Evaluation of Renal Allograft Biopsies for Graft Dysfunction and Relevance of C4d Staining in Antibody Mediated Rejection

Introduction: Biopsy remains gold standard for diagnosis of Graft Dysfunction (GD). It guides clinical management, provides valuable insights into pathogenesis of early and late allograft injury and is indispensable for distinguishing rejection from nonrejection causes of GD. Aim: The primary ai...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Clement Wilfred Devadass, Aruna Vishwanth Vanikar, Lovelesh Kumar Nigam, Kamal Vinod Kanodia, Rashmi Dalsukhbhai Patel, Kyasakkala Sannaboraiah Vinay, Himanshu V Patel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited 2016-03-01
Series:Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/7433/16339_CE[Ra1]_F(GH)_PF1(Ro_Om)_PFA(AK)_PF2(PAG).pdf
id doaj-80a710c3bc5f41c2b6398cbfaaf5ed43
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Clement Wilfred Devadass
Aruna Vishwanth Vanikar
Lovelesh Kumar Nigam
Kamal Vinod Kanodia
Rashmi Dalsukhbhai Patel
Kyasakkala Sannaboraiah Vinay
Himanshu V Patel
spellingShingle Clement Wilfred Devadass
Aruna Vishwanth Vanikar
Lovelesh Kumar Nigam
Kamal Vinod Kanodia
Rashmi Dalsukhbhai Patel
Kyasakkala Sannaboraiah Vinay
Himanshu V Patel
Evaluation of Renal Allograft Biopsies for Graft Dysfunction and Relevance of C4d Staining in Antibody Mediated Rejection
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
cni toxicity
peritubular capillary c4d deposition
renal biopsy
renal transplantation
author_facet Clement Wilfred Devadass
Aruna Vishwanth Vanikar
Lovelesh Kumar Nigam
Kamal Vinod Kanodia
Rashmi Dalsukhbhai Patel
Kyasakkala Sannaboraiah Vinay
Himanshu V Patel
author_sort Clement Wilfred Devadass
title Evaluation of Renal Allograft Biopsies for Graft Dysfunction and Relevance of C4d Staining in Antibody Mediated Rejection
title_short Evaluation of Renal Allograft Biopsies for Graft Dysfunction and Relevance of C4d Staining in Antibody Mediated Rejection
title_full Evaluation of Renal Allograft Biopsies for Graft Dysfunction and Relevance of C4d Staining in Antibody Mediated Rejection
title_fullStr Evaluation of Renal Allograft Biopsies for Graft Dysfunction and Relevance of C4d Staining in Antibody Mediated Rejection
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Renal Allograft Biopsies for Graft Dysfunction and Relevance of C4d Staining in Antibody Mediated Rejection
title_sort evaluation of renal allograft biopsies for graft dysfunction and relevance of c4d staining in antibody mediated rejection
publisher JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited
series Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
issn 2249-782X
0973-709X
publishDate 2016-03-01
description Introduction: Biopsy remains gold standard for diagnosis of Graft Dysfunction (GD). It guides clinical management, provides valuable insights into pathogenesis of early and late allograft injury and is indispensable for distinguishing rejection from nonrejection causes of GD. Aim: The primary aim of the study was to evaluate the diverse histomorphological lesions in renal allograft biopsy (RAB). Further, we determined the frequency of peritubular capillary (PTC) C4d positivity and its correlation with microvascular inflammation in Antibody Mediated Rejection (AMR). Materials and Methods: This was a prospective study on RAB over a period of 2 months. Histopathological evaluation was undertaken as per revised Banff’13 schema. Immunohistochemistry was performed to detect PTC C4d deposition. Results: Sixty five diagnostic biopsies were evaluated. Mean patient age was 34 years and males were predominant. The time interval between graft biopsy and transplantation ranged from 5 days to 8 years, with 52.3% biopsies belonging to period of ≤ 6 months post-transplant. Immune injuries were observed in 40 biopsies out of which AMR was observed in 35 biopsies. Calcineurin inhibitor toxicity (CNI Toxicity) was the second commonest cause observed in 12 biopsies and other lesions including de novo glomerulopathies were observed in the remaining biopsies. The sensitivity of C4d in detecting acute AMR was 55% and chronic AMR was 23.5% Conclusion: AMR and CNI Toxicity account for majority of graft dysfunction. C4d is not as sensitive a marker of AMR, as was initially thought. Higher proportion of moderate microvascular inflammation is found in diffuse C4d positive cases compared to focal C4d positive cases.
