The missing metric: quantifying contributions of reviewers
The number of contributing reviewers often outnumbers the authors of publications. This has led to apathy towards reviewing and the conclusion that the peer-review system is broken. Given the trade-offs between submitting and reviewing manuscripts, reviewers and authors naturally want visibility for...
Main Authors: | Maurício Cantor, Shane Gero |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
The Royal Society
2015-01-01
|
Series: | Royal Society Open Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.140540 |
Similar Items
-
Clashing Concepts and Methods: Assessing Excellence in the Humanities and Social Sciences
by: Peter Scott
Published: (2015-02-01) -
The impact of peer review on the contribution potential of scientific papers
by: Akira Matsui, et al.
Published: (2021-09-01) -
External Tests of Peer Review Validity Via Impact Measures
by: Stephen A. Gallo, et al.
Published: (2018-08-01) -
Peer Review Regulation in the German Science and Research Association
by: E. Vodyanitskaya
Published: (2012-10-01) -
Early career researchers: observing how the new wave of researchers is changing the scholarly communications market
by: David Nicholas, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01)