Sixty-Five Years of Auditing Europe

This article surveys the evolution of multi-level audit governance in the European Union. It traces sixty-five years of financial control, from the work of a single auditor at the European Coal and Steel Community (1952) to the creation of the Audit Board of the European Communities (1959-1977), and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Paul J Stephenson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: UACES 2016-01-01
Series:Journal of Contemporary European Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.jcer.net/index.php/jcer/article/view/691
id doaj-806dc8c922d447a6a35151425fb373b4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-806dc8c922d447a6a35151425fb373b42020-11-24T21:45:59ZengUACESJournal of Contemporary European Research1815-347X2016-01-01121691Sixty-Five Years of Auditing EuropePaul J Stephenson0Maastricht UniversityThis article surveys the evolution of multi-level audit governance in the European Union. It traces sixty-five years of financial control, from the work of a single auditor at the European Coal and Steel Community (1952) to the creation of the Audit Board of the European Communities (1959-1977), and from the establishment of an independent European Court of Auditors (1977) to audit the newly established EU budget, to the setting up of a European Anti-Fraud Office (1999). The article addresses the challenges of securing effective cooperation between audit bodies at the national and supranational level. It also analyses how the Community’s external auditor started to ‘hold to account’ EU policies and traces the tensions and inter-institutional conflict that arose between the Court and the Commission and Council. Using an analytical approach set out by Tömmel (2016) that recognises different ‘modes of governance’, it identifies the main phases and turning points that have shaped audit governance. It shows how the audit task has changed since the Maastricht Treaty, and considers the way the Court works to identify error and fraud in budgetary spending, acknowledging the challenges of shared implementation for policies financed by the budget. The latter part of the article addresses current institutional reform and innovation. It examines the dilemma for audit governance brought by the Eurozone financial crisis and the emergence of new tools and mechanisms paid for by taxpayer money beyond the EU budget.https://www.jcer.net/index.php/jcer/article/view/691AccountabilityEU budgetEuropean Court of AuditorsEvaluationFraudImplementation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Paul J Stephenson
spellingShingle Paul J Stephenson
Sixty-Five Years of Auditing Europe
Journal of Contemporary European Research
Accountability
EU budget
European Court of Auditors
Evaluation
Fraud
Implementation
author_facet Paul J Stephenson
author_sort Paul J Stephenson
title Sixty-Five Years of Auditing Europe
title_short Sixty-Five Years of Auditing Europe
title_full Sixty-Five Years of Auditing Europe
title_fullStr Sixty-Five Years of Auditing Europe
title_full_unstemmed Sixty-Five Years of Auditing Europe
title_sort sixty-five years of auditing europe
publisher UACES
series Journal of Contemporary European Research
issn 1815-347X
publishDate 2016-01-01
description This article surveys the evolution of multi-level audit governance in the European Union. It traces sixty-five years of financial control, from the work of a single auditor at the European Coal and Steel Community (1952) to the creation of the Audit Board of the European Communities (1959-1977), and from the establishment of an independent European Court of Auditors (1977) to audit the newly established EU budget, to the setting up of a European Anti-Fraud Office (1999). The article addresses the challenges of securing effective cooperation between audit bodies at the national and supranational level. It also analyses how the Community’s external auditor started to ‘hold to account’ EU policies and traces the tensions and inter-institutional conflict that arose between the Court and the Commission and Council. Using an analytical approach set out by Tömmel (2016) that recognises different ‘modes of governance’, it identifies the main phases and turning points that have shaped audit governance. It shows how the audit task has changed since the Maastricht Treaty, and considers the way the Court works to identify error and fraud in budgetary spending, acknowledging the challenges of shared implementation for policies financed by the budget. The latter part of the article addresses current institutional reform and innovation. It examines the dilemma for audit governance brought by the Eurozone financial crisis and the emergence of new tools and mechanisms paid for by taxpayer money beyond the EU budget.
topic Accountability
EU budget
European Court of Auditors
Evaluation
Fraud
Implementation
url https://www.jcer.net/index.php/jcer/article/view/691
work_keys_str_mv AT pauljstephenson sixtyfiveyearsofauditingeurope
_version_ 1725902802157305856