Aggression and discrimination among closely versus distantly related species of Drosophila

Fighting between different species is widespread in the animal kingdom, yet this phenomenon has been relatively understudied in the field of aggression research. Particularly lacking are studies that test the effect of genetic distance, or relatedness, on aggressive behaviour between species. Here w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tarun Gupta, Sarah E. Howe, Marlo L. Zorman, Brent L. Lockwood
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Royal Society 2019-06-01
Series:Royal Society Open Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.190069
id doaj-805b984f3e5041d28467216a89a82698
record_format Article
spelling doaj-805b984f3e5041d28467216a89a826982020-11-25T04:00:14ZengThe Royal SocietyRoyal Society Open Science2054-57032019-06-016610.1098/rsos.190069190069Aggression and discrimination among closely versus distantly related species of DrosophilaTarun GuptaSarah E. HoweMarlo L. ZormanBrent L. LockwoodFighting between different species is widespread in the animal kingdom, yet this phenomenon has been relatively understudied in the field of aggression research. Particularly lacking are studies that test the effect of genetic distance, or relatedness, on aggressive behaviour between species. Here we characterized male–male aggression within and between species of fruit flies across the Drosophila phylogeny. We show that male Drosophila discriminate between conspecifics and heterospecifics and show a bias for the target of aggression that depends on the genetic relatedness of opponent males. Specifically, males of closely related species treated conspecifics and heterospecifics equally, whereas males of distantly related species were overwhelmingly aggressive towards conspecifics. To our knowledge, this is the first study to quantify aggression between Drosophila species and to establish a behavioural bias for aggression against conspecifics versus heterospecifics. Our results suggest that future study of heterospecific aggression behaviour in Drosophila is warranted to investigate the degree to which these trends in aggression among species extend to broader behavioural, ecological and evolutionary contexts.https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.190069agonistic behaviourterritorialityheterospecific aggression
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tarun Gupta
Sarah E. Howe
Marlo L. Zorman
Brent L. Lockwood
spellingShingle Tarun Gupta
Sarah E. Howe
Marlo L. Zorman
Brent L. Lockwood
Aggression and discrimination among closely versus distantly related species of Drosophila
Royal Society Open Science
agonistic behaviour
territoriality
heterospecific aggression
author_facet Tarun Gupta
Sarah E. Howe
Marlo L. Zorman
Brent L. Lockwood
author_sort Tarun Gupta
title Aggression and discrimination among closely versus distantly related species of Drosophila
title_short Aggression and discrimination among closely versus distantly related species of Drosophila
title_full Aggression and discrimination among closely versus distantly related species of Drosophila
title_fullStr Aggression and discrimination among closely versus distantly related species of Drosophila
title_full_unstemmed Aggression and discrimination among closely versus distantly related species of Drosophila
title_sort aggression and discrimination among closely versus distantly related species of drosophila
publisher The Royal Society
series Royal Society Open Science
issn 2054-5703
publishDate 2019-06-01
description Fighting between different species is widespread in the animal kingdom, yet this phenomenon has been relatively understudied in the field of aggression research. Particularly lacking are studies that test the effect of genetic distance, or relatedness, on aggressive behaviour between species. Here we characterized male–male aggression within and between species of fruit flies across the Drosophila phylogeny. We show that male Drosophila discriminate between conspecifics and heterospecifics and show a bias for the target of aggression that depends on the genetic relatedness of opponent males. Specifically, males of closely related species treated conspecifics and heterospecifics equally, whereas males of distantly related species were overwhelmingly aggressive towards conspecifics. To our knowledge, this is the first study to quantify aggression between Drosophila species and to establish a behavioural bias for aggression against conspecifics versus heterospecifics. Our results suggest that future study of heterospecific aggression behaviour in Drosophila is warranted to investigate the degree to which these trends in aggression among species extend to broader behavioural, ecological and evolutionary contexts.
topic agonistic behaviour
territoriality
heterospecific aggression
url https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.190069
work_keys_str_mv AT tarungupta aggressionanddiscriminationamongcloselyversusdistantlyrelatedspeciesofdrosophila
AT sarahehowe aggressionanddiscriminationamongcloselyversusdistantlyrelatedspeciesofdrosophila
AT marlolzorman aggressionanddiscriminationamongcloselyversusdistantlyrelatedspeciesofdrosophila
AT brentllockwood aggressionanddiscriminationamongcloselyversusdistantlyrelatedspeciesofdrosophila
_version_ 1724451729184915456