Aggression and discrimination among closely versus distantly related species of Drosophila
Fighting between different species is widespread in the animal kingdom, yet this phenomenon has been relatively understudied in the field of aggression research. Particularly lacking are studies that test the effect of genetic distance, or relatedness, on aggressive behaviour between species. Here w...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
The Royal Society
2019-06-01
|
Series: | Royal Society Open Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.190069 |
id |
doaj-805b984f3e5041d28467216a89a82698 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-805b984f3e5041d28467216a89a826982020-11-25T04:00:14ZengThe Royal SocietyRoyal Society Open Science2054-57032019-06-016610.1098/rsos.190069190069Aggression and discrimination among closely versus distantly related species of DrosophilaTarun GuptaSarah E. HoweMarlo L. ZormanBrent L. LockwoodFighting between different species is widespread in the animal kingdom, yet this phenomenon has been relatively understudied in the field of aggression research. Particularly lacking are studies that test the effect of genetic distance, or relatedness, on aggressive behaviour between species. Here we characterized male–male aggression within and between species of fruit flies across the Drosophila phylogeny. We show that male Drosophila discriminate between conspecifics and heterospecifics and show a bias for the target of aggression that depends on the genetic relatedness of opponent males. Specifically, males of closely related species treated conspecifics and heterospecifics equally, whereas males of distantly related species were overwhelmingly aggressive towards conspecifics. To our knowledge, this is the first study to quantify aggression between Drosophila species and to establish a behavioural bias for aggression against conspecifics versus heterospecifics. Our results suggest that future study of heterospecific aggression behaviour in Drosophila is warranted to investigate the degree to which these trends in aggression among species extend to broader behavioural, ecological and evolutionary contexts.https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.190069agonistic behaviourterritorialityheterospecific aggression |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Tarun Gupta Sarah E. Howe Marlo L. Zorman Brent L. Lockwood |
spellingShingle |
Tarun Gupta Sarah E. Howe Marlo L. Zorman Brent L. Lockwood Aggression and discrimination among closely versus distantly related species of Drosophila Royal Society Open Science agonistic behaviour territoriality heterospecific aggression |
author_facet |
Tarun Gupta Sarah E. Howe Marlo L. Zorman Brent L. Lockwood |
author_sort |
Tarun Gupta |
title |
Aggression and discrimination among closely versus distantly related species of Drosophila |
title_short |
Aggression and discrimination among closely versus distantly related species of Drosophila |
title_full |
Aggression and discrimination among closely versus distantly related species of Drosophila |
title_fullStr |
Aggression and discrimination among closely versus distantly related species of Drosophila |
title_full_unstemmed |
Aggression and discrimination among closely versus distantly related species of Drosophila |
title_sort |
aggression and discrimination among closely versus distantly related species of drosophila |
publisher |
The Royal Society |
series |
Royal Society Open Science |
issn |
2054-5703 |
publishDate |
2019-06-01 |
description |
Fighting between different species is widespread in the animal kingdom, yet this phenomenon has been relatively understudied in the field of aggression research. Particularly lacking are studies that test the effect of genetic distance, or relatedness, on aggressive behaviour between species. Here we characterized male–male aggression within and between species of fruit flies across the Drosophila phylogeny. We show that male Drosophila discriminate between conspecifics and heterospecifics and show a bias for the target of aggression that depends on the genetic relatedness of opponent males. Specifically, males of closely related species treated conspecifics and heterospecifics equally, whereas males of distantly related species were overwhelmingly aggressive towards conspecifics. To our knowledge, this is the first study to quantify aggression between Drosophila species and to establish a behavioural bias for aggression against conspecifics versus heterospecifics. Our results suggest that future study of heterospecific aggression behaviour in Drosophila is warranted to investigate the degree to which these trends in aggression among species extend to broader behavioural, ecological and evolutionary contexts. |
topic |
agonistic behaviour territoriality heterospecific aggression |
url |
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.190069 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT tarungupta aggressionanddiscriminationamongcloselyversusdistantlyrelatedspeciesofdrosophila AT sarahehowe aggressionanddiscriminationamongcloselyversusdistantlyrelatedspeciesofdrosophila AT marlolzorman aggressionanddiscriminationamongcloselyversusdistantlyrelatedspeciesofdrosophila AT brentllockwood aggressionanddiscriminationamongcloselyversusdistantlyrelatedspeciesofdrosophila |
_version_ |
1724451729184915456 |