The Cox model is better than the Fine and Gray model when estimating relative revision risks from arthroplasty register data
Background and purpose — Analysis of the revision-free survival of knee and hip prostheses has traditionally been performed using Kaplan–Meier analysis and Cox regression. The competing risk problem that is related to patients who die during follow-up has recently been increasingly discussed, not le...
Main Authors: | Jonas Ranstam, Otto Robertsson |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2017-11-01
|
Series: | Acta Orthopaedica |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2017.1361130 |
Similar Items
-
No bias of ignored bilaterality when analysing the revision risk of knee prostheses: Analysis of a population based sample of 44,590 patients with 55,298 knee prostheses from the national Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register
by: Ranstam Jonas, et al.
Published: (2003-02-01) -
Weight and height separated provide better understanding than BMI on the risk of revision after total knee arthroplasty: report of 107,228 primary total knee arthroplasties from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register 2009–2017
by: Erdem A Sezgin, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01) -
Higher risk of revision for infection using systemic clindamycin prophylaxis than with cloxacillin: A report from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register on 78,000 primary total knee arthroplasties for osteoarthritis
by: Otto Robertsson, et al.
Published: (2017-09-01) -
Outcome of revision hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 55 years: an analysis of 1,037 revisions in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register
by: Martijn F L Kuijpers, et al.
Published: (2020-03-01) -
Bariatric surgery prior to total knee arthroplasty is not associated with lower risk of revision: a register-based study of 441 patients
by: Perna Ighani Arani, et al.
Published: (2020-11-01)