Dysglycemia risk score in Saudi Arabia: A tool to identify people at high future risk of developing type 2 diabetes

Abstract Aims/Introduction To develop a non‐invasive risk score to identify Saudis having prediabetes or undiagnosed type 2 diabetes. Methods Adult Saudis without diabetes were recruited randomly using a stratified two‐stage cluster sampling method. Demographic, dietary, lifestyle variables, persona...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Suhad Bahijri, Rajaa Al‐Raddadi, Ghada Ajabnoor, Hanan Jambi, Jawaher Al Ahmadi, Anwar Borai, Noël C Barengo, Jaakko Tuomilehto
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-07-01
Series:Journal of Diabetes Investigation
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/jdi.13213
Description
Summary:Abstract Aims/Introduction To develop a non‐invasive risk score to identify Saudis having prediabetes or undiagnosed type 2 diabetes. Methods Adult Saudis without diabetes were recruited randomly using a stratified two‐stage cluster sampling method. Demographic, dietary, lifestyle variables, personal and family medical history were collected using a questionnaire. Blood pressure and anthropometric measurements were taken. Body mass index was calculated. The 1‐h oral glucose tolerance test was carried out. Glycated hemoglobin, fasting and 1‐h plasma glucose were measured, and obtained values were used to define prediabetes and type 2 diabetes (dysglycemia). Logistic regression models were used for assessing the association between various factors and dysglycemia, and Hosmer–Lemeshow summary statistics were used to assess the goodness‐of‐fit. Results A total of 791 men and 612 women were included, of whom 69 were found to have diabetes, and 259 had prediabetes. The prevalence of dysglycemia was 23%, increasing with age, reaching 71% in adults aged ≥65 years. In univariate analysis age, body mass index, waist circumference, use of antihypertensive medication, history of hyperglycemia, low physical activity, short sleep and family history of diabetes were statistically significant. The final model for the Saudi Diabetes Risk Score constituted sex, age, waist circumference, history of hyperglycemia and family history of diabetes, with the score ranging from 0 to 15. Its fit based on assessment using the receiver operating characteristic curve was good, with an area under the curve of 0.76 (95% confidence interval 0.73–0.79). The proposed cut‐point for dysglycemia is 5 or 6, with sensitivity and specificity being approximately 0.7. Conclusion The Saudi Diabetes Risk Score is a simple tool that can effectively distinguish Saudis at high risk of dysglycemia.
ISSN:2040-1116
2040-1124