topic cni toxicity
peritubular capillary c4d deposition
renal biopsy
renal transplantation
url https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/7433/16339_CE[Ra1]_F(GH)_PF1(Ro_Om)_PFA(AK)_PF2(PAG).pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT clementwilfreddevadass evaluationofrenalallograftbiopsiesforgraftdysfunctionandrelevanceofc4dstaininginantibodymediatedrejection
AT arunavishwanthvanikar evaluationofrenalallograftbiopsiesforgraftdysfunctionandrelevanceofc4dstaininginantibodymediatedrejection
AT loveleshkumarnigam evaluationofrenalallograftbiopsiesforgraftdysfunctionandrelevanceofc4dstaininginantibodymediatedrejection
AT kamalvinodkanodia evaluationofrenalallograftbiopsiesforgraftdysfunctionandrelevanceofc4dstaininginantibodymediatedrejection
AT rashmidalsukhbhaipatel evaluationofrenalallograftbiopsiesforgraftdysfunctionandrelevanceofc4dstaininginantibodymediatedrejection
AT kyasakkalasannaboraiahvinay evaluationofrenalallograftbiopsiesforgraftdysfunctionandrelevanceofc4dstaininginantibodymediatedrejection
AT himanshuvpatel evaluationofrenalallograftbiopsiesforgraftdysfunctionandrelevanceofc4dstaininginantibodymediatedrejection
_version_ 1724690315556683776
spelling doaj-80a710c3bc5f41c2b6398cbfaaf5ed432020-11-25T03:02:18ZengJCDR Research and Publications Private LimitedJournal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research2249-782X0973-709X2016-03-01103EC11EC1510.7860/JCDR/2016/16339.7433Evaluation of Renal Allograft Biopsies for Graft Dysfunction and Relevance of C4d Staining in Antibody Mediated RejectionClement Wilfred Devadass0Aruna Vishwanth Vanikar1Lovelesh Kumar Nigam2Kamal Vinod Kanodia3Rashmi Dalsukhbhai Patel4Kyasakkala Sannaboraiah Vinay5Himanshu V Patel6Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, M.S Ramaiah Medical College and Hospitals, MSRIT Post, MSRNagar, Bangalore, India.ICMR Mentor and Guide, Professor & Head, Department of Pathology, Lab Medicine, Tranfusion Services & Immunohematology, Institute of Kidney Diseases and Research Centre & DR. H.L Trivedi Institute of Transplantation Sciences, B.J. Medical College & Civil Hospital Campus, Asarwa, Gujarat, India.Assistant Professor (Junior Nephropathologist), Department of Pathology, Lab Medicine, Tranfusion Services & Immunohematology, Institute of Kidney Diseases and Research Centre & DR. H.L Trivedi Institute of Transplantation Sciences, B.J. Medical College & Civil Hospital Campus, Asarwa, Gujarat, India.Professor (Senior Nephropathologist), Department of Pathology, Lab Medicine, Tranfusion Services & Immunohematology, Institute of Kidney Diseases and Research Centre & DR. H.L Trivedi Institute of Transplantation Sciences, B.J. Medical College & Civil Hospital Campus, Asarwa, Gujarat, India.Professor (Senior Nephropathologist), Department of Pathology, Lab Medicine, Tranfusion Services & Immunohematology, Institute of Kidney Diseases and Research Centre & DR. H.L Trivedi Institute of Transplantation Sciences, B.J. Medical College & Civil Hospital Campus, Asarwa, Gujarat, India.PDCC Fellow, Department of Pathology, Lab Medicine, Tranfusion Services & Immunohematology, Institute of Kidney Diseases and Research Centre & DR. H.L Trivedi Institute of Transplantation Sciences, B.J. Medical College & Civil Hospital Campus, Asarwa, Gujarat, India.Professor, Department of Nephrology, Institute of Kidney Diseases and Research Centre & DR. H.L Trivedi Institute of Transplantation Sciences, B.J. Medical College & Civil Hospital Campus, Asarwa, Gujarat, India.Introduction: Biopsy remains gold standard for diagnosis of Graft Dysfunction (GD). It guides clinical management, provides valuable insights into pathogenesis of early and late allograft injury and is indispensable for distinguishing rejection from nonrejection causes of GD. Aim: The primary aim of the study was to evaluate the diverse histomorphological lesions in renal allograft biopsy (RAB). Further, we determined the frequency of peritubular capillary (PTC) C4d positivity and its correlation with microvascular inflammation in Antibody Mediated Rejection (AMR). Materials and Methods: This was a prospective study on RAB over a period of 2 months. Histopathological evaluation was undertaken as per revised Banff’13 schema. Immunohistochemistry was performed to detect PTC C4d deposition. Results: Sixty five diagnostic biopsies were evaluated. Mean patient age was 34 years and males were predominant. The time interval between graft biopsy and transplantation ranged from 5 days to 8 years, with 52.3% biopsies belonging to period of ≤ 6 months post-transplant. Immune injuries were observed in 40 biopsies out of which AMR was observed in 35 biopsies. Calcineurin inhibitor toxicity (CNI Toxicity) was the second commonest cause observed in 12 biopsies and other lesions including de novo glomerulopathies were observed in the remaining biopsies. The sensitivity of C4d in detecting acute AMR was 55% and chronic AMR was 23.5% Conclusion: AMR and CNI Toxicity account for majority of graft dysfunction. C4d is not as sensitive a marker of AMR, as was initially thought. Higher proportion of moderate microvascular inflammation is found in diffuse C4d positive cases compared to focal C4d positive cases.https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/7433/16339_CE[Ra1]_F(GH)_PF1(Ro_Om)_PFA(AK)_PF2(PAG).pdfcni toxicityperitubular capillary c4d depositionrenal biopsyrenal transplantation