Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM): a comparative study between Chagasic and idiopathic achalasia

Background and study aims Achalasia can be classified as either primary (idiopathic) achalasia or secondary achalasia, which is a consequence of another systemic disease. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is an effective and safe treatment for achalasia. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of POEM...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Galileu F.A. Farias, Diogo T.H. de Moura, Eduardo T.H. de Moura, Daniel T. de Rezende, Kelly E. Hathorn, Ary Nasi, Natália S.F. Queiroz, Eduardo G.H. de Moura
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2020-03-01
Series:Endoscopy International Open
Online Access:http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/a-1035-9288
id doaj-81b4d4012e88477cbe6e2af355e0d279
record_format Article
spelling doaj-81b4d4012e88477cbe6e2af355e0d2792020-11-25T03:16:23ZengGeorg Thieme Verlag KGEndoscopy International Open2364-37222196-97362020-03-010804E506E51210.1055/a-1035-9288Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM): a comparative study between Chagasic and idiopathic achalasiaGalileu F.A. Farias0Diogo T.H. de Moura1Eduardo T.H. de Moura2Daniel T. de Rezende3Kelly E. Hathorn4Ary Nasi5Natália S.F. Queiroz6Eduardo G.H. de Moura7Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, BrazilGastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, BrazilGastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, BrazilGastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, BrazilDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United StatesGastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, BrazilGastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, BrazilGastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, BrazilBackground and study aims Achalasia can be classified as either primary (idiopathic) achalasia or secondary achalasia, which is a consequence of another systemic disease. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is an effective and safe treatment for achalasia. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of POEM in patients with Chagasic achalasia compared to idiopathic achalasia. Patients and methods We evaluated POEM procedures performed at a single institution from November 2016 to January 2018. Demographic data, Eckardt score, lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure, body mass index, post-operative erosive esophagitis, adverse events, length of hospital stay, and procedure-related parameters were analyzed. Results Fifty-one patients underwent POEM as a treatment for achalasia in this period (20 patients with Chagasic and 31 with Idiopathic etiology). The overall clinical success rate was 92.1 %, with no statistical difference between groups (90 % in the Chagasic group vs. 93.5 % in the Idiopathic group, P = 0.640). Both groups had significant reduction in Eckardt score and in LES pressure, and increase in bodey mass index (BMI) at 1-year follow-up. There was no statistical difference between groups regarding Eckardt score (P = 0.439), LES pressure (p = 0.507), BMI (P = 0.254), post erosive esophagitis (35 % vs. 38.7 %, P = 0.789), adverse events (30 % vs. 12 %, P = 0.163,) length of hospital stay (3.75 days vs. 3.58 days, P = 0.622), and operative time (101.3 min vs. 99.1 min, P = 0.840). Conclusion POEM is an effective and safe treatment for patients with achalasia. There is no difference in POEM outcomes for those patients with Chagasic or Idiopathic achalasia.http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/a-1035-9288
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Galileu F.A. Farias
Diogo T.H. de Moura
Eduardo T.H. de Moura
Daniel T. de Rezende
Kelly E. Hathorn
Ary Nasi
Natália S.F. Queiroz
Eduardo G.H. de Moura
spellingShingle Galileu F.A. Farias
Diogo T.H. de Moura
Eduardo T.H. de Moura
Daniel T. de Rezende
Kelly E. Hathorn
Ary Nasi
Natália S.F. Queiroz
Eduardo G.H. de Moura
Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM): a comparative study between Chagasic and idiopathic achalasia
Endoscopy International Open
author_facet Galileu F.A. Farias
Diogo T.H. de Moura
Eduardo T.H. de Moura
Daniel T. de Rezende
Kelly E. Hathorn
Ary Nasi
Natália S.F. Queiroz
Eduardo G.H. de Moura
author_sort Galileu F.A. Farias
title Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM): a comparative study between Chagasic and idiopathic achalasia
title_short Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM): a comparative study between Chagasic and idiopathic achalasia
title_full Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM): a comparative study between Chagasic and idiopathic achalasia
title_fullStr Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM): a comparative study between Chagasic and idiopathic achalasia
title_full_unstemmed Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM): a comparative study between Chagasic and idiopathic achalasia
title_sort peroral endoscopic myotomy (poem): a comparative study between chagasic and idiopathic achalasia
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
series Endoscopy International Open
issn 2364-3722
2196-9736
publishDate 2020-03-01
description Background and study aims Achalasia can be classified as either primary (idiopathic) achalasia or secondary achalasia, which is a consequence of another systemic disease. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is an effective and safe treatment for achalasia. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of POEM in patients with Chagasic achalasia compared to idiopathic achalasia. Patients and methods We evaluated POEM procedures performed at a single institution from November 2016 to January 2018. Demographic data, Eckardt score, lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure, body mass index, post-operative erosive esophagitis, adverse events, length of hospital stay, and procedure-related parameters were analyzed. Results Fifty-one patients underwent POEM as a treatment for achalasia in this period (20 patients with Chagasic and 31 with Idiopathic etiology). The overall clinical success rate was 92.1 %, with no statistical difference between groups (90 % in the Chagasic group vs. 93.5 % in the Idiopathic group, P = 0.640). Both groups had significant reduction in Eckardt score and in LES pressure, and increase in bodey mass index (BMI) at 1-year follow-up. There was no statistical difference between groups regarding Eckardt score (P = 0.439), LES pressure (p = 0.507), BMI (P = 0.254), post erosive esophagitis (35 % vs. 38.7 %, P = 0.789), adverse events (30 % vs. 12 %, P = 0.163,) length of hospital stay (3.75 days vs. 3.58 days, P = 0.622), and operative time (101.3 min vs. 99.1 min, P = 0.840). Conclusion POEM is an effective and safe treatment for patients with achalasia. There is no difference in POEM outcomes for those patients with Chagasic or Idiopathic achalasia.
url http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/a-1035-9288
work_keys_str_mv AT galileufafarias peroralendoscopicmyotomypoemacomparativestudybetweenchagasicandidiopathicachalasia
AT diogothdemoura peroralendoscopicmyotomypoemacomparativestudybetweenchagasicandidiopathicachalasia
AT eduardothdemoura peroralendoscopicmyotomypoemacomparativestudybetweenchagasicandidiopathicachalasia
AT danieltderezende peroralendoscopicmyotomypoemacomparativestudybetweenchagasicandidiopathicachalasia
AT kellyehathorn peroralendoscopicmyotomypoemacomparativestudybetweenchagasicandidiopathicachalasia
AT arynasi peroralendoscopicmyotomypoemacomparativestudybetweenchagasicandidiopathicachalasia
AT nataliasfqueiroz peroralendoscopicmyotomypoemacomparativestudybetweenchagasicandidiopathicachalasia
AT eduardoghdemoura peroralendoscopicmyotomypoemacomparativestudybetweenchagasicandidiopathicachalasia
_version_ 1724636536542068736