction in predatory societies, conspicuous consumption and emulation. [...]http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4336/5/3/188n/a
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Wolfram Elsner
Torsten Heinrich
Henning Schwardt
Claudius Gräbner
spellingShingle Wolfram Elsner
Torsten Heinrich
Henning Schwardt
Claudius Gräbner
Special Issue: Aspects of Game Theory and Institutional Economics
Games
n/a
author_facet Wolfram Elsner
Torsten Heinrich
Henning Schwardt
Claudius Gräbner
author_sort Wolfram Elsner
title Special Issue: Aspects of Game Theory and Institutional Economics
title_short Special Issue: Aspects of Game Theory and Institutional Economics
title_full Special Issue: Aspects of Game Theory and Institutional Economics
title_fullStr Special Issue: Aspects of Game Theory and Institutional Economics
title_full_unstemmed Special Issue: Aspects of Game Theory and Institutional Economics
title_sort special issue: aspects of game theory and institutional economics
publisher MDPI AG
series Games
issn 2073-4336
publishDate 2014-09-01
description Classical economists from Adam Smith to Thomas Malthus and to Karl Marx have considered the importance of direct interdependence and direct interactions for the economy. This was even more the case for original institutionalist thinkers such as Thorstein Veblen, John Commons, and Clarence Ayres. In their writings, direct interdependence, interactions (or transactions) among agents, with all beneficial and with all problematic consequences, took center stage in economic analysis. Why, for instance, do people adhere to a particular new fashion or trend? Because others do, after eminent people, wealthy people, the “leisure class” (T. Veblen), have made it a symbol for status. The new fashion, however, ceases to serve as such a symbol once too many people follow it. The constant effort put into following trends and adopting fashion turns out to be a social dilemma, driven by Veblenian instincts, such as invidious distinction in predatory societies, conspicuous consumption and emulation. [...]
topic n/a
url http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4336/5/3/188
work_keys_str_mv AT wolframelsner specialissueaspectsofgametheoryandinstitutionaleconomics
AT torstenheinrich specialissueaspectsofgametheoryandinstitutionaleconomics
AT henningschwardt specialissueaspectsofgametheoryandinstitutionaleconomics
AT claudiusgrabner specialissueaspectsofgametheoryandinstitutionaleconomics
_version_ 1716794283604836352