Dynamic Mechanical Compression of Chondrocytes for Tissue Engineering: A Critical Review

Articular cartilage functions to transmit and translate loads. In a classical structure–function relationship, the tissue resides in a dynamic mechanical environment that drives the formation of a highly organized tissue architecture suited to its biomechanical role. The dynamic mechanical environme...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Devon E. Anderson, Brian Johnstone
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-12-01
Series:Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fbioe.2017.00076/full
id doaj-81df458faa7e444ca1061fab5e456c0f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-81df458faa7e444ca1061fab5e456c0f2020-11-24T21:15:54ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology2296-41852017-12-01510.3389/fbioe.2017.00076302287Dynamic Mechanical Compression of Chondrocytes for Tissue Engineering: A Critical ReviewDevon E. Anderson0Brian Johnstone1Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United StatesDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United StatesArticular cartilage functions to transmit and translate loads. In a classical structure–function relationship, the tissue resides in a dynamic mechanical environment that drives the formation of a highly organized tissue architecture suited to its biomechanical role. The dynamic mechanical environment includes multiaxial compressive and shear strains as well as hydrostatic and osmotic pressures. As the mechanical environment is known to modulate cell fate and influence tissue development toward a defined architecture in situ, dynamic mechanical loading has been hypothesized to induce the structure–function relationship during attempts at in vitro regeneration of articular cartilage. Researchers have designed increasingly sophisticated bioreactors with dynamic mechanical regimes, but the response of chondrocytes to dynamic compression and shear loading remains poorly characterized due to wide variation in study design, system variables, and outcome measurements. We assessed the literature pertaining to the use of dynamic compressive bioreactors for in vitro generation of cartilaginous tissue from primary and expanded chondrocytes. We used specific search terms to identify relevant publications from the PubMed database and manually sorted the data. It was very challenging to find consensus between studies because of species, age, cell source, and culture differences, coupled with the many loading regimes and the types of analyses used. Early studies that evaluated the response of primary bovine chondrocytes within hydrogels, and that employed dynamic single-axis compression with physiologic loading parameters, reported consistently favorable responses at the tissue level, with upregulation of biochemical synthesis and biomechanical properties. However, they rarely assessed the cellular response with gene expression or mechanotransduction pathway analyses. Later studies that employed increasingly sophisticated biomaterial-based systems, cells derived from different species, and complex loading regimes, did not necessarily corroborate prior positive results. These studies report positive results with respect to very specific conditions for cellular responses to dynamic load but fail to consistently achieve significant positive changes in relevant tissue engineering parameters, particularly collagen content and stiffness. There is a need for standardized methods and analyses of dynamic mechanical loading systems to guide the field of tissue engineering toward building cartilaginous implants that meet the goal of regenerating articular cartilage.http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fbioe.2017.00076/fullchondrocytechondrogenesisdynamic compressiondynamic loadingbioreactortissue engineering
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Devon E. Anderson
Brian Johnstone
spellingShingle Devon E. Anderson
Brian Johnstone
Dynamic Mechanical Compression of Chondrocytes for Tissue Engineering: A Critical Review
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
chondrocyte
chondrogenesis
dynamic compression
dynamic loading
bioreactor
tissue engineering
author_facet Devon E. Anderson
Brian Johnstone
author_sort Devon E. Anderson
title Dynamic Mechanical Compression of Chondrocytes for Tissue Engineering: A Critical Review
title_short Dynamic Mechanical Compression of Chondrocytes for Tissue Engineering: A Critical Review
title_full Dynamic Mechanical Compression of Chondrocytes for Tissue Engineering: A Critical Review
title_fullStr Dynamic Mechanical Compression of Chondrocytes for Tissue Engineering: A Critical Review
title_full_unstemmed Dynamic Mechanical Compression of Chondrocytes for Tissue Engineering: A Critical Review
title_sort dynamic mechanical compression of chondrocytes for tissue engineering: a critical review
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
issn 2296-4185
publishDate 2017-12-01
description Articular cartilage functions to transmit and translate loads. In a classical structure–function relationship, the tissue resides in a dynamic mechanical environment that drives the formation of a highly organized tissue architecture suited to its biomechanical role. The dynamic mechanical environment includes multiaxial compressive and shear strains as well as hydrostatic and osmotic pressures. As the mechanical environment is known to modulate cell fate and influence tissue development toward a defined architecture in situ, dynamic mechanical loading has been hypothesized to induce the structure–function relationship during attempts at in vitro regeneration of articular cartilage. Researchers have designed increasingly sophisticated bioreactors with dynamic mechanical regimes, but the response of chondrocytes to dynamic compression and shear loading remains poorly characterized due to wide variation in study design, system variables, and outcome measurements. We assessed the literature pertaining to the use of dynamic compressive bioreactors for in vitro generation of cartilaginous tissue from primary and expanded chondrocytes. We used specific search terms to identify relevant publications from the PubMed database and manually sorted the data. It was very challenging to find consensus between studies because of species, age, cell source, and culture differences, coupled with the many loading regimes and the types of analyses used. Early studies that evaluated the response of primary bovine chondrocytes within hydrogels, and that employed dynamic single-axis compression with physiologic loading parameters, reported consistently favorable responses at the tissue level, with upregulation of biochemical synthesis and biomechanical properties. However, they rarely assessed the cellular response with gene expression or mechanotransduction pathway analyses. Later studies that employed increasingly sophisticated biomaterial-based systems, cells derived from different species, and complex loading regimes, did not necessarily corroborate prior positive results. These studies report positive results with respect to very specific conditions for cellular responses to dynamic load but fail to consistently achieve significant positive changes in relevant tissue engineering parameters, particularly collagen content and stiffness. There is a need for standardized methods and analyses of dynamic mechanical loading systems to guide the field of tissue engineering toward building cartilaginous implants that meet the goal of regenerating articular cartilage.
topic chondrocyte
chondrogenesis
dynamic compression
dynamic loading
bioreactor
tissue engineering
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fbioe.2017.00076/full
work_keys_str_mv AT devoneanderson dynamicmechanicalcompressionofchondrocytesfortissueengineeringacriticalreview
AT brianjohnstone dynamicmechanicalcompressionofchondrocytesfortissueengineeringacriticalreview
_version_ 1716744176710713344