Conflicts of interest at medical journals: the influence of industry-supported randomised trials on journal impact factors and revenue - cohort study.

BACKGROUND: transparency in reporting of conflict of interest is an increasingly important aspect of publication in medical journals. Publication of large industry-supported trials may generate many citations and journal income through reprint sales and thereby be a source of conflicts of interest f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andreas Lundh, Marija Barbateskovic, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, Peter C Gøtzsche
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2010-10-01
Series:PLoS Medicine
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2964336?pdf=render
id doaj-80b6bac68d864f8c85f4b012261cc15d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-80b6bac68d864f8c85f4b012261cc15d2020-11-25T01:58:14ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Medicine1549-12771549-16762010-10-01710e100035410.1371/journal.pmed.1000354Conflicts of interest at medical journals: the influence of industry-supported randomised trials on journal impact factors and revenue - cohort study.Andreas LundhMarija BarbateskovicAsbjørn HróbjartssonPeter C GøtzscheBACKGROUND: transparency in reporting of conflict of interest is an increasingly important aspect of publication in medical journals. Publication of large industry-supported trials may generate many citations and journal income through reprint sales and thereby be a source of conflicts of interest for journals. We investigated industry-supported trials' influence on journal impact factors and revenue. METHODS AND FINDINGS: we sampled six major medical journals (Annals of Internal Medicine, Archives of Internal Medicine, BMJ, JAMA, The Lancet, and New England Journal of Medicine [NEJM]). For each journal, we identified randomised trials published in 1996-1997 and 2005-2006 using PubMed, and categorized the type of financial support. Using Web of Science, we investigated citations of industry-supported trials and the influence on journal impact factors over a ten-year period. We contacted journal editors and retrieved tax information on income from industry sources. The proportion of trials with sole industry support varied between journals, from 7% in BMJ to 32% in NEJM in 2005-2006. Industry-supported trials were more frequently cited than trials with other types of support, and omitting them from the impact factor calculation decreased journal impact factors. The decrease varied considerably between journals, with 1% for BMJ to 15% for NEJM in 2007. For the two journals disclosing data, income from the sales of reprints contributed to 3% and 41% of the total income for BMJ and The Lancet in 2005-2006. CONCLUSIONS: publication of industry-supported trials was associated with an increase in journal impact factors. Sales of reprints may provide a substantial income. We suggest that journals disclose financial information in the same way that they require them from their authors, so that readers can assess the potential effect of different types of papers on journals' revenue and impact.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2964336?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Andreas Lundh
Marija Barbateskovic
Asbjørn Hróbjartsson
Peter C Gøtzsche
spellingShingle Andreas Lundh
Marija Barbateskovic
Asbjørn Hróbjartsson
Peter C Gøtzsche
Conflicts of interest at medical journals: the influence of industry-supported randomised trials on journal impact factors and revenue - cohort study.
PLoS Medicine
author_facet Andreas Lundh
Marija Barbateskovic
Asbjørn Hróbjartsson
Peter C Gøtzsche
author_sort Andreas Lundh
title Conflicts of interest at medical journals: the influence of industry-supported randomised trials on journal impact factors and revenue - cohort study.
title_short Conflicts of interest at medical journals: the influence of industry-supported randomised trials on journal impact factors and revenue - cohort study.
title_full Conflicts of interest at medical journals: the influence of industry-supported randomised trials on journal impact factors and revenue - cohort study.
title_fullStr Conflicts of interest at medical journals: the influence of industry-supported randomised trials on journal impact factors and revenue - cohort study.
title_full_unstemmed Conflicts of interest at medical journals: the influence of industry-supported randomised trials on journal impact factors and revenue - cohort study.
title_sort conflicts of interest at medical journals: the influence of industry-supported randomised trials on journal impact factors and revenue - cohort study.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS Medicine
issn 1549-1277
1549-1676
publishDate 2010-10-01
description BACKGROUND: transparency in reporting of conflict of interest is an increasingly important aspect of publication in medical journals. Publication of large industry-supported trials may generate many citations and journal income through reprint sales and thereby be a source of conflicts of interest for journals. We investigated industry-supported trials' influence on journal impact factors and revenue. METHODS AND FINDINGS: we sampled six major medical journals (Annals of Internal Medicine, Archives of Internal Medicine, BMJ, JAMA, The Lancet, and New England Journal of Medicine [NEJM]). For each journal, we identified randomised trials published in 1996-1997 and 2005-2006 using PubMed, and categorized the type of financial support. Using Web of Science, we investigated citations of industry-supported trials and the influence on journal impact factors over a ten-year period. We contacted journal editors and retrieved tax information on income from industry sources. The proportion of trials with sole industry support varied between journals, from 7% in BMJ to 32% in NEJM in 2005-2006. Industry-supported trials were more frequently cited than trials with other types of support, and omitting them from the impact factor calculation decreased journal impact factors. The decrease varied considerably between journals, with 1% for BMJ to 15% for NEJM in 2007. For the two journals disclosing data, income from the sales of reprints contributed to 3% and 41% of the total income for BMJ and The Lancet in 2005-2006. CONCLUSIONS: publication of industry-supported trials was associated with an increase in journal impact factors. Sales of reprints may provide a substantial income. We suggest that journals disclose financial information in the same way that they require them from their authors, so that readers can assess the potential effect of different types of papers on journals' revenue and impact.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2964336?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT andreaslundh conflictsofinterestatmedicaljournalstheinfluenceofindustrysupportedrandomisedtrialsonjournalimpactfactorsandrevenuecohortstudy
AT marijabarbateskovic conflictsofinterestatmedicaljournalstheinfluenceofindustrysupportedrandomisedtrialsonjournalimpactfactorsandrevenuecohortstudy
AT asbjørnhrobjartsson conflictsofinterestatmedicaljournalstheinfluenceofindustrysupportedrandomisedtrialsonjournalimpactfactorsandrevenuecohortstudy
AT petercgøtzsche conflictsofinterestatmedicaljournalstheinfluenceofindustrysupportedrandomisedtrialsonjournalimpactfactorsandrevenuecohortstudy
_version_ 1724970720877871104