Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation with Autogenous Bone Graft Compared with a Composite Grafting Material or Bone Substitute Alone: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Assessing Volumetric Stability of the Grafting Material

Objectives: Test the hypothesis of no difference in the volumetric stability of the grafting material following maxillary sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone graft compared with composite grafting material or bone substitute alone applying the lateral window technique. Material and Meth...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thomas Starch-Jensen, Daniel Deluiz, Julie Vitenson, Niels Henrik Bruun, Eduardo Muniz Barretto Tinoco
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Stilus Optimus 2021-03-01
Series:eJournal of Oral Maxillofacial Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ejomr.org/JOMR/archives/2021/1/e1/v12n1e1ht.htm
id doaj-80583646ad2d460ba562884724c70bed
record_format Article
spelling doaj-80583646ad2d460ba562884724c70bed2021-05-12T05:44:48ZengStilus OptimuseJournal of Oral Maxillofacial Research2029-283X2021-03-01121e110.5037/jomr.2021.12101Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation with Autogenous Bone Graft Compared with a Composite Grafting Material or Bone Substitute Alone: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Assessing Volumetric Stability of the Grafting MaterialThomas Starch-JensenDaniel DeluizJulie VitensonNiels Henrik BruunEduardo Muniz Barretto TinocoObjectives: Test the hypothesis of no difference in the volumetric stability of the grafting material following maxillary sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone graft compared with composite grafting material or bone substitute alone applying the lateral window technique. Material and Methods: MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Cochrane library and hand-search of relevant journals were conducted. Human studies published in English until the 9th of October 2020 were included. Outcome measures included three-dimensional volumetric changes of the grafting material and potential predictive parameters. Volumetric changes were evaluated by descriptive statistics and meta-analysis including 95% confidence interval. Results: Electronic search and hand-searching resulted in 102 entries. Four randomized controlled trials with unclear risk of bias fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The volumetric stability of the grafting material was significantly improved by mixing autogenous bone graft with a non-resorbable xenograft compared with autogenous bone graft. Meta-analyses assessing absolute and relative volumetric changes demonstrated no significant differences between autogenous bone graft compared with allogeneic bone graft, synthetic biomaterials combined with autogenous bone graft or used alone. Association between volumetric changes of the grafting material and potential predictive parameters were not assessed in the included studies. Conclusions: Volumetric reduction of the augmented area seems inevitable following maxillary sinus floor augmentation regardless of the grafting material. The volumetric stability of autogenous bone graft is improved with addition of xenograft compared with autogenous bone graft. However, conclusions drawn from this systematic review should be interpreted with caution since only four studies using three-dimensional radiographic measurements were included. https://www.ejomr.org/JOMR/archives/2021/1/e1/v12n1e1ht.htmalveolar ridge augmentationdental implantsoral surgical proceduresreviewsinus floor augmentation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Thomas Starch-Jensen
Daniel Deluiz
Julie Vitenson
Niels Henrik Bruun
Eduardo Muniz Barretto Tinoco
spellingShingle Thomas Starch-Jensen
Daniel Deluiz
Julie Vitenson
Niels Henrik Bruun
Eduardo Muniz Barretto Tinoco
Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation with Autogenous Bone Graft Compared with a Composite Grafting Material or Bone Substitute Alone: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Assessing Volumetric Stability of the Grafting Material
eJournal of Oral Maxillofacial Research
alveolar ridge augmentation
dental implants
oral surgical procedures
review
sinus floor augmentation
author_facet Thomas Starch-Jensen
Daniel Deluiz
Julie Vitenson
Niels Henrik Bruun
Eduardo Muniz Barretto Tinoco
author_sort Thomas Starch-Jensen
title Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation with Autogenous Bone Graft Compared with a Composite Grafting Material or Bone Substitute Alone: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Assessing Volumetric Stability of the Grafting Material
title_short Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation with Autogenous Bone Graft Compared with a Composite Grafting Material or Bone Substitute Alone: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Assessing Volumetric Stability of the Grafting Material
title_full Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation with Autogenous Bone Graft Compared with a Composite Grafting Material or Bone Substitute Alone: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Assessing Volumetric Stability of the Grafting Material
title_fullStr Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation with Autogenous Bone Graft Compared with a Composite Grafting Material or Bone Substitute Alone: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Assessing Volumetric Stability of the Grafting Material
title_full_unstemmed Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation with Autogenous Bone Graft Compared with a Composite Grafting Material or Bone Substitute Alone: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Assessing Volumetric Stability of the Grafting Material
title_sort maxillary sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone graft compared with a composite grafting material or bone substitute alone: a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing volumetric stability of the grafting material
publisher Stilus Optimus
series eJournal of Oral Maxillofacial Research
issn 2029-283X
publishDate 2021-03-01
description Objectives: Test the hypothesis of no difference in the volumetric stability of the grafting material following maxillary sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone graft compared with composite grafting material or bone substitute alone applying the lateral window technique. Material and Methods: MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Cochrane library and hand-search of relevant journals were conducted. Human studies published in English until the 9th of October 2020 were included. Outcome measures included three-dimensional volumetric changes of the grafting material and potential predictive parameters. Volumetric changes were evaluated by descriptive statistics and meta-analysis including 95% confidence interval. Results: Electronic search and hand-searching resulted in 102 entries. Four randomized controlled trials with unclear risk of bias fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The volumetric stability of the grafting material was significantly improved by mixing autogenous bone graft with a non-resorbable xenograft compared with autogenous bone graft. Meta-analyses assessing absolute and relative volumetric changes demonstrated no significant differences between autogenous bone graft compared with allogeneic bone graft, synthetic biomaterials combined with autogenous bone graft or used alone. Association between volumetric changes of the grafting material and potential predictive parameters were not assessed in the included studies. Conclusions: Volumetric reduction of the augmented area seems inevitable following maxillary sinus floor augmentation regardless of the grafting material. The volumetric stability of autogenous bone graft is improved with addition of xenograft compared with autogenous bone graft. However, conclusions drawn from this systematic review should be interpreted with caution since only four studies using three-dimensional radiographic measurements were included.
topic alveolar ridge augmentation
dental implants
oral surgical procedures
review
sinus floor augmentation
url https://www.ejomr.org/JOMR/archives/2021/1/e1/v12n1e1ht.htm
work_keys_str_mv AT thomasstarchjensen maxillarysinusflooraugmentationwithautogenousbonegraftcomparedwithacompositegraftingmaterialorbonesubstitutealoneasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisassessingvolumetricstabilityofthegraftingmaterial
AT danieldeluiz maxillarysinusflooraugmentationwithautogenousbonegraftcomparedwithacompositegraftingmaterialorbonesubstitutealoneasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisassessingvolumetricstabilityofthegraftingmaterial
AT julievitenson maxillarysinusflooraugmentationwithautogenousbonegraftcomparedwithacompositegraftingmaterialorbonesubstitutealoneasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisassessingvolumetricstabilityofthegraftingmaterial
AT nielshenrikbruun maxillarysinusflooraugmentationwithautogenousbonegraftcomparedwithacompositegraftingmaterialorbonesubstitutealoneasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisassessingvolumetricstabilityofthegraftingmaterial
AT eduardomunizbarrettotinoco maxillarysinusflooraugmentationwithautogenousbonegraftcomparedwithacompositegraftingmaterialorbonesubstitutealoneasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisassessingvolumetricstabilityofthegraftingmaterial
_version_ 1721443414674767872